Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard/archive/2018

File:Mālāsana yoga pose.jpg

File:Mālāsana yoga pose.jpg has just been deleted but I submitted a PDF of Proof of License to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org two days ago (on 3 Jan 2017).--Penbat (talk) 08:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

@Penbat: I have restored the file and tagged it so it won’t be deleted for at least 30 days. Please read our License Policy thoroughly, noting the licenses we accept, and the relevant section on our OTRS page (particularly number 3), before proceeding any further. Green Giant (talk) 09:48, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 18:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Files wurden gelöscht, obwohl sie genehmigt wurden

Hallo, unter https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Sunshine76 wurde entschieden, dass meine zur Löschung vorgeschlagenen Fotos behalten werden und in der Diskussion unten steht, dass ein "O.Koslowski" die OTRS templates ergänzen hätte sollen, was aber offenbar leider nicht passiert ist. Die Files wurden am 24.12. gelöscht und auch von der Seite entfernt.

Habe ich da etwas missverstanden/falsch gemacht oder falls nicht, könnt ihr bitte die Files wieder herstellen und mit den notwendigen templates versehen? Muss es auf der Seite von https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gert_Haussner neu verlinkt werden?

Danke und liebe Grüße, Claudia Sunshine76 (talk) 10:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Der Einsender des Tickets hat eine Antwort erhalten, was zur Freigabe noch fehlt. --Krd 10:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Ich bin der Einsender des Tickets und habe am 11.11. die Nachricht erhalten, dass für die Fotos nichts mehr fehlt. Was muss ich also tun? Hab ich eine andere Mail übersehen? Sunshine76 (talk) 15:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Nach Rücksprache mit O.Koslowski habe ich diese Dateien wiederhergestellt. De728631 (talk) 15:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:48, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Phineas Gage Cased Daguerreotype

Would it be possible to view the email from Jack and Beverly Wilgus, the copyright holders of this image (ticket #2009080110000994), to aid this discussion? nagualdesign 04:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

@Nagualdesign: No, per the Privacy Policy.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 05:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Fair enough. Thank you for dropping a message at the discussion. nagualdesign 06:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

@Nagualdesign: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:47, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Question regarding works by Hans Stocker

The painter Hans Stocker died in 1983, so his works are still protected by copyright. He also created stained glass windows for churches, and there are several photographs of such windows in Category:Works by Hans Stocker (painter) (category newly created by NeverDoING). As there is no freedom of panorama for the interior of buildings in Switzerland, we can keep these (taken from the inside) only if there is a free license. I notice that some of the older uploads such as File:Karl Luzern Glasfenster Christus.jpg have an OTRS ticket #2014062810005281 and were restored by Steinsplitter after this restoration request in 2014. My question now is: Does this OTRS permission apply to all works by Hans Stocker or only specifically to Stocker's works in St. Karl church in Lucerne? If the latter, then we would have delete some of the later uploads (windows of St. Anton church in Basel). I believe that we could keep File:St-anton-basel-innen.jpg (which I took and uploaded in 2007), as I think that in this case, the glass windows are de minimis (blurry, not central to the image - I therefore removed it from the Hans Stocker category) and the church itself, the lectern, altar, and choir cross are designed by Karl Moser, who died in 1936. Gestumblindi (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

OTRS tickets for images showing artwort nearly always apply to the specific images only. This is also the case here. --Krd 18:47, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply; I filed a DR. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

• DR closed with two deletions. Green Giant (talk) 15:57, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 15:57, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Matteo Gelardi

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Since we are "stuck" in this deletion procedure I'd like to know if you received the mail from User:MatteoGelardi1957. Thank you.--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

@Alexmar983: Yes, thanks.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:55, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

---

 Done DR was closed as kept.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: For archiving, --George Ho (talk) 00:23, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

File:UCU Library.jpg and File:Perfectial.jpg

Hi! As I saw yesterday, the uploaded by me images (such as File:UCU Library.jpg, File:UCU Library.jpg) was deleted by User:Smooth O. I have two questions:

1) File:UCU Library.jpg - the friend of mine who personally took this photo sent an email with written permission on "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org". It was done on the Ukrainian language in September 2017. Could you please restore the image or should I request undeletion?

2) File:Perfectial.jpg - The owner of the company Andriy Skoropad (by my request) personally sent the written permission on "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" today. Here is a ticket number -[Ticket#2018011110006965] (Confirmation of receipt). Could you please restore the image or should I request undeletion?

Thank in advance for your reply. Chekannataliia (talk) 14:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

@Chekannataliia: It takes few months to process an OTRS ticket due to a huge queue of messages. Please be patient: a sysop will undelete the files once the tickets is approved. --Ruthven (msg) 13:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: It's actually closer to 24 days today. @Chekannataliia: Do you have the ticket number or unique email content for the UCU Library ticket?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: ticket:2018011110006965 was received few days ago, and still waiting to be processed. --Ruthven (msg) 14:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Hi. I don't have a tiket number (it was 5 month ago), but the email address of the person who took this photo and setnt an email with written permission is following: <private information>. Chekannataliia (talk) 14:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Chekannataliia: I found no tickets bound to that e-mail. A possibility is that it was moved into spam. Can you please ask your friend to forward us the e-mail again? Thank you. As I said before, the file will be undeleted after processing the ticket. --Ruthven (msg) 15:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: Hi. I asked him to send one more email with written permission. Here is a ticket - [Ticket#: 2018011510004969]. Chekannataliia (talk) 10:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

@Chekannataliia: Thank you, I already answered. Unfortunately there is not Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine, which means that you cannot photograph freely a building for anything else than personal purposes. Sorry. --Ruthven (msg) 12:34, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: Pity to hear that. But anyway thanks a lot for your help and time. Chekannataliia (talk) 09:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 10:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Photographs by user: Vyacheslav Bukharov

I report on behalf of aforementioned user having one photo under discussed deletion on a bogus accusation and another one deleted because a doppelgänger was found on an obscure site http://dist66.ru/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=94#p530 where some schoolchildren compose compilations of photos obviously not made by themselves. The photographer has no specific evidences (neither physical nor digital) proving his authorship, except possibly for EXIF indicating the date about 2003. The photographs are purely personal and no institution is involved. I doubt that he is a photographer of any note with known credentials (such as website or a Email address), nor has he any friends among Wikimedians.

If anything good can be done about File:Качканар - ключ от города.jpg using OTRS (the “previously published without a free license” clause, or any else?), then contact the photographer, please. Note that I watch that page so you haven’t contact or ping me explicitly about the problem. Thank for your attention. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Incnis Mrsi: Vyacheslav Bukharov is welcome to send permission via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

P.S. The person in question is proven to be inconsistent. I am sorry for insinuations about file deletion processes on Commons. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:38, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 10:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Permission

Can somebody check if the permission for the file (File:Parul Yadav award.jpg) is valid? —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 07:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parul Yadav award.jpg. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 10:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Template:Odelay

I think, this info may be misleading in some cases as various COM:OTRS language versions suggest sending emails to various language-specyfic OTRS queues, and not all queues are configured for autoresponse (eg. permissions-es, -it & -pl are not). @Jameslwoodward: pinging you as this is your change. Ankry (talk) 19:40, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

The template is simply an easy way of writing out what I and others usually say anyway. I'd be happy to have you:

1) suggest specific changes here,

2) have appropriate translations made, or

3) have the automatic reply added to the other versions of OTRS.

Obviously (3) would be the best solution since keeping people waiting without knowing what is happening is not good.

Until either (2) or (3) can be implemented, how about this:

"If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the image will be restored automatically when and if the e-mail is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the e-mail is processed and the image is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS, if the e-mail has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply."

I have changed the template, with one change -- the first sentence of the second paragraph didn't read right to me. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

I like 3, but Jim's text is a good start until 3 happens. @Ankry: I think you have the wrong diff.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 22:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Indeed. Thank you, Jeff, for notifying me of that. Fixed for future reference. The message fix seems OK also to me. Ankry (talk) 22:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 10:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Checking permissions for Images for Americo Makk, otrs:2018011110001728

Checking on the permissions sent on 1/14/2018 to make sure they are correct. The permission for the images using the commons consent was sent by copyright holder Makk Studios 1/14/2018 with the images listed in the permission reflecting ticket (otrs:2018011110001728) in the subject. Thank you for your assistance.

Cstein99 (talk)

@Cstein99: What email address was it sent to? I seem not to have permission to see it.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

ticket:2018011110001728 (the otrs: prefix doesn't apparently work for this ticket). I'm handling it. Just like I was handling it a few days ago when they asked at the enwiki OTRS noticeboard. There are dozens of emails to go through. They can be patient. --Majora (talk) 21:42, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

My apologies for the boondoggle- Looks like when Makk Studios emailed the permission for the 24 images (links to the 24 images listed with the permission in one email) a new ticket number was assigned in the confirmation email from permission-commons@wikimedia.com for Ticket:2018011410001268.

Cstein99 (talk)

*sigh* You really couldn't be patient could you? I just responded back to the original email after going through all the images. Now there is going to be more duplicates. And that release isn't proper for all of those files. As I said in the email that was just sent. Now I have to do another merge. Could you please stop creating new tickets. It is starting to get annoying. --Majora (talk) 05:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Thank you for the email. We will work it through. Cstein99 (talk)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 10:21, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Ahmad Jamal Glasgow 03-07-94.jpg

Dear OTRS volunteers, could someone please check that there exists a record for the wonderful photo at File:Ahmad Jamal Glasgow 03-07-94.jpg? The permission field on that page says (in French) that permission was sent on 2006-09-06. Ariadacapo (talk) 08:06, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

@Ariadacapo: Only found two other different photographs in Ticket:2006090610003995 on 2006-09-06. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 09:08, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I have just tagged the file as missing permission. Ariadacapo (talk) 18:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 10:21, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

File "1953_trazado_camino_Ixtapa_-_Tlacotepec.jpg" was removed even though it has ticket

Hi:

Today was erased a file named "1953_trazado_camino_Ixtapa_-_Tlacotepec.jpg" from my uploads, it was used in the article San Juan Achiutla in Spanish and English, I think it have permission by the ticket #2017111510000928, could you review if this action was right please? I will appreciate if you let me know its status. Thanks in advance. --Eduardo Ruiz Mondragón (talk) 03:27, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Eduardo Ruiz Mondragón

 Support @Eduardo Ruiz Mondragón: Permission for File:1953 trazado camino Ixtapa - Tlacotepec.jpg was indeed approved in Ticket:2017111510000928. I don't know what happened to cause Jcb to think it wasn't approved.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

OTRS agent Krd tagged the file as not yet approved. Jcb (talk) 15:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

I have requested undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:1953_trazado_camino_Ixtapa_-_Tlacotepec.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 05:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

@Eduardo Ruiz Mondragón: It was restored, and I tagged it with the appropriate permission. Sorry for the delay and inconvenience.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 19:38, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 10:21, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

File:YOU & I artwork.jpg

Can you retrieve this picture, here is its's permission.

[Ticket#: 2018012810004999] -- Cleanzuhause (talk) 18:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 19:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

I hope you haven't seen the ticket. It was received by author after sending the mail giving free license permission according to commons standards. [Ticket#: 2018012810004999] -- Cleanzuhause (talk) 02:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

• ticket:2018012810004999 regarding an album cover by Shifta and Che'Nelle.

@Cleanzuhause: Please note we currently have just over 10,000 emails to go through at OTRS and not enough volunteers. The backlog stretches back to April 2017. Why should your upload be prioritised above all the others? If you intend to use it on an article, it will be easier to upload locally under fair use (if the wiki allows it), until the ticket is attended to. For the record, I’m not 100% confident that the emailer (who I assume is a family member) has the authority to license the album cover. It would be better to have the license come directly from either Shifta or Che'Nelle (they each have verified websites that would more than suffice). Green Giant (talk) 12:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 10:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Mahindra Quanto image.JPG

Can someone check under what license this photo (File:Mahindra Quanto image.JPG) is released, because current license is obviously can't apply to this photo. --Smooth O (talk) 08:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

• ticket:2012112810002741

@Smooth O: Thank you for pointing this out. I have changed it to the correct licenses per the ticket. Green Giant (talk) 10:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 10:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Ulmus minor 'Dicksonii'. Hilliers. 1990.jpg

Hello, I see that the file Ulmus minor 'Dicksonii'. Hilliers. 1990.jpg I uploaded was recently deleted.

I believe the OTRS email was sent by the copyright holder on or around 16th Dec 2017.

Would somone be able to have another look for it please? I can't put the copyright holders email address here unfortunately.

Thank you. Tom_elm^talk 07:47, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

• {{O}} @Tom elm: Only three filenames are mentioned in Ticket:2017121810009351; this isn't one of them.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 09:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: An email had just been sent again by the copyright holder. Would you mind having a quick look please? Thank you for your help. Tom_elm^talk 10:08, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Tom elm: I found it, thanks.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Great - thank you. Do I need to re-upload the image? I'm not sure if you are able to un-delete? Tom_elm^talk 11:07, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Tom elm: No to both, I have requested undeletion of File:Ulmus minor 'Dicksonii'. Hilliers. 1990.jpg for you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:13, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Much appreciated - thank you. Tom_elm^talk 11:18, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Tom elm: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:26, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Tom_elm^talk 15:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Lord John Taylor.jpg

One question. Did the copyright holder give permission to allow image larger than 500px per Ticket:2017031310014487? Someone else uploaded a version larger than the initial size. George Ho (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Oh, dear. This ticket went on for ages... No size is actually specified, however as soon as it was deleted (17:31, 25 February 2017), then the e-mail arrived the next day asking for undeletion. So we have to assume that 500 × 490 is the size that the long e-mail trail refers to. Also knowing all the discussion, my view is that they would not want a bigger one. I'll hide the big image. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 01:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

@Ronhjones: You should also protect the page though, to avoid further changes. However, I think that forbidding to scale the image up goes against the "modification" part of the CC by-sa license. --Ruthven (msg) 15:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: OK, I think that if someone was to take the image and just scale up, then that should be allowed. It's not so clear when someone uploads a bigger, obviously higher resolution image which is not derived from the original. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 17:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

@Ronhjones: Upload-protection is okay, but I think page-protection in any form is too extensive. Upload-protection can be retained, but the page should be either unprotected (or lowered to semi-protection). George Ho (talk) 23:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

@George Ho:  Done Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

File:David Bailey at East End exhibition opening.jpg

The image was uploaded by the then-admin/then-volunteer who is now WMF-banned. I don't know the identity of the copyright holder as the Author line doesn't name that person. Did that user photograph this? If not, who else did? George Ho (talk) 03:53, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

I didn't see the EXIF data; it says "(c) Ben Broomfield". Did this person give permission to it? George Ho (talk) 03:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

@George Ho: Yes, I updated the page.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Image

Hi, Apologies if this is utterly stupid but I have 0% knowledge with OTRS,
For this image it states the Author is "Ville Paul Paasimaa" and they've released it under a "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" license however the source provided is "Instagram" instead of "Own Work"
I wasn't sure whether this was a copyvio and everyone was fooled or whether everything's above board and the source bit was a honest mistake,
Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 03:14, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Also another image is using the exact same ticket (unless the ticket applies to both images?), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 03:19, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

@Davey2010: In the source field you can put whatever the source is. So, if a file comes from an Instagram account, it's ok to write that. The ticket is in Finnish, but looks regular an valid for the two photos (the other one was published at [1]). Normally OTRS tickets are not about "own work", but about authors that are not the uploaders. Sometimes the source tag {{Author permission}} is used. --Ruthven (msg) 12:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Ah okay, well thanks for kindly looking in to it anyway :), –Davey2010^Talk 14:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 12:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Art-Hanoi images

Recently the owner of Art-Hanoi.com (Sema) sent a letter confirming that he's Pyvanet~commonswiki (Ticket#: 2018030110001396) and asked for bis images (that he uploaded 9 years here ago) to be undeleted that were deleted as having "missing permissions", now I've come to a deal with him that I can import other images of Nguyễn Dynasty era coinage from Art-Hanoi.com but will need to be able to confirm his permission for this, should I ask him to open an OTRS ticket 🎟 for every image or can one "continuous OTRS ticket 🎟" green light an import for multiple images ? --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 05:39, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Ticket answered. We do not need a permission for each image, but the copyright of the items must be clarified. --Ruthven (msg) 14:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for processing this ticket 🎟 so quickly, I will upload more coins from Art-Hanoi in the future. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

JADE DAVIN

I might be asking the wrong people here, but I am desperately trying to find out what ever happened to jade davin, the adult actress from 10 + years ago.. I know it's sad but I just want to know if I can contact her, I have been besotted by her for years and years, but nobody seems to know where she is now. I realise she is long retired, but non the less I would love to say hi.... I live in England so it's not like I'm going to bother her, I just think she is beautiful and would like to know what she is doing these days.. Can you or anyone help?.. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.132.186.163 (talk) 16:08, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Well, this is off-topic here, so I would direct you to simply search for her name with a search engine and you will get your results. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:42, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Can I forward e-mails to the OTRS?

I have personally received permission from a well-known numismatist to upload images he sent me, as forwarded messages can be manipulated I supposed that I can't do that, but out of curiosity can a forwarded message be accepted or would I have to ask him to e-mail to the OTRS directly, though I'm still trying to convince him to register an account. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:41, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

{ping|Donald Trung}} OTRS do not accept forwarded e-mails any more. The permission needs to come from the copyright holder, and his identity will need to be verified (unless the e-mail domain makes it obvious)Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Re-pinging Donald Trung on Ron's behalf. George Ho (talk) 22:12, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank y'all, I've told the person concerned of this fact. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:43, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:43, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Why was Anno Domini band photo deleted?

I have just seen "(Bot: Removing Commons:File:Anno Domini (NSW band) heads 600px wide.jpg (en). It was deleted on Commons by Jcb (No permission since 8 February 2018).)" Why did Jcb delete this photo? I completed all the copyright question messages asked for when I uploaded it. I created the image and have the warm approval of the men in it, the band members. Iph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iph (talk • contribs) 17:06, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

• Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:10, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

@Iph: Please read User talk:Iph#File tagging File:Anno Domini (NSW band) heads 600px wide.jpg more thoroughly.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:10, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

The file has been reuploaded to File:Anno Domini (NSW band) heads (width 600 pixels).jpg and the OTRS ticket is being processed. --Ruthven (msg) 13:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 13:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Vittorio Messori Desenzano 2004.jpg

Can someone check OTRS ticket for this File:Vittorio Messori Desenzano 2004.jpg and add template as appropriate. --Smooth O (talk) 10:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Smooth O, I looked at ticket:2007120610013743 and ticket:2007120610013654. I don't see any permission from the photographer, or even indication of who that might have been. Not relevant to this project, but I also see what appears to be an invalid release of text material under the GFDL, which has not been acceptable for Wikipedia since 2009 or so, but perhaps I'm mistaken. Ping Elitre, who handled the tickets. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

In ticket:2007120610013743 it is specified that he releases the photo in the public domain, which is acceptable. I think that it is appropriate, and that the customer was entitled to provide the permission; maybe the e-mail... --Ruthven (msg) 18:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Ruthven, please forgive me if I am being obtuse here, but I see no indication that the person who made that claim was the photographer, nor any evidence of how copyright ownership was acquired by that person from the photographer. Why is the public-domain claim sufficient, and why would we accept it from that person? I wasn't around in 2007, but I know that I would ask for further clarification if I handled that ticket now – probably using our standard "permission from photographer not subject" reply. Note: I seem to have completely failed to notice the age of this ticket when I looked at it before – my comment above about an invalid release under the GFDL is quite wrong. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Justlettersandnumbers We cannot continue this conversation without mentioning private data. Please see my message on the OTRS wiki. --Ruthven (msg) 10:39, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 23:01, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Li Mei-shu Memorial Gallery wants to donate Li's painting works to Commons

Hello, OTRS agents. Li Mei-shu Memorial Gallery has a cooperation with Wikimedia Taiwan, and want to donate Li's painting works to Wikimedia Commons. Now the gallery send a letter to OTRS (Ticket:2018011710003313) asking about the process and format of this donation. Please give us suggestions. CC: @Reke and Shangkuanlc. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 08:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

@Taiwania Justo: It seems that the ticket has been answered. The basic process is to ensure that the Gallery holds all the copyright for the photos and provides a valid license. Then, a customized license template will be made for their uploads, or simply they will be marked as OTRS approved. --Ruthven (msg) 22:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 22:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

File:The Hot Chick movie.jpg

Can anyone check who gave permission for this movie poster: File:The Hot Chick movie.jpg? --Smooth O (talk) 20:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

@Smooth O: Non valid ticket since 02-06-2016. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 21:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 23:00, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Indra A (7).jpg

At File talk:Indra A (7).jpg it is suggested that the uploader had permission to upload this image. A ticket number is mentioned. Could you look into it? Lymantria (talk) 16:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

@Lymantria: That filename is not mentioned in that French language ticket.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I'll delete the file talk page then. Lymantria (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 23:00, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Photo toujours refusée

Bonjour, depuis début janvier je tente de mettre une photo d'un auteur de notre maison d'édition et chaque fois c'est refusé ou retiré par n'importe qui en disant qu'on viole les droits d'auteurs. Alors que de 1 - j'ai fait envoyer le fichier de la photographe par la photographe elle-même (avec le courriel direct pour demander une licence) pour créer une licence dans les règles et que nous n'avons jamais eu de retour de personne. 2- je tente sans succès, malgré l'accord et l'approbation de la photographe de mettre cette photo et c'est toujours impossible, plus d'un mois après la première requête. Est-ce que c'est possible de me laisser publier la photo svp, l'auteur et nous-mêmes aimerions avoir une photo à jour et libérée de droits sur la page. Il me semble que c'est simple à comprendre et que ce n'est pas "criminel". Merci de m'expliquer pourquoi ça ne fonctionne jamais.

Je parle de cette page: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Goudreault

J'en suis à ma quatrième discussion sur le sujet. Oui, j'ai suivi toutes les étapes et fait les demandes de licences comme il se doit, mais on me refuse toujours l'upload de la photo. Est-ce que quelqu'un peut véritablement m'aider, ici?

Merci

Janie Librex — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janie.librex (talk • contribs) 14:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

@Janie.librex: S'il vous plait, ne téléchargez pas à nouveau le fichier: il sera récupéré à peine l'autorisation sera lue et acceptée. Quand avez-vous envoyé le courriel? Avez-vous reçu une réponse automatique du système? Pour qu'un ticket en français soit lu, il faut attendre au moins 3 mois, à cause du manque de volontaires. --Ruthven (msg) 06:58, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: Ça fait plus d'un mois...j'imagine que je dois patienter. J'ai envoyé un message et la photographe aussi. Nous avons toutes les deux reçu le message automatique. Merci. Janie Librex. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janie.librex (talk • contribs) 15:09, 5 February 2018‎ (UTC)

• Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Oui, patience. Il semble que le service OTRS français soit débordé en ce moment. --Ruthven (msg) 23:01, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 23:01, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Validation

Hello,

I recently uploaded several images in Category:Fred Coppula and its parent category Category:Films by Fred Coppula. I was told that the otrs authorization had been sent, but so far they haven't been validated. Could you please confirm that the mail has been received ? Thanks. JJ Georges (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

@JJ Georges: Yes, the email message in French, originally assigned 2018013110009059, was filed into Ticket:2017062410003963, now open. Sorry for the delay.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:34, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: thanks, and no problem. Is there anything wrong with the permission ? JJ Georges (talk) 08:51, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@JJ Georges: I have a question about it. I see that https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tony_Carrera_Maman_ou_papa.png for example has "author=Max Antoine pour Fred Coppula prod." and "{{self|author=Fred Coppula prod|cc-by-sa-4.0}}". Can you please specify how Fred Coppula prod. owns the copyright, or at least owns the right to license?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:31, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: sure. Fred Coppula is a director and producer, and "Fred Coppula prod" is his company, which owns the copyright and the right to license for all the images. The images include stills from film that he has directed and produced, or just produced. In either case, his company owns the rights. "Max Antoine" is the director of some of the films - hence it seemed only fair to credit him - but not the copyright owner. There are a few other files in that case which have already been validated, like this one. JJ Georges (talk) 13:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@JJ Georges: Thank you. I would expand it to just "Fred Coppula Productions" with no mention of cameraperson, cinematographer, director, or producer.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:02, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I just moved the mention of the director in the file descriptions, and I left "Fred Coppula prod." as the sole author just as I had done for the previous files. Therefore, the description is identical in all files and we avoid confusion about the copyright owner. Is that ok for you ? JJ Georges (talk) 14:28, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@JJ Georges: Yes, thanks. I replied to the ticket.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:35, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: ok, thanks. Does that mean everything is ok for the validation ? (sorry I'm asking, but I'm not quite sure I understand all the steps) JJ Georges (talk) 16:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@JJ Georges: Not until tomorrow UTC at the earliest.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Hello, sorry to bother you again. I notice that the images have not yet been validated, while others that I posted two days ago have already been. I'd just like to know if there is anything wrong and if I can do anything to fix it. Thanks, JJ Georges (talk) 08:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

@JJ Georges: I am waiting for an email reply.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 00:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: an email reply from whom, and about what ? (sorry, I'm a bit at loss with the details of the procedure) JJ Georges (talk) 09:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@JJ Georges: from the copyright holder, about permission. I'm sorry for being obtuse, but the WMF Privacy Policy won't let me write more.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: oh dear, I'm afraid this won't work out. I never got more than very short answers from the copyright holder, who merely sent back to commons the authorization form that I had prepared for him. He did exactly that for the images we validated in June 2017, like this one. If you ask for any extra effort from him I'm not sure he'll bother.

Is it the image depicting him that poses a problem ? It's his "official" picture so I guess Studio Harcourt just made it at his request and he bought the rights to the image. The other pictures are just stills from films that he produced, like the previous ones.

If that is the problem, I'm not sure he'll ever bother to scan the contract that proves he owns the rights to his own photo. So you might as well not validate the photo depicting him and just validate the film stills... :( JJ Georges (talk) 15:25, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@JJ Georges: Would you please document that info in the current ticket (including old ticket numbers and email addresses), by adding the following to the subject bar of the email: [Ticket#: 2017062410003963]?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:45, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: excuse me, but I'm afraid I don't understand. I don't have access to the OTRS tickets. What should I exactly do and where ? Do you want me to send an email confirming that the copyright holder is the same person who validated the previous images ? Or do you want me to write it here ? JJ Georges (talk) 16:06, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I've sent an email. I hope this helps. JJ Georges (talk) 18:23, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 23:03, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

I sent in an email 14 days ago or longer and still haven't got a reply OTRS Ticket number is [Ticket#2018013110011279]

Dear OTRS Volunteers, Kruttika Ravindra had sent an email with subject "Permission to use the File:Actress_Kruttika_Ravindra_in_September_2017.jpg" 14 days ago and still hasn't got reply. OTRS Ticket number she received is Ticket#2018013110011279

Please review the email and let us know if it can be processed and the file deleted be restored back.

Thank You Sampigesrini (talk) 18:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

@Sampigesrini: Process in progress. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 20:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 23:02, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Hills near Lokti Village-2.jpg

I am looking to get permission for this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Belarus-Hills_near_Lokti_Village-2.jpg

It says it is approved by the owner. How am I able to see a copy of proof of use?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knisefa11 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Knisefa11: You can't. As explained at Commons:OTRS, the correspondence is not visible to the public, and volunteers are prohibited from sharing non-public information. All they can do is verify the information already available on the file description page, which includes the licensing terms. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 23:03, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Ticket#2018022210012873

Can someone check ticket for this file? Ticket number is 2018022210012873. Thank you! --Musaeum (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 09:21, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

OTRS verification process in progress. --Ruthven (msg) 23:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 23:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Contradictory info between description table and EXIF

Do we ask for permission when the author mentioned in description table is different from the one mentioned in EXIF data? For example, please see File:Александѫр Николов.jpg where the uploader is User:Mayakyt, the author in description table is Georgi Bozhanov, and the author and copyright holder is Ivelin Metodiev according to EXIF data. And please also see the history. At first, it was not claimed to be own work. Later, another user added {{Own work}}. Thank you 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

@4nn1l2: We should ask for permission in such cases. I have done so.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 02:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 23:07, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Stuart Matthew Price

Hi. The image File:Stuart Matthew Price headshot.jpg has recently been deleted as "No OTRS permission since 2017-10-26" but Mr Price sent an email to Permissions on that date giving permission for its free use. In his email he said " I am just writing to grant my permission for Glenn Christodoulou (that's me - Jack1956) to use any of my images as he sees fit for the construction of my Wikipedia page. He is editing it all on my behalf.

Many thanks

Stuart".

Can anything be done? Thanks. Jack1956 (talk) 23:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

@Jack1956: Re Ticket:2017101210015045, we are still waiting since our email of 2 Nov 2017 15:14:56 +0000 for a complete statement of consent from the photographer or rights holder, please see COM:CONSENT.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Still no answer. Ruthven (msg) 12:54, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Droit de reproduction

Bonjour, Auteur, je souhaite utiliser des photographies de star issues de votre bibliothèque mais je ne sais pas si mon utilisation est légale. Les photos illustrent mes articles, une par article. Elles ne serviront ni à la publicité du livre, ni à la couverture. Quelle licence permet un tel usage ? En vous remerciant. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 78.194.148.32 (talk) 17:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour, ça dépend de la photo. Tu as un exemple à nous montrer? --Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Pas de réponse... Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Pictures at Category:Pictures from Oberwolfach Photo Collection (Bergman)

• ticket:2008042410024381
• ticket:2008120710003465

Pictures at Category:Pictures from Oberwolfach Photo Collection (Bergman) are in high resolution, but I'm uncertain about whether that's what either the MFO or the copyright holder wanted. Moreover, some of them look enlarged and noisy and pixelated, like File:Blum lenore.jpg. The MFO gave me small image of File:Maryam Mirzakhani in Seoul 2014.jpg since the source doesn't say "Copyright:MFO". I believe that the MFO would give us smaller-rez versions of the pictures taken by Bergman; they aren't marked "Copyright:MFO" as well. However, I'm uncertain. Can the tickets be verified to know what desired resolution the author and/or the MFO want us to use? If not, shall the MFO or the author be contacted? George Ho (talk) 00:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

If they come from the Oberwolfbach Photo Collection, the permission holds, regardless the resolution. --Ruthven (msg) 09:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Question on a ticket

Hello, I sent an email a few days ago, and usually I just wait until it gets processed, but I was wondering someone could confirm it sooner rather than later due to an edit war and another user will likely not believe me? The file is File:Harvard shield wreath.svg. In the OTRS ticket, I have forwarded an email from the Trademark Program at Harvard University that lists the correct colors. The others user will likely be reverting soon due to not believing others. Any help would be appreciated! Please ping me. Thanks, Corky 16:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

@Corkythehornetfan: Fair-use en image, so Moved to en:Wikipedia:OTRS_noticeboard#Question_on_a_ticket (and replied there) Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:58, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

@Ronhjones: Thanks, for some reason I couldn't find the Wikipedia OTRS board... it was probably one of those days I guess lol Corky 01:39, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:29, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

validity of TicketNumber=2010111410016551

New user ABC 1210 (talk · contribs) has added {{Permission OTRS|id=200100209043}} to a number of his own uploads from different sources, thereby unlikely valid. File:Colors HD.jpg, File:Do Saheliyaan.png, File:Kitani Mohabbat Hai--serial.jpg, File:Jodha Akbar-tv-show.jpg, File:Tere Liye-Serial.png, File:Main Lakshmi Tere Aangan ki-LifeOk.png, File:Tumhari Paakhi Show Poster.jpg, File:Prithvi Vallabh logo.jpg and File:Prithvi-Vallabh- Serial.jpg. Please check soon, as he continues uploading. --Túrelio (talk) 20:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

@Túrelio: The only authorized use of Ticket:2010111410016551 is File:Ben Herzl and Haramati.JPG, however it appears to be used by 100 files, so I have nominated the other 99 for deletion. Ticket:200100209043 is invalid, as it is too short.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:08, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, sir ABC 1210 (talk · contribs) has recently changed I'd as Ticket:200100209043 so I am going to remove your deletation request, thank you, if you want to any more information than leave me a message hare.

Vivekka(Talk Page), 11:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC).

Edits have been reverted now and user blocked by colleague Green Giant. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

File was removed even though ticket was submitted

OTRS Ticket#2018011410006414

File Page:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KamiconSeason10Logo.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowbird294 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

@Snowbird294: File was not specified in Ticket:2018011410006414.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 19:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

@Snowbird294: Kindly reply to that ticket with the specific name or URL of the page on Wikimedia Commons to which you have uploaded it so that ticket may be approved. Uploading an image that has been deleted is a serious violation of Commons rules and wastes your time and ours.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Ticket closed successfully. --Ruthven (msg) 09:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

PERMISSION

Nom des fichiers : Claire-Elizabeth BEAUFORT CNEWS, Clélie MATHIAS CNEWS, Gérard LECLERC CNEWS, Isabelle MOREAU CNEWS, JP ELKABBACH CNEWS,Laurence FERRARI CNEWS, Marc MENANT CNEWS, Pascal PRAUD CNEWS, Patrice BOISFER CNEWS, Patrice POIVRE DARVOR CNEWS, Sonia MABROUK CNEWS, Thierry FRERET CNEWS, Thierry MOREAU CNEWS

Lien du ticket : https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2018012510005298

Agent OTRS : Ankry

Bonjour, après la suppression de mes photos sur wikicommons puis l'envoi d'un mail à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org, il semble y avoir toujours un problème avec mes photos qui sont susceptibles de disparaître d'ici 30 jours.

Le mail que j'ai envoyé le 25/ 08/ 2018 à 11h12 est le suivant : "Bonjour, suite à la suppression des images que j’ai pris soin d’importer sur Wikicommons, je me permets de vous retourner, ci-dessous, le modèle de déclaration de consentement rempli : « Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif des œuvres qui sont en pièce jointe. Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence : CC BY-SA 4.0. Je comprends qu'en faisant cela, je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre dans un but commercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence. Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées. Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc. Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia. »

Comment le problème peut-il- être résolu et comment éviter la suppression des photos que j'ai importées ?

Merci beaucoup — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xavier1296 (talk • contribs) 13:26, 7 February 2018‎ (UTC)

Bonsoir user:Xavier1296, une réponse vous a été envoyée il y a plusieurs jours, à l'adresse qui nous a envoyé le message. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 23:11, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

No news from customer. --Ruthven (msg) 09:30, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:30, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Brainstorming at Starlab in 2001.jpg

Is the OTRS tag on File:Brainstorming at Starlab in 2001.jpg valid for the image? It came up as a Bad Flickr author through Flickr review, so I want to check.Elisfkc (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

The permission seems fine, and it isn't related to the Flickr user. --Ruthven (msg) 17:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: Cool, thanks. Elisfkc (talk) 17:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

2 new Bollywood-like templates

Today a new user created the 2 Bollywood-like templates

• {{Cc-by-3.0-BEHINDWOODS}}
• {{Cc-by-3.0-Emirates 24/7}}

which are in the cat "Custom license tags with OTRS permission", but don't carry any ticket number. As the website behindwoods.com carries the warning "All photos and videos posted on Behindwoods.com are only for promoting movies, celebrities and technicians. Those materials are published for general viewing and are strictly not resold or distributed." and emirates247.com states "Copyright © 2018. Dubai Media Incorporated. All rights reserved.", I doubt the legitimacy of these templates. Could you check whether there is any permission related to these sites? --Túrelio (talk) 11:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Considering behindwoods.com, I have found only one good permission Ticket:2015051010011128, for one file on behindwoods.com. If there were a good blanket permission before that, we would already have such a template. More later...   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Considering emirates247.com, I have found no permission tickets for files on emirates247.com. Thus, I conclude that those illegitimate templates should be removed and Mohammedjaseem66 should be prevented from making similar ones.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 00:38, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Cc-by-3.0-Emirates 24/7. --Túrelio (talk) 11:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

DR closed. --Ruthven (msg) 20:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Captive elephants taken by N. A. Naseer

One of my friend in Malayalam Wikipedia informed me that three photos of captive elephants taken by N. A. Naseer were deleted from the Malayalam Wikipedia page. Upon inspecting that page i found the files were deleted by you. They are File:Elephants of Kerala L12 (2).jpg, File:Elephants of Kerala L13 (2).jpg and File:Elephants of Kerala L14 (2).jpg. They are from the category, Category:Photographs of captive elephants taken by N. A. Naseer and I can see a similarly named one still existing with a OTRS ticket #2017030110015374. Could you check and let me know what the missing information is? Pinging the uploader, the ML Wiki editor and the only admin from Malayalam Wikipedia too for any further inputs.

One more issue I came to notice is that OTRS ticket# in both Category:Photographs by Joseph Lazer and Category:Photographs by N. A. Naseer are same in most files (#2013082110009341). So my assumption is that 1. either, there is a mistake in ticket# entered, 2. or, mails from both parties got merged. Naseer's mail ID is very well known that you can see in the license tag.

(Moved from the deleting admin's talk as suggested) Jee 13:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwatka Note.jpg

Can anyone tell me whether copyright applies to letter written and signed by a then-US Army Lieutenant? Either {{PD-USGov}} applies, or probably it's still copyrighted when it was first published in 1995 (per chart). Moreover, can ticket:2018010710000381 be evaluated please? Thanks. George Ho (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

The ticket is about the photo of the document, that was written more than 138 years ago, so I believe we can safely assume it is in the public domain now. --Ruthven (msg) 14:10, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Changed the licensing status. Now what about the OTRS tag? George Ho (talk) 20:34, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Or probably unpublished? George Ho (talk) 20:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

@George Ho: We can leave it there, or move to the talk page. The idea is to have a link to the OTRS exchange for future memory. --Ruthven (msg) 20:38, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Ticket 2018031010001271

[ticket:2018031010001271] Eugene Zelenko has advised me to communicate with you regarding permissions for which the artist has emailed you a release. May I assume now that all is in order? Here is the letter she sent:

To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.

I hereby affirm that I am Jeannine Cook, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media as shown here: web page of the content, and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

File:Twist and Sprout - Portuguese Vines II .jpg File:A Hint of Spring, Bordeneuve svpt G-1028.jpg File:Pensando en Miro X svpt-Plike - G-1096-28.jpg File:Palmetto Frond .jpg File:Stone Lace .jpg File:Stone Lace II .jpg File:Stone Lace I, silverpoint, Prismacolour, Jeannine Cook.jpg File:Cork Oak Contours, goldpoint, silverpoint, Jeannine Cook.jpg File:Pierres de Chablis, silverpoint silver foil, watercolour, Jeannine Cook.jpg File:Japanese Maple Bark, silverpoint, copperpoint, Prismacolour, Jeannine Cook.jpg File:Fallen Palmetto, silverpoint, Jeannine Cook.jpg File:Limestone Lace, silverpoint, goldpoint, Jeannine Cook.jpg File:Trillium maculatum, Spring Island, silverpoint-copperpoint, Jeannine Cook.jpg File:Pensando en Miro 3, silverpoint, Plike, Jeannine Cook.jpg File:Remembering (Catteleya), graphite, Jeannine Cook.jpg File:Summer Energy - Tillandsia recurvata, silverpoint, watercolour, Jeannine Cook.jpg File:The Weathered Cedar, silverpoint, Jeannine Cook.jpg File:Patterns of Africa, Mixed Media, Jeannine Cook.png

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites . I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Jeannine Cook Copyright holder 25 September 2017

Thank you!--Michedomi (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

@Michedomi: The files will be processed when and if the email is processed and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days after 10 March before the email is processed and the file is processed and approved.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 22:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed ticket – Forgot to mark some files with it when ticket was processed?

• File:A fsw tool types.jpg has ticket 2010122510003819
• five other uploads of the same user account are incorrectly licensed as PD-USGov, see Special:ListFiles/Pablittle85
• Does the existing ticket covers these files too?
  

--Zaccarias (talk) 09:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

@Zaccarias: I am checking into this for you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:38, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Thank you. It's just something to clean up.--Zaccarias (talk) 05:30, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

@Zaccarias: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 00:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

IPA charts

Regarding File:IPA2005 3000px.png: Are all IPA charts free, or just those from 2005 onwards? Does the permission in Ticket:2012071010000641 mention the version(s) of the IPA chart one is allowed to use? There are IPA charts from 1932, 1951 and 1979 uploaded locally on English Wikipedia, and I wonder if they could be safely copied to Commons without us making judgments on whether they meet the threshold of originality. Nardog (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

@Nardog: Only back through 2005 per what has become https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/content/full-ipa-chart, you'd have to inquire there to go back farther.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 23:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll see what I can do. Nardog (talk) 02:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 18:44, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

File:United Airlines flight 1175.jpg

Is this true? --jdx ^Re: 18:17, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

No it isn't. That ticket has to do with Category:Universytet Metro Station, Kiev. The attached "permission" letter also isn't valid as it is easily forged. I have DR'ed the image. --Majora (talk) 02:55, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

OK, thanks. So we should look closer at AyaanLamar's contributions because I have already found a QI image which has not been even nominated. --jdx ^Re: 05:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 18:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

File:IonHortopan.jpg

Can somebody check ticket 2011030410006577 for this image? Speakers of Romanian preferred. @Silenzio76: @Turbojet: what do you say? Gikü (talk) 15:56, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

The ticket 2011030410006577 releases all photos from http://www.mapn.ro/fotodb/ under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. There are hundreds of images. The permission is signed by the director of Directorate of Information and Public Relations of National Defense Ministry.

I've completed the permission to the image. --Turbojet (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

@Turbojet: Is it good how I prepared the image description? Can I continue in the same manner? Gikü (talk) 18:47, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

IMO, yes. If somebody disagrees, I also learn something.

Please make a list of all those images and let OTRS volunteers confirm the tichet everywhere. --Turbojet (talk) 09:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

@Turbojet: You mean a list of all images sharing this ticket ID, be it on rowp or Commons?

Meanwhile, please also review these ones:

• File:General Ioan Coman.jpg
• File:IonGheorghe.jpg
• File:StefanGusa.jpg

Thank you. Gikü (talk) 19:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

IMO on rowp. We talk there.

Done for the 3 above. --Turbojet (talk) 08:33, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 18:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Duki Dror.jpg

I just noticed that Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard/archive/2017#File:Duki Dror.jpg was archived without answering the questions I asked and without addressing Ronhjones' concerns. Could this please be dealt with (i.e. sort out the permission for both revisions and split them, sort out the permission for one revision and delete the other, or delete both of them) instead of swept under the rug (archived without action)? Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

OTRS Ticket Ticket:2014070610007854 - No response to the email sent by User:Sphilbrick on 26/03/2017. I've found an alternative e-mail (not a gmail address) on the (alleged) uploader's web page, so I have re-sent the enquiry. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

@LX: No reply at all - started Commons:Deletion requests/File:Duki Dror.jpg Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:14, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 13:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

OTRS ticket:2018032410006222

Hi, can any OTRS volunteer check ticket 2018032410006222 for its images 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6? Speakers of Hebrew are recommended. Thank you and a Happy Passover. Dgw (talk) 19:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Dorian Gray Wild (talk • contribs • blocks • protections • deletions • moves • rights • rights changes), In process. -- Geagea (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Dgw (talk) 22:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 13:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

OTRS ticket:2011011410009399

I'm wondering if a some OTRS volunteers would mind taking a look at Ticket:2011011410009399 and see if it can be extended to cover Commons:Deletion requests/File:British Columbia Yellowhead Highway 16 3.png. As far as I can tell, only one person commenting in the DR can see the actual ticket, and he has expressed some reservations about it. The others commenting on it (including myself) can only speculate as whether it covers all Yellowhead shield road signs. Since there are quite a number of files uploading locally to English Wilkipedia as non-free content which likely be affected by this DR's outcome, it would be helpful if a strong consensus either way (particularly about the OTRS ticket) is established. FWIW, if the ticket can be extended to cover these other files, then that's fine with me; the DR can be closed as "keep", though I think the file's licensing would need to tweaked to reflect that it is a derivative of the original file and covered by the ticket and not 100% "own work", but that's just "paperwork" so to speak. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:23, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: My opinion at that DR was as an OTRS volunteer member who had read the ticket. Yes, it's a grandfathered old ticket, but it does apply.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:51, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Sorry Jeff G. I didn't realize you are also an OTRS volunteer. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:01, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

new Roger Puta scans.

Marty Bernard seems to have scanned more of Roger Puta's photos. These were originally uploaded using OTRS ticket #2016020210001676. I don't have access to see that this permission was only for that first batch of scans or for all future scans. I've uploaded this photo, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_Roger_Puta_Photograph_(25360690290).jpg from the batch scanned in 2017 and uploaded to flickr.

Can you please confirm if the OTRS ticket applies to this new photo also? Oaktree b (talk) 15:28, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

@Oaktree b: {{RogerPuta}} appears to be fine, but it appears {{PD-heirs|Mel Finzer}} is unnecessarily duplicative of it. @Fæ: FYI.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:29, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

OTRSpermission Active Request

hello, sir iam a new user and my Account name is User:Trademark (2018) in Commons Wikipedia I love to Uploaded in Commons for TV series, channel, actors film Poster, can you please give me a new Otrs ticket number thank you sir, please tell me. Trademark (2018) (talk)

@Trademark (2018): It doesn't work that way. If you are the copyright holder of the files you intend to upload, i.e. you represent the producing company, then you should write to OTRS. Otherwise, you cannot upload this material because you don't own the rights on them. --Ruthven (msg) 20:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:22, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Should we ask for evidence of permission?

Should we tag a file with {{Npd}} when the highest resolution version of the image has been uploaded to Commons, but only lower resolution versions of the same image have been previously published elsewhere? For instance, look at File:СпиридоноваАнастасия.jpg which has a resolution of 5,120 × 3,413. While the picture has been available on the web since at least 2014 [2], the highest resolution version of the image that I could find on the web is here with a resolution of 1360 × 970. How should we normally deal with such cases? Thank you 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, More than the resolution, the user upload history should indicate what to do. Here it is the sole upload of this user, so quite doubtful. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:15, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

photo supprimées alors qu'une demande OTRS est envoyée depuis le 16/12/2017

Bonjour, demande envoyée le 16/12/2017 pour les fichiers ci-dessous : premier tag envoyé par User:Krd auquel j'ai répondu. Le 26 décembre, les tags ont été enlevés, puis quelqu'un les a rémis sans m'en avertir. l'utilisateur User:JuTa a supprimé les fichiers le 22/02 sans lire les réponses que j'avais écrites (il ne parle pas français). J'attends que ces fichiers soient réactivés jusqu'à l'obtention d'une réponse officielle de l'OTRS. Merci d'avance de votre diligence,

• File:ARCHANGE GABRIEL FOURVIERE.jpg
• File:La Fusée Lycée Claude Lebois St-Chamond.jpg
• File:Le Vouloir.jpg
• File:ROBERT DARNAS ANGE FOURVIERE.jpg
• File:Torse Musée de Lyon.jpg
• File:CHROMATISME ROBERT DARNAS.jpg
• File:Robert Darnas et President Edouard Herriot.JPG
• File:LE BIEN ET LE MAL ARIANA GENEVE.jpg
• File:oiseau blessé darnas.jpg
• File:les palmes albigny darnas.jpg
• File:Cure d ars alb.jpg
• File:Christ tassin.jpg
• File:Evolution Robert Darnas.jpg
• File:Darnas Armeniens musique.jpg
• File:Rdarnas triplés.jpg
• File:Robert darnas atelier.jpg
• File:Vierge lemenc 1.jpg
• File:Cardinal Gerlier rd.jpg
• File:Tympan tassin rd.jpg
• File:Sigle robert darnas.jpg
• File:Robert Darnas sc.jpg

--Aldebaran0101 (talk) 09:26, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Aldebaran0101,

Quel est le numéro du ticket ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour @Yann: , merci de votre réponse. L'utilisateur Otourly vient de me donner le numéro de ticket OTRS 2017120910003266, Cordialement, --Aldebaran0101 (talk) 09:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: AntonierCH ^(d) 17:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Demande de restauration

Bonjour,
veuillez trouver ci-joint copie du mail que j'adressais le dimanche 11 février 2018 15:05 à user:AntonierCH.
A ma surprise, sans que je sois averti d'une discussion, et sans réponse concrète, après apposition d'un bandeau stipulant que l'origine de l'adresse mail n'est actuellement pas identifiée les fichiers sont supprimés sans préavis le 11 mars 2018 à 00:30 par Jcb.
Quelle demarche doit être efectuée auprès de l'OTRS pour leur restauration alors que l'autorisation de l'auteur a été transmise ?
--Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 13:11, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

---

Message d'origine-----

De : Wikimedia Commons [3]
Envoyé : dimanche 11 février 2018 15:05
À : 6PO
Objet : Copie de votre message à AntonierCH : Wikimedia Commons email from user "6PO"

Bonjour AntonierCH,

Les règles de l'ORTS protègent parfaitement le droit d'auteur et ne sont jamais à remettre en cause. Cependant j'ai depuis quelques mois beaucoup de mal à comprendre leur application.

Ainsi pour File:Île du Levant. Nature.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%8Ele_du_Levant._Nature.jpg j'ai transmis une autorisation avec licence établie en pdf par l'auteur vérifiable sur une adresse web. Ce dernier (Michel Guinard) a néanmoins du répondre à une demande OTRS (ce qui l'a un rien agacé...

Pour File:Île du Levant. Phare du Titan.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%8Ele_du_Levant._Phare_du_Titan.jpg même démarche de transmission en pdf par l'auteur (Olivier Hoarau) [il s'agit du meme auteur que pour les fichiers suivants].

Puis lui est demandé des autorisations et des licences pour une série de clichés. Ce qu'il accorde très rapidement :

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%8Ele_du_Levant._Castelas._Ruines_1.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%8Ele_du_Levant._Castelas._Ruines_2.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%8Ele_du_Levant._Castelas._Ruines_3.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%8Ele_du_Levant._S%C3%A9maphore_du_Titan_2.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%8Ele_du_Levant._Tour_du_Titan._Ruine.jpg

par mail qui vous sont transmis mais qui sont remis en cause ?

La procédure est pourtant la même que :

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grotte_des_Eymards._Lans-en-Vercors._1.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grotte_des_Eymards._Lans-en-Vercors._2.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grotte_des_Eymards._Lans-en-Vercors._3.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grotte_des_Eymards._Lans-en-Vercors._4.jpg

En résumé que faire ?
Rechercher des clichés est difficiles car identifier les auteurs est ardu, trouver comment les contacter difficile et parfois pour une raison qui est leur droit l'absence de réponse ou le refus est acté.

Merci de tout ce que vous faites pour l'OTRS mais essayez d'être clair dans vos souhaits. Remettez si nécessaire la page de demande à jour sur Commons.

Cordialement. 6PO

Bonjour 6PO,

La raison principale est qu'il y a beaucoup de retard dans le traitement des autorisations. Désolé. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour 6PO, pourrais-tu me rappeler le numéro de ticket pour que j'expédie cela ? Effectivement, notre backlog est a plus d'une centaine de jours et la qualité et rapidité du traitement (surtout si un suivi est nécessaire faute d'informations incomplètes ou insuffisantes par exemple) peut laisser à désirer. --AntonierCH ^(d) 14:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour --AntonierCH, je retrouve dans mes archives : Ticket#2018012510011852 . Est-ce bien cela ? Merci pour tout ce travail et Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 14:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

6PO : Ce courriel a reçu une réponse. Nous avons demandé à l'auteur de nous confirmer que l'autorisation était authentique (vous êtes en copie du courriel). A ce jour, il ne semble pas qu'il nous ait répondu. --AntonierCH ^(d) 15:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour AntonierCH, en absence de réponse, pour une question qu'il ne juge peut-être pas prioritaire puisque qu'il a déjà donné son autorisation, l'OTRS peut-t-elle reformuler sa demande ? Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Comme expliqué précédemment, nous sommes surchargés et n'avons pas le temps de faire de multiples relances. La procédure de base est simple, c'est l'auteur qui devrait nous contacter directement. Dans le cas présent, il s'agit d'oeuvres pour lesquels ont peut s'attendre à un retour sur ses dires de l'artiste et il me semble important qu'il nous confirme l'existence d'une telle autorisation. Exceptionnellement, je viens de le relancer. --AntonierCH ^(d) 15:51, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour AntonierCH, merci de cette démarche à la laquelle l'auteur (Olivier Hoarau) a accepté de vous répondre directement ainsi qu'en témoigne le mail du dim. 11/03/2018 17:13, avec le numéro de Ticket#2018012510011852, pour lequel il m'a mis en copie (et que je vous ai néanmoins aussi transmis). Merci pour tout ce travail qui va permettre une restauration.--Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 17:09, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour AntonierCH, vraiment un grand merci d'avoir permis ces restaurations. Toutefois je n'ose plus les remettre sur Wikipedia France car ells ne possèdent pas de ticket OTRS. Or, il s'agit du seul élément qui manque avant que l'île du Levant passe au vote AdQ. Quelle démarche dois-je effectuer ? Merci de me conseiller et de votre disponibilité. Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 21:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: AntonierCH ^(d) 17:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

News required about ticket:2017120910003266

Bonjour, Nous avons envoyé une demande d'autorisation OTRS le 16 Décembre 2017. Numéro de ticket:2017120910003266 J'ai eu des réponses de user:Cedalyon user:Krd (qui a mis des balises et supprimé les fichiers) user:Yann (qui m'a demandé le numéro de ticket, je lui ai transmis) user:Otourly (qui a trouvé le numéro de ticket)

Nous attendons l'autorisation avec impatience, Merci Aldebaran0101 (talk) 09:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

@Aldebaran0101: Veuillez consulter la section ouverte COM:ON#photo supprimées alors qu'une demande OTRS est envoyée depuis le 16/12/2017 ci-dessus. Please see open section COM:ON#photo supprimées alors qu'une demande OTRS est envoyée depuis le 16/12/2017 above. @Cedalyon, Krd, Yann, and Otourly: FYI.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:37, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

merci Jeff G. Un agent OTRS vient de nous envoyer un mail pour confirmer les autorisations. Merci de votre réponse.

Aldebaran0101 (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Aldebaran0101 (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Art work photo

Hello, I uploaded photo of a painting of mine, but I could not find the right "licence" to contribute to it, so it has been deleted. Could you please help me: basically I want to show the photo of my art only for reference, academic, or journalistic use. I do not want to give permission for commercial users to use the photo of my painting. In this case, WHICH LICENSE number should I contribute to it please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lidasher (talk • contribs) 16:45, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Lidasher: What you want to do is incompatible with the purpose and policies of this site. If you don't want your works to be free for any purpose, you should not upload them to Wikimedia Commons. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello LX, yes I have just read the section on "free enough" which states that the works have to be available to also commercial users. So yes I am afraid I cannot allow them on Wikipedia. Thanks for getting back to me.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lidasher (talk • contribs) 17:26, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 18:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

2 Tickets

I already sent permission declarations via email for:

1. Ticket 2018032610000082 for File:ยาบ้า.jpg
2. Ticket 2018032610000199 for File:ยาบ้า ซองน้ำเงิน.jpg

--Octahedron80 (talk) 04:26, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

@Octahedron80: Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

OTRS Received template added. --Ruthven (msg) 18:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 18:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Mutmaßliche Bilderserie, teilweise mit OTRS-Freigabe, teilweise ohne

Needs probably a German speaking OTRS member, hence not in English:

Es gibt einige Bilder des Fotografen Christian Nielinger, die 2008 im Berliner Konzerthaus entstanden sind. Zum Teil besitzen sie eine OTRS-Freigabe, bei einigen fehlt diese aber. Es wäre schön, wenn ein Berechtigter einmal nachsehen könnte, ob die Freigaben individuell sind oder auf die Bilder mit den fehlenden Freigaben erweitert werden könnten.

• mit Freigabe:
  • File:Zagrosek Lothar 3 lachend klein DSC 4288 Christian Nielinger.jpeg
  • File:Zagrosek Lothar 5 rot klein KON 8495 Christian Nielinger.jpeg
  • File:Zagrosek Lothar 6 rot klein KON 8723 Christian Nielinger.jpeg
  • File:Konzerthausorchester Berlin im Großen Saal 03-2008 klein KON 8927 Christian Nielinger.jpeg
• ohne Freigabe, es steht nur in der Dateibeschreibung „Das Foto ist vom Konzerthaus Berlin freigegeben, Lizenz liegt vor“ (einige Bilder müssten mMn umbenannt werden, da nichtssagend im Sinne von Commons:Dateibenennung):
  • File:DSC 3694 Vermietung Beethoven-Saal ©Christian Nielinger.jpg
  • File:DSC 3823 Rundgänge ©Christian Nielinger.jpg
  • File:DSC 3835 Vermietung GS ©Christian Nielinger.jpg
  • File:DSC 4868 Vermietung KS ©Christian Nielinger.jpg
  • File:KON 7518 Vermietung Weber-Saal ©Christian Nielinger.jpg

Der Nutzer/die Nutzerin, der/die das hochgeladen hat, war anscheinend nur dafür in Commons aktiv, seitdem nie wieder. — Speravir – 17:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

DR auf alle Dateien. Schon VFC gibt genügend Löschgründe. Hystrix (talk) 19:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Für die ersten drei liegen Freigaben durch den Fotografen Christian Nielinger vor, die sich jeweils auf genau ein Bild beziehen. Bei File:Konzerthausorchester Berlin im Großen Saal 03-2008 klein KON 8927 Christian Nielinger.jpeg sehe ich eine Freigabe durch das Konzerthaus Berlin, in der der Fotograf jedoch nicht genannt wird. Mich irritiert hier, dass der Name des Fotografen Christian Nielinger im Dateinamen auftaucht. Ob dies ein Versehen ist oder ob er der Fotograf ist, bleibt für mich hier unklar. Das zugehörige Ticket (ticket:2008062010024161) bezieht sich auch noch auf File:Lothar Zagrosek dirigiert Orfeo ed Euridice Konzerthaus Berlin © Bernd Uhlig.jpeg, wo der Fotograf genannt ist. Letzteres kommt auch (anders als die anderen Bilder) mit EXIF-Daten, die die Urheberschaft bestätigen. Dann habe ich weiter nach Tickets gesucht und stieß dabei auf ticket:2008052910016371, in dem Christian Nielinger dem Konzerthaus Berlin eine Liste von freigegebenen Bildern nennt, darunter ist auch File:Konzerthausorchester Berlin im Großen Saal 03-2008 klein KON 8927 Christian Nielinger.jpeg. Im übrigen finden sich noch redundante Freigaben zu den ersten drei Bildern. Für die zweite Gruppe ohne Freigabe habe ich keine zugehörigen Tickets finden können. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Ich habe für die Kandidaten ohne Freigabe einen Löschantrag gestellt. Das betrifft nicht nur die oben genannten, sondern alle hochgeladenen Fotos von Wilmine. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Danke (auch für die weitere Recherche), auch wenn es schade um die Bilder ist, aber hilft ja nix, wenn die angebliche Freigabe nicht übersandt wurde. — Speravir – 22:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Speravir 22:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Nilgiri Peak viewed from Jomsom airfield.jpg u.a.

Hallo zusammen, wollte nur mal nachfragen, ob das Ticket:2018020410004068 verloren gegangen ist... Das stammt vom 4. Februar, wurde aber bisher nicht bearbeitet. Mittlerweile droht die Löschung der Bilder, ich habe vorgestern meine ursprüngliche Mail erneut an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org gesendet, habe aber noch keine Antwort bekommen. Till (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

 Done Hystrix (talk) 17:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Noch nicht erledigt, da der Bearbeiter bisher keine Zeit hatte, die Ticketnummer in die Datei-Seiten einzufügen. --Till (talk) 20:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

 Done.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 20:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Danke! --Till (talk) 11:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Also many thanks. Hystrix (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

@Till.niermann and Hystrix: Bitte.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:19, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Hystrix (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Request for restore of deleted collections of images

Dear OTRS Team,

I am the Wikipedian in Residence at Goge Africa. The organisation agreed to partner with my Community, Wikimedia UG Nigeria to contributes African-cultural baased contents to Wikimedia commons for free use.

Initially, the uploads were made with the intention to submit permission request, which led to deletion of all the contents from Category: Wikipedian in Residence at Goge Africa See link here

Now, we have obtained the permission request see it below:

I will be glad if all the contents are restored Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 07:39, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Regards

@Olaniyan Olushola: Have you submitted that document to OTRS? --Ruthven (msg) 09:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: the document was sent to OTRS team via @ permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on the 9th April, 2018. Your assistance will be gladly welcome..... Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 14:39, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Perfect! @Olaniyan Olushola: The current backlog is of 61 days because of lack of active volunteers. So please wait for a couple of months before having this ticket processed. --Ruthven (msg) 09:28, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:28, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

File:אשרה אלקיים רונן.tif and File:אשרה אלקיים רונן - אדם וחווה.jpg

Hi there, I sent approval for both those images, the aaprovals are from Oshra herself. Is there anything I should do more? I am helping her with this but I am now an expert... thanks! Heblit16 (talk) 22:53, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Heblit16, regarding to File:אשרה אלקיים רונן.tif You do have respond in your mail from 9 January 2018. If you don't speak Hebrew please say so. -- Geagea (talk) 03:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Geagea I speak Hebrew but I dont see any mail... Heblit16 (talk) 15:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

@Heblit16: Please check your spam folder.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

talk to me To which email your refering? can you please send it here maybe? Heblit16 (talk) 18:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

@Heblit16: For each, who is the photographer who took the picture? When and under what circumstances was the photo taken?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 19:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Jeff According to Oshra herself, it was taken by a firend (who passed away a long time ago) and was given to her and everyone can use it since there are no rights. Heblit16 (talk) 16:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

@Heblit16: It is likely that the rights of the friend passed to the friend's heirs or the state. Without permission from them, or documentation that the friend died more than 50-70 years ago per COM:CRT#Israel, we must apply COM:PRP, assume the heirs or state still hold those rights, and delete these photos.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Jeff, it was just a friend taking it for Oshra and gave it to her, if you will search online you will see the images also appear on http://archive.batsheva.co.il/heb/repertoire.php?act=photos&id=29. I am sire I can get them to approve as well if needed. The rights were never claimed and the friend gave Osra the negatives even... Heblit16 (talk) 12:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Jeff, I told Oshra about the whole thing and she contacted the man who took the pictuers's son. Which approval is needed? he is willing to help since he also knows it was given to her for by his father... please let me know asap since he lives in the us. thanks, Heblit16 (talk) 08:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

@Heblit16: Please have him email us, copy you, and add the following to the subject bar of the email message: [Ticket#: 2018010910007254]. We also need permission of the photographer of File:אשרה אלקיים רונן - אדם וחווה.jpg for Ticket:2018011410006343.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

G. ツ, email you in his own words saying that his father took the pictuers and gave them to Oshra? and also to which email, the regular one? thanks Heblit16 (talk) 11:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

@Heblit16: Yes, permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Also, mentions of User:Jeff G./talk don't work, please ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

talk to me Hope I did it right :) I asked him to send and Oshra talked with him a well since she knows him personally. Hope it will work and pass. Thanks! Heblit16 (talk) 16:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:44, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Perjalanan Hidup Saya.pdf -- copyright holder email

The copyright holder (son of author) has sent an email verifying that File:Perjalanan Hidup Saya.pdf is released under CC0 license. Can anyone verify? Also, the book does not have information regarding who made the book cover (pages 1-2, page 2 is the back cover which in turn contains the blurb which I regard as part of the book), will it be redacted from the uploaded file? _{— Aumars (talk) 19:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)}

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the image will be restored automatically when and if the e-mail is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the e-mail is processed and the image is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the e-mail has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 10:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

That didn't answer my question, so I'll assume leaving the first two pages of the PDF should be fine. Ticket number is Ticket:2018022510004028, the email registered the file as "Perjalanan_Hidup_Saya.pdf" although the real uploaded file doesn't contain underscores. I don't think the automated system will realise that, it would be great if an admin could do it manually for a minute. Thanks in advance. _{— Aumars (talk) 10:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)}

Underscores and spaces are equivalent in MediaWiki page names. In the visible form spaces are shown whereas respective canonical URLs contain underscores instead. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. May I have an update on the ticket? It's been more than two weeks since I've uploaded the file and there has been no response. I hope there are no problems with it. — Aumars (talk) 12:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

@Aumars: Generally e-mails are answered in 2 months due to the lack of volunteers. You've received an answer now, please solve the issue with OTRS. --Ruthven (msg) 18:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Save Cambodias Wildlife logo.jpg

Could an OTRS volunteer could quickly check the ticket for File:Save Cambodias Wildlife logo.jpg to make sure it's OK? The file was tagged with {{Npd}} and the uploader stated they were working on having an email sent in to OTRS. However, that was yesterday and the file has already been tagged with {{PermissionOTRS}} by Taketa. The edit sum which was left states "OTRS permission added by non-OTRS member", which is something I don't think I've seen before since I thought only OTRS volunteers could review permission's email, etc. Anyway, if everything is fine, then cool; however, OTRS verification generally seems to take more than a day in most cases, so I'm just checking on this to make sure. If there's a still problem, I'd like to let the uploader know so that can take steps to remedy it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

My global OTRS rights and access were removed today due to inactivity. However access has been restored immediately (and I decided to use it) [4]. An OTRS admin however still has to make a request to restore the global right, so it doesn't report an error on Commons [5]. All the best, Taketa (talk) 22:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying things Taketa. Since you're back doing OTRS stuff, maybe the permission's email for this file could also cover File:Save Cambodia's Wildlife.jpg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:07, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly, unfortunately the ticket only covers the logo. As I am not a commons admin I cannot see the deleted file, so I cannot say anything more on the matter. All the best, Taketa (talk) 00:27, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: It's the same logo. It's pointless to have two versions of the same file (even if the deleted version looks slightly better). --Ruthven (msg) 13:35, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Shorwell helmet replica.jpg

Would someone please look to see if OTRS has been received for this file? It is needed as part of a featured article candidate (Shorwell helmet; discussion here), to replace a fair use image that came under question. Just got an email from the copyright holder, and he said he sent the required email (possibly in addition to the online form) eight days ago. Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 19:30, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

@Usernameunique: 8 days is kind of early, but I don't understand why he hasn't changed the license on Flickr. --Ruthven (msg) 20:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Ruthven, that was my first suggestion too, but he doesn't remember his Flickr password, and they wouldn't allow him access back in. I understand that the backlog takes priority—I'm waiting on several dozen photographs from early February myself—but hope that to help a featured article candidacy an exception might be made. This image was uploaded during the FAC to replace an image where the fair use rationale was questioned. Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 21:06, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

@Usernameunique: I found their email: ticket:2018032610012971. Unfortunately, it appears the copyright holder used their personal email. We need them to use their official email that's listed on their website in order for us to verify that it's actually them. I've sent a reply outlining this. Mz7 (talk) 23:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks very much for looking into this, Mz7. Hopefully you get what you need. If it would help, I could also forward the email chain I have with the copyright holder; I emailed the official email address and received a response from a personal email address, so theoretically the chain can be used to connect the two. --Usernameunique (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

@Usernameunique: Heard back from them. The permission is now  confirmed. Mz7 (talk) 02:11, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

That's great, thanks again for taking the lead on this and following up Mz7! --Usernameunique (talk) 02:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Vladimir Belyaev (Charm.ru)

I asked Vladimir Belyaev of Charm.ru and Zeno.ru if he could create an OTRS ticket 🎟 and he responded with that a volunteer asked what type of template was needed, I had later advised him on what type of license he could use but I am not certain if the ticket sent by Mr. Vladimir Belyaev could be properly processed, if there are any issues with the permission Mr. Vladimir Belyaev has given for Charm.ru may I know them so I can address these to him? --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:47, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

P.S. (Post-Script) I am unfamiliar which ticket number Mr. Vladimir Belyaev has received, this is the only information he has provided me and since we both are very busy people our communication has been kept to a minimum. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:49, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Additional information, I had originally asked Mr. Vladimir Belyaev to donate his images in either June 2017 or July 2017 so it's possible that he is still replying to an older ticket. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:01, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: I replied to you on 6 September 2017 with a copy to Mr. Vladimir Belyaev using his address that you quoted on Ticket:2017071010012665, specifying that we cannot accept forwarded permissions and how to send us valid permissions directly. Sadly, I have not heard back from either of you on that ticket via email, and we have no record of having received any email message from that address. There is more background information in our archives leading up to that ticket here, there, and at combined Ticket:2017070910004015.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:46, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Alright, then I know enough and will attempt to contact Mr. Vladimir Belyaev again so I can try to get him to give more proper permission, you can mark this section as resolved. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:48, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 01:31, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Vanda Biffani.jpg

Is this valid permission? IMO almost for sure it isn't. --jdx ^Re: 05:53, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jdx: Yeah, I don't think so. This (probably invalid) ticket number appears to have been copied and pasted on many images. Alex Shih (talk) 06:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jdx and Alex Shih: Ticket:2008042810014876 is referenced on some 603 pages, but I cannot access it. Please see this edit by @Elitre for details.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

The permission is valid (but not in particular for this file, as no source has been provided). The ticket indicates a choosen license: "CC-BY-SA-2.5 (and any later version)", and permits the usage of the photos in the photographer's archives, given that the credits are given to "Vincenzo Iaconianni – www.fotoguru.it". --Ruthven (msg) 14:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 14:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Interactive release generator

Could someone please let me know how long it normally takes for a file to be updated when a copyright holder uses this tool? A representative for the copyright holder of File:Gevninge helmet fragment - 150x105.png told me he "filled out the permission form" on 12 April, which I took to mean him using the online tool (which is what I linked him to), but the permission has not yet been acknowledged.

Never having used the interactive release generator myself, I'm a bit confused by the process. I've asked people to use it three times (also with File:Shorwell helmet replica.jpg and File:William Chaney.jpg), but in only one of those cases (William Chaney) did it work quickly. Is there also an email component to the tool, or something that requires a manual step by an OTRS volunteer? Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 20:33, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

@Usernameunique: Items are not reviewed in the order they are received. We try but we are all volunteers and we try to get through them as quickly and efficiently as we can. The backlog current stretches to 57 days but that doesn't mean that it will take that long. The entire process is done via email and the tool directs you to email the form once you get to that step (or automatically through your preferred email application). As long as there is {{subst:OP}} on the file information page in question the image will be fine. --Majora (talk) 20:38, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Majora, thanks for clearing that up. I hadn't realized that there is an email component of the form that still requires manual review; perhaps because of the extremely fast turnaround (5 hours) the first time it was used (the William Chaney file), I thought it was an automated process, and therefore did not queue the files with the rest of the backlog. Happy to sit patiently now that I know how it works. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

/ Ticket:2018032210012522

I uploaded that file on February 18, but it was deleted on March 9th.

I told the Photograph to send the permission that I stated I would have via mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Nina Jakešová did that on March 22 (Ticket:2018032210012522). But the image has still not been restored. Is there anything we can to to restore it?

--Wedderkop (talk) 08:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. @Wedderkop: Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}}?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

No, I haven't yet. --Wedderkop (talk) 15:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Well, the file will be restored when the ticket will be processed successfully; in one month approx. --Ruthven (msg) 16:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Please restore the file AbdulKarim Abdullah Al-Arashi.jpg

The declaration of consent for the file AbdulKarim Abdullah Al-Arashi.jpg was sent on the 02/04/18 and resent again on 10th. Thank you for understanding.--Aceat (talk) 21:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

@Aceat:  The backlog is 2 months long approx. Please be patient. :This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 18:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Hertha_Jugl-Jennewein_vor_der_Staffelei.jpg

Guten Tag. Die Rechteinhaberin hat am 28. Februar 2018, 10 Uhr 37, eine unterzeichnete Freigabeerklärung an die permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org gemailt. Nun wurde das Bild auf Commons gelöscht, vermutlich ohne dass die Freigabeerklärung bearbeitet worden wäre. Könnt ihr dies bitte jetzt noch nachholen? https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Hertha_Jugl-Jennewein_vor_der_Staffelei.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 Vielen Dank --Hadi (talk) 09:00, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für das Nachhaken, Hadi. Es liegt in der Tat eine Freigabeerklärung vor (ticket:2018022810005316), die aber so leider noch nicht ausreichend ist. Ich habe das Ticket jetzt übernommen und hoffe, dass sich alles bald klären lässt. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 08:38, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Do I have to worry?

Some items I uploaded like File:Tự Đức Thông Bảo (嗣德通寶) - Art-Hanoi 06.jpg are in the category Category:Media contributed by Art Hanoi, but it's been a while and several individual media files 📁 still don't have this OTRS ticket mentioned on them, does this mean that they'll first get deleted after 30 (thirty) days and will then be restored? Or will they simply get the ticket later as there's a huge backlog? I am asking this as I am writing about Vietnamese cash coins on Wikipedia and don't want the CommonsDelinker to remove several images with a valid ticket attached to them. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 01:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

If you don't indicate to the OTRS agents that you've uploaded new files, it is difficult that the permission template appears by itself. We've not implemented the second sight in the toolsuite (but we're working on it). Ruthven (msg) 06:34, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, at least now I know what to do when I'll import the University of California at Santa Barbara images from Drm luke Roberts later, thank you very much for all your hard work. To my understanding first upload, and then tell the agent that you've uploaded the files, I will do that with all the scans from Dr. Luke Roberts the moment that that OTRS ticket 🎟 has been processed, have a nice day.

@Donald Trung: Also notice that the whole category has a OTRS permission confimed, so maybe it's not necessary to add single permissions to the files, as long as the exact source URL is specified. Cheers --Ruthven (msg) 08:37, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 06:34, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Lyombe Eko and Roy Bennett 2011.jpg

I see that the image File:Lyombe Eko and Roy Bennett 2011.jpg was deleted. However, the copyright holder told me that the email statement was sent on or around February 10–12, 2018. I don't know the ticket number, but I'm certain that the email is in the queue. --George Ho (talk) 03:56, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

@George Ho: Sorry, I couldn't find "Lyombe" in a full text search of our database. Please have the copyright holder provide the ticket number or other unique text to serarch for, or copy you on the next message.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Here you go: ticket:2018021210011731. --George Ho (talk) 16:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

 Done --Ruthven (msg) 18:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 18:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Osmaromneto

Would you mind expediting the check for these images, as I suspect that they are copyright violations and that the uploader is simply abusing the {{OTRS pending}} tag to delay deletion? People who have obtained permission to publish photos under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike from the copyright holder would typically know the identity of the author whom they're legally obliged to credit and would typically not have to download the photos from Google Images. Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 12:07, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Wouldn't this better fit at the administrators' noticeboard? And did you explain to them when to use the OTRS pending template? Maybe they are not aware that the template doesn't automatically invite the copyright holder to release the image, but a stern warning and an explanation of how both Wikimedia Commons and the OTRS works would be in place. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

It seems everywhere I post on Commons these days, somebody wants me to use another venue... This is the appropriate place to ask OTRS volunteers to check if there is any merit to the uploader's claims that "An email containing details of the permission for this file has been sent in accordance with Commons:OTRS." Administrators who don't have access to OTRS cannot check that. I also don't see why anyone would think that saying that a permission from the copyright holder has already been sent would automatically figure out who the copyright holder is and ask them to do stuff which should have already been done before uploading. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:38, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Those are valid points as I had assumed that the uploader may have simply used it as a tactic to avoid deletion, I will ping the uploader now: @Osmaromneto: so they can respond and explain their position. Indeed the AN is probably better for more obvious copyright violators and it's entirely possible that Osmaromneto is a good faith user. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:51, 14 April 2018 (UTC)|

So we have 4 files uploaded by Osmaromneto on 9 April from 19:12 to 19:24 UTC, all with photography of Kpop (Korean popular music) group "Stellar" from their minialbum covers via Google Images, small with no usable EXIF data, in Category:Stellar. I have tagged 2 of them as dups of File:Stellar kpop group 2017.jpg. Of course, there were no matching OTRS tickets found. I have tagged all as copyvios and fraudulent.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:54, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 11:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

ticket:2018010610004315, ticket:2018031310010336 and File:Baker's Apprentice (self portrait).jpg

Please check ticket:2018010610004315 (failed attempt) vs ticket:2018031310010336 (newest permission) and restore File:Baker's Apprentice (self portrait).jpg. Thank you! -- Fidelecourt (talk) 01:58, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

@JuTa: Fidelecourt (talk) 23:26, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

@Fidelecourt:  Done --Ruthven (msg) 09:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

ticket #2017072510011594 Request for archived correspondence

Could you please provide me with the archived correspondence for ticket #2017072510011594 Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2017072510011594 File:Life around jungle.jpg File URL: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Life_around_jungle.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by CopyEditor14063 (talk • contribs) 10:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

@CopyEditor14063: Sorry, we could not due to our privacy policy. However, you may converse with the uploader User:Pallabkabir.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:49, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:40, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Tttom aka User:TTThom

This user identified himself as the artist Tom Loback (see also Category:Drawings by Tom Loback). In 2010 I asked him at en.wiki to send a permissions email to Commons, and he replied that he would do so. Did OTRS ever get a mail confirming this user's identy? I'm asking because in the course of a Wikipedia content discussion it turned out that Loback died apparently in March 2015 [6]. This would coincide with the absence of User:Tttom since January 2015. De728631 (talk) 01:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

@De728631: Yes, the author wrote in 2010 with ticket:2010081410001091 putting 17 of his artworks under GNU Free Documentation License, but the OTRS agent wasn't able to check his identity at the time. I reckon that now knowing the background, we can accept the release. Any thoughts? --Ruthven (msg) 09:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Even better, with a brief research on Google, it was possible to confirm the permission (being an OTRS agent is a little like being a detective). Adding OTRS template to the authorised images. --Ruthven (msg) 10:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 10:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

City of Orlando on Flickr (#2017120410010589)

Hi all, can someone please take a look at User talk:Flominator/Flinfo#Whitelist addition? Thanks in advance, --Flominator (talk) 09:31, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

@Flominator: In progress.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 20:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

 On hold pending a reply from the City.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:50, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

@Flominator: I replied on your talk page.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 20:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 20:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Patnixonpark.jpg

The sculptor sent an email on February 18 regarding File:Patnixonpark.jpg, seen at Ticket:2018021810007477; the Commons copy of the photo was deleted a couple years ago. --George Ho (talk) 03:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

@George Ho: This is being handled off-wiki.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:28, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Ticket:2018032610007951

I'm working with Memorial Sloan Kettering and Juliana Thomas (the photographer of the image in question) to upload this photo to Commons for use on W:José Baselga. However, I noticed that another copy of this image was previously uploaded incorrectly, without proper permissions here. I believe the original uploader was an MSK employee and unfamiliar with the proper protocols, but is no longer responsible for anything Wikimedia-related. Would it be best to update that file with the proper permissions, or re-upload this photo and tag it with this ticket number for review?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 18:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

@CandiceTHOPP: Who took this photo, you or Juliana Thomas? @FacultiesIntact: Thanks for asking. Can we get the original 4,256 × 2,832 pixels version?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 22:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I can look into getting the original version, but all I have at the moment is a slightly improved 1280 x 852. I believe it was submitted under the ticket number above. Thanks for the help! I'll let you know when I hear back about the original.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

I don't have the original photo, and I'm not sure when I'll be able to track it down, as it's a bit difficult to coordinate all the parties involved. What would be the best way to proceed for the time being?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 19:46, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I know you guys always have your hands full, but I wanted to check in and see if there's anything else I can do to help in the meantime! I'm unsure if CandiceTHOPP is still working for MSK, but she's been inactive on Commons and Wikipedia for nearly 3 years now.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 19:30, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

@FacultiesIntact: It's been over a week, I don't think CandiceTHOPP is coming back. Please upload the 1280 x 852 version and ping me. I'll tag it. For efficiency, please ask your customers to carbon copy you on OTRS email messages they send.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Thanks again for all the help. I am incredibly appreciative of all the work you do here. I uploaded the new version here; this one has the accent mark in "José". I'll make sure that I get cc'd on all future communications to help smooth things out. Cheers!--FacultiesIntact (talk) 17:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

@FacultiesIntact:  Done.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Brian Watson, candidate for Colorado State Treasurer 2018.jpg

Got a weird situation on File:Brian Watson, candidate for Colorado State Treasurer 2018.jpg, where the uploader has linked to a PDF version of the email they sent to OTRS nearly a year ago. Could someone please see if that email actually exists in OTRS, and if so, add the ticket number? Thanks, IagoQnsi (talk) 02:42, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Can't see the PDF, but I did find ticket:2017050510000021 which does not contain evidence of permission. The last email sent was by us in June 2017, with no response. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:56, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 22:15, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

File:LogoGakkuDausy.svg based on File:Logo Gakku Dausy.png

Hello, can I ask the OTRS to be put on the svg file? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Respublika Narodnaya (talk • contribs) 08:08, 28 April 2018‎ (UTC)

@Respublika Narodnaya:  Done.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 22:14, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Use of image

Hi,

I am trying to reuse an image under the commons creative license. I have read the guidance on the site and I am not requesting permission to use this image. However, I am trying to clarify some details. Under the wikimedia commons the image is free to use and reproduce as long as the image is attributed to the original source. However, the original source has requested a fee to reuse the image. This seems to be at odds with the wikimedia commons advice and the information for licensing listed on the page. Could you please review the accuracy of this or explain further? The file in question; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blausen_0723_Pelvis.png

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.255.119.220 (talk) 16:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Requesting a fee is not acceptable for us, nor compatible to the Creative Commons licenses we use. But here this file is released under CC BY 3.0, which allows to reuse, distribute, and modify it given that the original source/author is cited; which would be here: "Blausen.com staff (2014). "Medical gallery of Blausen Medical 2014". WikiJournal of Medicine 1 (2). DOI:10.15347/wjm/2014.010. ISSN 2002-4436." --Ruthven (msg) 15:41, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 13:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

[Ticket#: 2018042510002179]

Regarding these [| files] I have obtained the original file owners official public domain release permission and sent the letter to the commons at: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org 25hrs ago. But the images deletion notices not getting removed. The ticket number is [Ticket#: 2018042510002179] Just wondering when will the case be solved and the deletion notices be removed. Thank you. Orgio89 (talk) 05:12, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

@Orgio89: OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the e-mail is processed.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:05, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 06:10, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Energica Ego

Hi, I will like to know if you have received OTRS confirmation on Files I had uploaded: File:Energica Ego.jpg , File:Energica Ego 2.jpg , and File:Energica Ego Corsa MOTOE 2.jpg . Thanks--Navinsingh133 (talk) 11:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

@Navinsingh133: Sorry, no email messages in the past five years mentioned "Energica".   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:45, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Its okay @Jeff G.: , Thanks for helping me. --Navinsingh133 (talk) 22:13, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

@Navinsingh133: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 22:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 06:10, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Contradiction of terms

The following files uploaded by y Xenxax are assessed as {{PD-Italia}} and yet an OTRS has been created. How comes ?

• File:Ugo Ceseri 1939.jpg
• File:Arturo Ambrosio.jpg
• File:Franz sala.jpg
• File:Vittorio Rossi Pianelli.jpg
• File:Il teschio d'oro.jpg
• File:Giuseppe De Liguoro 1913.jpg.

— Racconish ^☎ 16:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

@Racconish: From my reading of a Google Translated version of this 7-year old ticket in Italian, there is no direct permission, no approval, and certainly no authorization for non-members to pretend that there is such approval.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:25, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

@Racconish: @Jeff G.: I didn't add the OTRS ... all of them were was done by OgreBot 2. The above photos are old and all in use on the Italian Wikipedia; some are also used on other European Wikipedia. That's all I know. - Xenxax (talk) 16:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: Why did your bot upload such files here?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:39, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

I don't think it's a problem to have uploaded these PD images to Commons. But it seems absurd to specify an OTRS authorization for a PD file. — Racconish ^☎ 16:44, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: you are mistaken; my bot didn't upload these images. Please look again at the page history. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: Sorry, I relied on this edit of 16:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC) above.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

The OTRS is originally for it.wiki only, but then, files considered as PD-Italy have been uploaded as such (they were published on two Italian magazines between 1915 and 1935: "Museo Nazionale del Cinema" e "Museo Nazionale del Cinema - Bibliomediateca"), an consequently transferred to Commons. I reckon that the {{PermissionOTRS}} template can be transformed to {{OTRS info}}.--Ruthven (msg) 22:10, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 08:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

ticket:2009012710014989

Does this also cover File:Marsheauxflowers2.jpg? The image was deleted because of missing permission while File:Marsheauxflowers.jpg by the same uploader has this OTRS ticket. De728631 (talk) 12:23, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Doesn't look like it - Cameron¹¹⁵⁹⁸_(talk) 22:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@De728631: As Cameron said: the source might be the same, but the ticket covers only File:Marsheauxflowers.jpg. --Ruthven (msg) 07:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Ticket 2018041510000234

I'm not getting a response via email as to whether the necessary steps have been taken to resolve this ticket. An update would be appreciated, thanks. ATS (talk) 00:12, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

@ATS: The average response time is 76 days. Please wait at least on month more, because we are lacking active OTRS agents that answer the emails. --Ruthven (msg) 07:25, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Ruthven. ATS (talk) 18:47, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:25, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Letter from Dr./Prof. Luke Roberts

Dr./Prof. Luke Roberts of the University of California at Santa Barbara told me that he had sent an electronic letter confirming that the images of his website can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, I am just posting this here to confirm the ticket 🎟 so I can start importing the images from his personal website at the University of California at Santa Barbara. I will create the maintenance ⛑🏻 category Category:Media contributed by Dr. Luke Roberts (UCSB) in the meantime and request that an OTRS agent will add the appropriate OTRS ticket 🎟 to this category. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:05, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

For informational purposes the OTRS ticket 🎟 number Dr./Prof. Luke Roberts received is Ticket:2018032110011865. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

The ticket does not contain a free license permission. In case of photos of coins, only the photos which are freely licensed by authors may be stored in Wikimedia Commons. Ankry (talk) 06:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Ah, alright J will contact the author again and ask him to give proper permission. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:58, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: Please double check that he's the author of the shots. It seems that not all the files on his website are his own work, e.g. he cannot give us a release for a scan of an old book. --Ruthven (msg) 08:35, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: indeed, nor does he have to because I uploaded those scans many months ago because they are in the public domain, they're made during the Tolugawa Shogunate and their copyrights have long expired both in Japan and elsewhere, I think that the older of the books is from the 1790's which if only scanned can't possibly be copyrighted no matter who made the scan. I'm not even sure if any Tokugawa Shogunate era (Edo Period) works can be considered copyrighted under current Japanese laws. He did confirm that he is the author of all other images on the websites, the images that aren't authored by Dr./Prof. Luke S. Roberts are PD-scans. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:28, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

I would like to quote Dr./Prof. Luke Roberts from an e-mail 📧 he sent at 02:45 21 D. 03 M. 2018 A., as far as I know citing such a small piece is fair use and feel free to oversight this edit if it's not allowed but the quote is There are two pages for which you may not use the images:

• 1. * http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/roberts/coins/Kosennedanstuke/index.html

These images I already uploaded at * Category:Shinpan kaisei, Kosen nedantsuke, Narabi ni bantsuki.

this page is a set of photographs of a book which I do not own. Therefore you may not use it in Wikimedia Commons 2. http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/roberts/coins/manufacture.html this page uses photographs from a published book and I have no rights over the images. Therefore you may not use them in Wikimedia commons. Yours, Luke Roberts

And these at Category:Kokin kousei, Shinsen zeni kagami. So as far as I can tell the only images he can't give permission for are the ones we don't need permission for. PS if the ticket 🎟 gets processed please notify me on my talk page with the license template, I am very busy in real life right now and don't have much time to regularly check back. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Update: Dr./Prof. Luke S. Roberts confirmed with me that he has sent the appropriate permission license to the Wikimedia Commons OTRS team, I personally have no hurry in uploading these images as I still have a huge project on Wikipedia I need to finish first so in no way does any OTRS volunteer need to place this ticket above any other, just notify me on my talk page what template I should use for copyright © after this OTRS ticket has been fully processed. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: The OTRS process has gone through. You can use {{East Asian Cash Coins}} when uploading (strictly limiting the uploads to Luke Shepherd Roberts' photos only, as specified in the template); the media files will be directly categorised in the (hidden) category "Media contributed by East Asian Cash Coins". --Ruthven (msg) 17:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 17:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

File:J-P.LHESSE.jpg

Bonsoir, l'on m'a demandé de patienter en attendant une réponse, les tickets ont été envoyé, on m'a demandé un moi, cela fait plus d'un moi, peut-on me renseigner ? :) merci bien Samuelelbaz (talk) 19:04, 18 April 2018 (UTC)samuel Elbaz

{{subst:Image permission|File:J-P.LHESSE.jpg}} Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Bonsoir, suite à un avertissement me demandant de confirmer mes droits sur cette photo, j'ai recontacter le modèle de la photo Jean-Pascal Hesse et le photographe Frédéric Goudon pour leur donner leur autorisation de laisser les droits sur la photos et donc de pouvoir l'utiliser sur Wikipédia. Ils ont reçu un ticket chacun, je trouve que déplacer de supprimer alors que je me plie à la procédure, que j'ai une semaine pour justifier et que sur moi supprimer si vite cette photo alors que sur l'information que pour répondre au ticket cela est beaucoup plus long! Comment faire restaure l'image? Merci bien. - Précédente commentaire non signé ajouté par Samuelelbaz ( discussion • contributions ) 20:20,

@ Samuelelbaz : Bonjour, Avez-vous le numéro du ticket? Veuillez noter qu'une "autorisation pour Wikipedia" n'est pas suffisante. Il faut une autorisation pour une licence libre. Ce n'est pas nécessaire de réimporter le fichier. Il sera restauré quand l'autorisation est validée. Cordialement, Yann ( parler ) 04:16, 17 mars 2018 (UTC) Version anglaise courte: Avez-vous le numéro de ticket? Une autorisation "pour Wikipedia" n'est pas suffisante. Nous avons besoin d'une permission pour une licence gratuite. Et il n'est pas nécessaire de réimporter le fichier, il sera supprimé une fois l'autorisation validée. Bonjour, merci de votre réponse: @ Yann :, L'un des deux billet est: Ticket: 2018031610009057 le deuxième, je suis en attente mais celui-ci fut envoyé.

Tout deux sur la copie suivante: Commons: Email_templates / Consentement , l'affirmant céder ses droits en tant que modèle, l'autre en tant que photographe.

Je vous remercie de l'aide et espérons voir la situation se régler au plus vite. merci bien. Samuel ELBAZ. - Précédente commentaire non signé ajouté par Samuelelbaz ( discussion • contributions ) 13h13, 17 mars 2018 (UTC)

Symbole opposé vote.svg S'opposerCet utilisateur ne sait pas ou a choisi de ne pas partager tout l'historique de cette image. Le DR original était

Commons: Demandes de suppression / Fichier: JEAN-PASCAL HESSE.jpg (téléchargement de l'image par l' utilisateur: Jean-Pascal Hesse ) et ce fichier a été supprimé car l'image était apparue précédemment sur Facebook. Le même téléchargeur a ensuite téléchargé la même image que

Fichier: JEANPASCALHESSE.jpg Il a été supprimé en tant que recréation de contenu précédemment supprimé. Ensuite, Utilisateur: Samuelbaz a téléchargé la même image que

Fichier: JP.LHESSE.jpg et elle aussi a été supprimée en tant que récréation.

Si, au lieu de recharger le fichier sous les deuxième et troisième noms, les deux utilisateurs avaient fait une demande ici après la première suppression le 14 février, l' e-mail OTRS serait aujourd'hui à la tête de la file d'attente. Je ne vois aucune raison de récompenser la violation de nos règles en permettant à ce fichier de sauter la file d'attente à OTRS. Nous devrions le laisser attendre que la licence atteigne la tête de la file d'attente OTRS dans un mois ou deux. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) ( parle avec moi )

Jim , je pense que ces gens ont agi de bonne foi, mais ils sont assez confus au sujet du droit d'auteur et des exigences des Communes. De toute façon, nous n'avons pas (encore) la permission du photographe. Il semble qu'ils pensent d'abord que la permission doit être donnée par le sujet. La file d'attente OTRS en langue française était assez courte, mais elle a encore grossi. Nous pouvons fermer ceci jusqu'à ce qu'une permission arrive. Cordialement, Yann ( parler ) 06:06, 18 mars 2018 (UTC)

Jim , Yann . En effet, il ya eu plusieurs maladies de mon côté, la première image a été postée à ma demande par le modèle de la photo Jean-Pascal Hesse, celui-ci a été supprimé car il ne savait rien à wiki. La deuxième fois, il y a une erreur, elle a été tracée, ainsi que la troisième que j'ai eu l'effet remis au nom de * File: JP.LHESSE.jpg vu que le deuxième avait pas été bien chargé et espérant gagner du temps. Jim, je vous invite à bien regarder l'heure et le jour où la deuxième et la troisième sur l'été ont vu que vous aimez la précision, par ailleurs, j'ai demandé téléchargement Ainsi, après la publication pour la troisième fois pour cette photo, j'ai reçu un avertissement me définissant une semaine pour que la personne ayant les droits de la photos envoient un message à: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Chose faite, et dans Jean-Pascal Hesse, et le photographe, Frédéric Goudon, ont souhaité un message affirmatif et acceptent les conditions de Wikipédia. Jean-Pascal Hesse Billet: 2018031610009057 Frédéric Goudon [Ticket # 2018031610011035]

Je ne savais pas vous répondre aux coups, je fais le sur ma page personnel

Merci Bien de vos conseils, je ferrai en sorte de faire mieux par la suite.

Samuelelbaz ( parler ) 18:38, 18 mars 2018 (UTC) Samuel ELBAZ

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 22:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

• J'espère que ce ne soit pas un cas de personalités multiples ;) Le temps d'attente est de 74 jours en moyenne. Je vous invite donc à patienter encore un peu. --Ruthven (msg) 22:08, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour @Ruthven: , thanks for . your message and your encouragement Samuelelbaz (talk) 21:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Samuel ELBAZ

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 22:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Vandeweerdt1.JPG

Can somebody clarify the license on File:Vandeweerdt1.JPG? I'm not sure if a) the artist Dirk Vandeweerdt and User:Wasily are supposed to be the same person, or if User:Wasily just took the photo. Also, b) is the public domain license correct? Thanks. --ghouston (talk) 04:50, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

@Ghouston: You should ask @Wasily.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

The permission is correct according to the email in OTRS. Ciell (talk) 17:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, that the PD dedication is correct is the main thing. It would be nice to get the attributions right too. I guess I will have to ask Wasily, who seems to be still active occasionally. --ghouston (talk) 04:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I'm afraid I cannot answer that question for you. I checked the old log of the file on nl: Wikipedia (I'm an admin there), but that isn't more specific on the matter than what it says on Commons. Ciell (talk) 08:28, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 22:16, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

File:AlanAmron.jpg and File:Original sticky notes invention drawings Amron 1973.png

Something is odd about the verified permission for these files. The photo was created by Edijs Pālens[7], while the drawing was supposedly created by Alan Amron. However, the uploader is attributed as the author of both files (under different usernames following a rename). Since the uploader can't be two persons at once, at least one of those attributions (which are legally required by the license and thus expected to be verified as part of the OTRS approval) would seem to be incorrect. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:31, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

And also File:Alan Amron Inventor Sticky Notes Lecturer.jpg.

The tickets seem to me to be OK. However, image info needed some fixes indeed. Ankry (talk) 19:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 22:14, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Replacement for a not-too-flattering photo was send to OTRS

Commons:Help desk#Robert Dölle

Follow-up: User talk:Alexis Jazz#Robert Dölle profile pic

This is about Robert Dölle. (registered here under the same name, not mentioning on purpose) He has an article on dewiki: w:de:Robert Dölle with a photo that is completely legit, but not very flattering. We told him to give us a better photo.

He claims to have mailed a better photo to OTRS and he's really eager to see his photo replaced on dewiki and I can kind of understand that. I will take care of replacing the photo on wikis that use it, if somebody could look for his mail that would be great. I understand there is a queue, if he just has to wait in line I'll tell him, but I understand his wish to see it replaced as soon as possible. I don't know if he gave OTRS File:38 1509 galerie.jpg or another photo. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 12:31, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: I didn't see such a claim to have emailed, nor did I see such an email message. I am conversing with him at User talk:Robert Dölle.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:16, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

It's how I understood his message, he didn't link to his user page. I guess he just meant he gave you a link to a photo without a free license. Bummer. Thanks. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 14:55, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 20:38, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

ticket:2017090710014111

Hi, I would like to have opinions whether the files are derivative worlks or not. Also pinging @Yoanmb: for input. Ticket in French. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: They are DW for sure, otherwise, if there were an official work for hire, the State would hold the copyright. We've to check if such coat of arms are free of rights in their home country. But asking to the customer for a clarification –explaining him the issue– would be a good idea. --Ruthven (msg) 20:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 10:27, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Themepark pictures

2,5 weeks ago I send for these files:andthe new permission text by mail, after somebody of the OTRS-community asked me. I've never get a message back. But now the files has been removed. Did I do something wrong? --Mw007 (talk) 19:32, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

@Mw007: Re Ticket:2018022510003252, we still need permission from the copyright holder which complies with COM:L and COM:CONSENT.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 20:01, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for reaction. I send the new permission 2,5 weeks ago. I 'll send it again. --Mw007 (talk) 10:19, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

@Mw007: When sending a new email, do not forget to add "Ticket#2018022510003252" in the subject line, otherwise the mail can be lost. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 10:22, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: Thanks for the tip! --Mw007 (talk) 15:01, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Re: Ticket 2018041510000234

@Ruthven: and @Jcb: I was just notified a week ago that average response time is 76 days; File:Cami Bradley.jpg and File:The Sweeplings - Black Shoot-26.jpg have both been deleted for "No OTRS permission for 30 days". Can someone PLEASE help me resolve this? Thank you. ATS (talk) 01:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

@ATS: Please expect an answer around 25 June.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 02:01, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: appreciate the reply. Why, then, delete the files? ATS (talk)

@ATS: It's a good question. In reality we keep the files without permission for one month, approx. However, due to the lack of active OTRS agents, the answer time is longer. In any case do not worry, the file will be restored when the permission will be processed. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 07:43, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

@ATS: In order to avoid deletion during pending OTRS operations, please ensure permission tickets issuing from the actual author and containing a permissible license have been submitted prior to, or at the time of, upload. We cannot keep files that depend on inadequate tickets around indefinitely in the hope that the surrounding questions eventually clear. As a rule of thumb, because volunteer time is stretched extremely thin and because volunteers are, well, volunteers, the realpolitik is that simple tickets with a straightforward story and one incoming email are given priority. Those that started with issues and have required a back-and-forth or two stand an unfortunate chance of being deleted before a volunteer can check to see whether the latest response has been adequate. Storkk (talk) 09:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Storkk. I did indeed wait until the email with the proper release was sent to Permissions, unaware that the prior back-and-forth might be somehow problematic. ATS (talk) 18:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

@ATS: They probably didn't contain {{subst:OP}} or the resultant template, which today would expand to {{OTRS pending|year=2018|month=May|day=23}}.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Storkk (talk) 09:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Review key image

I am having trouble getting photos I owned reviewed for associations with the Wiki page about myself. This one is my property but was deleted. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patrick_Sweeney_%26_Rebecca_Rusch_unsupported_cycle_to_summit_of_Kilimanjaro.jpg Please have someone review this. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.251.75.116 (talk) 09:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@PJSweeney007: As we wrote you on 1 March, we need permission from the photographer for that photo at Ticket:2018012010005323. We have not yet heard from them.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:36, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Well, searching for mails from the same customer might help. Ticket closed successfully. --Ruthven (msg) 10:23, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: I tried that. I can see no other tickets for this customerid. If any do exist, I would like access to them. This section is about the one file in that ticket for which we don't yet have permission from the photographer.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:29, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I merged an old ticket to the thread. Now that the ticket was answered, we're just waiting for the permission from the photographer of the "summit_of_Kilimanjaro" photo. Ruthven (msg) 12:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 12:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Isabel del Puerto pictures

• File:Isabel del Puerto austro mexican movie.jpg

Something fishy here: it says that the subject of the photograph also is the author! Isn't this an error? It doesn't look like a typical selfie.

---

• File:06 I del P current life.jpg
• File:05 I del P Entrepreneur.jpg
• File:Isabel del Puerto, writter.jpg
• File:05 I del P en El cuchitril.jpg
• File:04 I del P Model.jpg
• File:Isabel del Puerto.jpg
• File:02 I del P Isadora Duncan student.jpg

It says that the authors are unknown, so how could the authors send permission statements to OTRS? --Stefan2 (talk) 18:58, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

There were works for hire, so we have the permission from the copyright holder, but there is no trace of the name of the photographers in the ticket. --Ruthven (msg) 12:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 12:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

GLAM question

Hello. I'm handling an OTRS case for a particular Gallery. This is the summary:

• The gallery was created in memory of a deceased artist, by a relative.
• The relative wants to upload the paintings to Commons, and have an existing username.
• They have a gmail address, which is mentioned on the gallery website.

I'm going to instruct them to:

1. Upload the files to Commons
2. Send the OTRS email from that particular gmail address, to the permissions queue, quoting the file names.

Just want to confirm if I got the process right (since this is GLAM related)? Also, I don't have OTRS access, so will be pinging here for post-upload help :) Best regards, Rehman 14:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

@Rehman: It's fine. Just specify in the ticket that the Gallery inherited the copyright of the paintings via the relative. Then, when uploading, don't forget to add {{subst:OP}} in the file pages. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 10:49, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, Ruthven. Cheers, Rehman 23:28, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:58, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Images from the website Rodnovery.ru

About one month ago I uploaded the following series of images from the website www.rodnovery.ru, with the permission of the website which I forwarded to OTRS. The ticket is #2018042710011656. At the same time, I asked the website's administrator, a lady named Anastasia, to send a permission herself. She should have sent the permission around 15 May. Please tag the images with the ticket associated to her permission, or with both the tickets for completeness.--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 19:07, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

• File:Svetoary community celebrating Mokosh 2016.jpg
• File:USNBC Rodnover volkhv.jpg
• File:Temple of Svarozhich's Fire in Krasotinka, Kaluga, Russia (2).jpg
• File:Temple of Svarozhich's Fire in Krasotinka, Kaluga, Russia (1).jpg
• File:Temple of Svarozhich's Fire in Krasotinka, Kaluga, Russia (0).jpg
• File:Shrine at the Temple of Svarozhich's Fire in Krasotinka, Kaluga, Russia (4).jpg
• File:Shrine at the Temple of Svarozhich's Fire in Krasotinka, Kaluga, Russia (3).jpg
• File:Shrine at the Temple of Svarozhich's Fire in Krasotinka, Kaluga, Russia (2).jpg
• File:Shrine at the Temple of Svarozhich's Fire in Krasotinka, Kaluga, Russia (1).jpg
• File:Shrine at the Temple of Svarozhich's Fire in Krasotinka, Kaluga, Russia (0).jpg
• File:Russian Rodnover women.jpg
• File:Rodnover wedding in Russia.jpg
• File:Rodnover ritual in Russia.jpg
• File:Offerings at the Temple of Svarozhich's Fire in Krasotinka, Kaluga, Russia.jpg
• File:Initiation of a woman into the Native Faith (Rodnovery), near Moscow.jpg
• File:Perun Day 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (7).jpg
• File:Perun Day 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (6).jpg
• File:Perun Day 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (5).jpg
• File:Perun Day 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (4).jpg
• File:Perun Day 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (3).jpg
• File:Perun Day 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (2).jpg
• File:Perun Day 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (1).jpg
• File:Perun Day 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (0).jpg
• File:Shrine of the Temple of Svarozhich's Fire in Krasotinka, Kaluga on Kupala 2017.jpg
• File:Kupala 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (5).jpg
• File:Kupala 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (4).jpg
• File:Kupala 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (3).jpg
• File:Kupala 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (2).jpg
• File:Kupala 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (1).jpg
• File:Kupala 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (0).jpg
• File:Kupala 2015 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (5).jpg
• File:Kupala 2015 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (4).jpg
• File:Kupala 2015 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (3).jpg
• File:Kupala 2015 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (2).jpg
• File:Kupala 2015 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (1).jpg
• File:Kupala 2015 in Krasotinka, Kaluga (0).jpg
• File:Koliada 2017 near Naro-Fominsk (4).jpg
• File:Koliada 2017 near Naro-Fominsk (3).jpg
• File:Koliada 2017 near Naro-Fominsk (2).jpg
• File:Koliada 2017 near Naro-Fominsk (1).jpg
• File:Koliada 2016 in Naro-Fominsk.jpg
• File:Shrine of the Temple of Svarozhich's Fire in Krasotinka, Kaluga on Earth Day 2017.jpg
• File:Earth Day 2017 in Krasotinka, Kaluga.jpg

This section was archived on a request by: — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:12, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

keine OTRS-Genehmigung trotz Bildfreigabe

Hallo, gestern wurde das Bild: „File:GfK Kaufkraft Deutschland 2018.jpg“ gelöscht, da angeblich keine OTRS-Genehmigung vorliegt. Ich verstehe das nicht, denn am 01.03.2018 hat die Rechteinhaberin eine Bildfreigabe an die Adresse permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org gesendet. Eine Kopie dieser E-Mail liegt mir vor. Viele Grüße JoeHard (talk) 18:06, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

JoeHard, ich verstehe den Ärger. Aber die OTRS-Bearbeiter machen das ehrenamtlich und sind einfach zu wenige. Deshalb gibt es derzeit einen Bearbeitungsrückstand von mehr als 60 Tagen. --Túrelio (talk) 18:28, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, danke für die Info. Was passiert denn, wenn nun irgendwann die E-Mail vom OTRS-Team bearbeitet wird, und das Bild wurde aber schon gelöscht? Ich würde auch dort mitarbeiten, wenn noch Leute gebraucht werden. Wo muss ich mich dafür melden? Viele Grüße JoeHard (talk) 06:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

"Gelöscht" bedeutet auf Commons und Wikipedia eigentlich fast nichts, außer dass ein bestimmtes Bit gesetzt wird; d.h. die Datei liegt noch auf den Servern. Da die meisten OTRS-Bearbeiter auch Admins sind, können sie die Datei dann selbst wiederherstellen; andernfalls bitten sie einfach einen Admin darum; das ist eine Kleinigkeit. Die Prüfung der Genehmigung ist aufwendiger und erfordert Erfahrung. Falls du interessiert bist, dabei mitzumachen, könntest du dich z.B. an User:Krd wenden. --Túrelio (talk) 07:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Siehe: meta:OTRS --Krd 07:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Danke! JoeHard (talk) 07:37, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:19, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Photographer is old and unable to send an OTRS email

Hello team. I am in touch with a journalist (Karen) who is the daughter of the notorious underworld figure Terence Hogan (1931-1995). She wants to upload a bunch of old photos (1950s-1960s) of late Terence taken by her stepmom Roz (Terence's wife/secretary), which were given to Karen as a birthday gift. Roz has verbally agreed to Karen, and released the rights to Karen to use the photos on Wikipedia/Commons.

But Roz is in her late 80s and doesn't have an email to proceed with OTRS. Any advise on how to go about with this? I'm only referring to photos taken by Roz, not used anywhere else, with rights transferred to Karen. There are some which were used elsewhere, but that will be handled separately. Thanks in advance. Rehman 02:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@Rehman: I don't know if anyone will enjoy the bureaucracy, but Karen could print the mail template and ask Roz to sign it. (with a pen, nothing digital) Karen could scan/photograph that.

It's legally actually more reliable than email. - Alexis Jazz 02:53, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Great! She actually suggested that. Let me take that route then. Thanks for the swift response. Cheers, Rehman 03:13, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@Rehman: please note I am not an OTRS volunteer or have any special status. Just passing by. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 04:28, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@Rehman: the usual rule of thumb is that at a minimum we require the contact information for the copyright holder. If that is unavailable for Roz, perhaps the best would be to sign a transfer of copyright, rather than a release of rights... but the difference is marginal. Storkk (talk) 09:04, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes makes sense. I would probably suggest another sentence stating that, on the OTRS email template. Thank you, Storkk. Rehman 09:46, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:19, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Ticket:2009051410028286 - Request for existing approval checking

Could someone here be so nice to look at existing written permission under ticket:2009051410028286?. It was registered by OTRS member Polimerek at 21:02, 14 May 2009 and is visible at this plwiki page. Its in Polish: "Jest zgoda na użycie tekstów ze strony http://www.feta.pl/"; in English it mean "There is approval for using texts from page http://www.feta.pl/". My questions are:

• Is this permission (2009) still valid, and in what kind of ranges?
• Is this permission binding on that 1 mentioned article in plwiki and concerns texts imported from www.feta.pl only, or
• Is this permission valid also for other materials (pictures, video clips or so) from mentioned website and/or by disposal of the same, mentioned in permission copyright holder?

At the moment there is a problem with 3 files only, but I expect many more soon, so I must know if existing permission is enough, or should I inform the copyright holder about need of separate permission/s at every upload? Thanks in advice, --Jasc PL (talk) 15:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jasc PL: Sorry, the permission is only for text.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Many thanks @Jeff G.: for your so fast answer, you are great :). If I good understand, we have an unlimited approval for all texts from their website? So, what content should have their next approval - for unlimited multimedia? :) --Jasc PL (talk) 20:57, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

@Polimerek: Can you please ask for such permission in Polish?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:18, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Fortunately, Ankry is (was) here Jeff. --Jasc PL (talk) 21:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jasc PL: First, the permission is under GFDL license, so it is valid for text that is published in Wikimedia till May 2009. CC-BY-SA 3.0 is required for anything upoaded later and that cannot be relicensed.

Second, the rationale for copyright they provided is doubtful. It is not clear whether they have copyright to photos.

Third, asking for permission is not the role of an OTRS agent. Anybody who uploads a photo should ensure that they already have a permission for this. Actually, I am not even sure who the copyright holder is and I have no time to make deep investigation here. The photos may be used on their site even if they are not the real copyright holder under some kind of permission that does not allow anybody to publish them in Wikimedia. And before somebody asks for their permission they should ensure that they are the actual copyright holder. 05:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankry (talk • contribs)

(1). Their approval from 2009 - now this matter is fully clear and closed, as we have 2018 now.

(2). All speculations about what they have or not are unjustified now - until we see their present permission.

(3). In some various places, also at the recent discuss with you Ankry I clearly stated, that I'll be concerned with this matter to the end and will provide them any needful assistance. I don't expect that somebody will make anything instead of me, I only ask if:

• They must provide separate permission for some single or every set of uploaded files? or
• There are any possibility to make an "open" permission for 3 mentioned images and any next from this copyright holder?

That's all I must know and I do the rest, guiding them what should be done. --Jasc PL (talk) 14:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Great thanks for lack of answer one simple question I asked a week ago. I understand, that nobody - especially among Polish OTRS staff, is interested in receiving a quality photos released especially for us without -NC? --Jasc PL (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jasc PL: The simplest way to have their material, provided that they are in fact the copyright holder of ALL content available or hosted anywhere on their website (including all images, videos, text, and any sound files), you may ask them to add a notice on the website's home page stating something to the effect that "This website's content has been published under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 4.0 license" (or a less restrictive Creative Commons license, if for some reason they prefer, with a link to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.pl). You'll then be able to upload their content, adding {{Licensereview}} in the file pages. --Ruthven (msg) 07:37, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 21:57, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Фото Ірини Кондратенко та Михайла Литвиненка.

Добрий день! Кілька діб назад (орієнтовно 29 чи 30 березня) вислала дозвіл на файл Ірина Кондратенко на українских агентів ОТРС. Через кілька діб (точно не скажу, орієнтовно десь 2 квітня) вислав дозвіл на решту фото Михайло Литвиненко або хтось із його родичів, оскільки він дуже старенький (92 роки буде через пару днів) і навіть не має комп'ютера, не те що пошти. Фото Ірини - , решта фото належить Михайлу Семеновичу. Email Ірини починається на i-kondratenko на meta.ua. Велике прохання глянути на дозволи і відновити фото. Повний список фото тут - Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ірина Кондратенко. Дякую! --Nickispeaki (talk) 19:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

ПС. Висилали дозволи на українську адресу.--Nickispeaki (talk) 19:44, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 21:57, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Question about photos uploading permission

I was uploading photos for some Estonian movies. I do have the production company permission to use those posters and stills. But is it enough? The company is not the author of photos, but they order this material and they have bought all rights to use them wherever they want. So should i upload the company permission or those photos will be still deleted?

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkkultuur (talk • contribs) 19:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

@Kkkultuur: If they have bought the copyright, you should send copy of the contract along with the authorisation from the company to permissions-commonswikimedia.org. --Ruthven (msg) 10:25, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:40, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Larry Stimpert

RE: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dr._Larry_Stimpert.jpg

I am inquiring about email Dtd. 4/20/18 sent to OTRS including permission from Hamden-Sydney College for use of image. I have a copy if needed. Thanks. 2601:5C7:8302:4F70:F544:4C0D:8094:1BD1 19:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

@Hoppyh: We have your message in queue for Ticket:2018042010011169. It may take another 40 days.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 20:14, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 06:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Restoring File:Kamaliya_at_YUNA.jpg

Dear Sir/Madam,

Can you please restore the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kamaliya_at_YUNA.jpg to the wiki page? The Copyright holder's permission was sent to permissions.commons yesterday (14 June 2018, by Sergey Gritsenko/Сергей Гриценко).

Thank you. Articleinfo 12:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

 Done. Everything's done now, except for File:Mohammed Zahoor.jpg, please see your email. Trijnstel_talk 13:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Trijnstel_talk 13:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Restoring File:Kamaliya_with_Mohammad_Zahoor.jpg

Dear Sir/Madam,

Can you please restore the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kamaliya_with_Mohammad_Zahoor.jpg to the wiki page? The Copyright holder's permission was sent to permissions.commons yesterday (14 June 2018, by Sergey Gritsenko/Сергей Гриценко).

Thank you. Articleinfo 12:07, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

 Done. Everything's done now, except for File:Mohammed Zahoor.jpg, please see your email. Trijnstel_talk 13:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Trijnstel_talk 13:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Restoring File:Kamaliya's_Show.jpg

Dear Sir/Madam,

Can you please restore the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kamaliya's_Show.jpg to the wiki page? The Copyright holder's permission was sent to permissions.commons yesterday (14 June 2018, by Sergey Gritsenko/Сергей Гриценко).

Thank you. Articleinfo 12:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

 Done. Everything's done now, except for File:Mohammed Zahoor.jpg, please see your email. Trijnstel_talk 13:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Trijnstel_talk 13:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Restoring File:Kamaliya_at_the_Charity_Night.jpg

Dear Sir/Madam,

Can you please restore the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kamaliya_at_the_Charity_Night.jpg to the wiki page? The Copyright holder's permission was sent to permissions.commons yesterday (14 June 2018, by Sergey Gritsenko/Сергей Гриценко).

Thank you. Articleinfo 12:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

 Done. Everything's done now, except for File:Mohammed Zahoor.jpg, please see your email. Trijnstel_talk 13:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Trijnstel_talk 13:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Art-Hanoi.com

Images donated by Sema from Art-Hanoi are found under the category Media contributed by Art-Hanoi and have a valid OTRS ticket 🎟, however a lot of them are still in OTRS pending categories which sometimes happened because they haven't been checked and sometimes because the Subst:OP template was used at the same time as the OTRS ticket 🎟, see here for example which will still get them deleted. As I am not an OTRS member I can't do any of the maintenance necessary to keep them from being deleted here, but that would leave me tasked by having to clean up there deletions on the English Wikipedia and the Vietnamese Wikipedia where they are very much in use. I am not sure if someone here has the free time to add the appropriate ticket or to remove the "Subst:OP" template as these get deleted en masse and are never individually checked so even if they have a valid ticket will still be deleted. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:28, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: You do not need to write this in all the available talk pages! I've already removed the "OTRS pending" tag that were left in the files with the OTRS permission. --Ruthven (msg) 08:31, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Excuse me, I thought that if you were too busy that someone else could do it, excuse me I didn't mean to bother anyone. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Bruce R. Griffith (from Zeno.ru)

Mr. Bruce R. Griffith sent permission to allow me to upload his images to Wikimedia Commons to use on Wikipedia "and elsewhere", when this OTRS ticket 🎟 has been process I would like to request the volunteer one or two months from now to notify me of this fact on my talk page and tell me what template I should use. This ticket has no particular haste, I am working on a couple of large projects ans importing these images would disrupt them, but I plan on being done after 60-something days so don't hurry with it. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

ticket: 2018042810001325. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

I have not had contact with Mr. Bruce Griffith since, however in the indefinite future I will attempt to contact him once more and explain to him the licenses. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:17, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:17, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:LPR logo1.png

Help, please, get permission from the copyright holder. I am sure that the answer from the authors will be positive. Their e-mail: infolibertarian-party.ru Eg0rk0t323 (talk) 22:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

@Eg0rk0t323: It works the other way around: the copyright holder has to write us giving the permission to publish under free license. --Ruthven (msg) 13:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Проверьте, пожалуйста, поступило ли письмо. Eg0rk0t323 (talk) 02:19, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

@Dyolf77 and Ronhjones: I don't see an email message about this in OTRS. Is this the same image you deleted twice?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 02:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jcb: There have also been File:LPR logo.png and File:LPR logo2.png. Imaginative, this bunch.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 02:55, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes, both files are reuploads of File:LPR logo.png. Jcb (talk) 10:39, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jcb: Thank you for the reply and the deletion.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:07, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Agree - there's nothing showing in permission OTRS by searching the file name, the uploaders user names, or the e-mail above. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 15:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Didn't find any record on OTRS tickets, yet. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 17:23, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Nothing yet. Will close this request soon. --Ruthven (msg) 21:58, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:14, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

John Ferguson from Sportstune.com

John Ferguson who has a website that hosts a fairly large number of images of Chinese coins and charms has confirmed to me that he had sent permission to the OTRS team of Wikimedia Commons, he said that he didn't receive an automatic reply and that he didn't get a ticket number, can someone confirm that Mr. John Ferguson did indeed sent permission? (or at least that this e-mail was received by the servers? The e-mail address he may have used would've either have been "building@architectsoffice.co.uk" or "john@sportstune.com", I just wish to confirm that the ticket would've indeed been received by the OTRS.

If a special template will be created, could the maintenance category for all of his images be Category:Images contributed by John Ferguson (Sportstune.com)? Could someone then notify me on my talk page once the ticket has been processed? --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:22, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: Yes, we got a zip file from him on the 14th in the permissions-commons queue, creating Ticket:2018051410008727 and an autoreply; please ask him to check his spam folder.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:34, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Alright, I just wanted to confirm the fact that the e-mail actually made it through as I was afraid that he wouldn't have passed your spam-filters or something, is there something missing with the permission or is the way he sent it "good to go" (after the mandatory waiting time, of course) if he didn't give the permission correctly I will notify him. As I have to sleep now I won't be able to reply to this thread soon. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:41, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: A lot of images were provided, its going to take a while for a volunteer to look through the coins and the website to identify which coin is which (they weren't named in the file names). I've started a cursory glance but its going to take me at least a week to go through all of these. - Cameron¹¹⁵⁹⁸_(talk) 21:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

On second thought I have no idea how to even name these coins based on the information from the website :/ Maybe I'll let someone else identify and upload the coins. - Cameron¹¹⁵⁹⁸_(talk) 21:24, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

@Cameron11598: from what I can tell all the scans are John Ferguson's and illustrations like the ones found here aren't his. Note that at the bottom of this page he specifically states when images aren't his, as all the scans look similar I suspect that those are all his. Usually people credit others when they use their images so you could ask him just to be certain. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:29, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: That doesn't really help me come up with a naming scheme as there are multiple versions of the same "named" coin. Some of them have descriptions some don't so it makes it difficult for me to come up with a viable naming scheme for these images as I'm not an expert on Chinese Coins (I may be on the path to becoming a historian by my area of emphasis is Latin America US relations.) - Cameron¹¹⁵⁹⁸_(talk) 21:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

@Cameron11598: personally I go with the inscription + the name of the author + number if the mint mark or script type is unknown, see Category:Media contributed by East Asian Cash Coins, I prefer not to use an inscription alone as one coin could have many variants. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:49, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:RenateAnderl.jpg

Hallo, die Uploaderin hat die permission mail in die Bildbeschreibung kopiert, wenigstens schaut es so aus, das Bild wurde trotzdem mit Löschung gedroht. Könnt ihr bitte überprüfen, ob eine entsprechende Mail von der Urheberin im OTRS-Team aufgeschlagen ist und gegebenefalls die Mail aus der Bildbeschreibung löschen (lassen) - sie enthält private email Adressen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, the uploader has copied the permission mail in the image description, at least it looks like the picture was still threatened with deletion. Can you please check whether a corresponding mail from the author in the OTRS team is open and, if necessary, delete the mail from the image description - it contains private email addresses.
 

translator: Google via   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

 Done - @Herzi Pinki: Ticket:2018042310004457.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

City of Orlando OTRS Ticket and Template

Can someone add the OTRS template to my template {{PD-FLGov-Orlando}}? I first sent the ticket in on December 4, 2017 (ticket:2017120410010589), but forgot to ask about this when it was approved. --Elisfkc (talk) 03:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

@Elisfkc:  Done.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 09:11, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:13, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Fol-25B-26A-1743.jpg

Please, retrieve this picture, here is its's permission to be published.

Ticket:2017090110011591

--Владимир Нимчевић (talk) 19:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

@Владимир Нимчевић: The offered permission appears to be 46 pages of typed, printed, and scanned information on 100+ files. Please send hyperlinks, a file with them, or a link to them.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 19:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

@Dungodung: Any comment on this one? --Ruthven (msg) 10:30, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Restored. The text appears to be a license statement followed by filenames. This file is listed on page 9. Green Giant (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

A question on partial uploads

Quick question on the OTRS process. I've reached out to a copyright holder about submitting an image they have onto Commons, and they're somewhat reluctant about handing over the whole image. They are, however, fine with uploading a portion of the work. The image itself is a group photo, and I'm after a cropped part of it to use as a portrait for a historic figure on Wikipedia- this is the bit they're willing to crop and donate.

Is this acceptable to you guys, or does he have no choice but to upload the whole image? What's the process/consensus here? I'm new to all this and I'm not sure where else to ask. - ක - (talk) 04:52, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

@Jesuschristonacamel: That is fine, as long as the EXIF metadata survives the cropping. If it doesn't, they can email us the whole file with EXIF metadata, and we can apply that to the crop.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 05:25, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Cheers! I'll get him to submit an OTRS ticket soon.- ක - (talk) 05:46, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Quick follow-up: do I get him to mail you guys the image through OTRS, or will him uploading the image on Commons be ok? The entire image is on his personal website with a watermark. Additionally, how do you verify the uploader is who they say he is unless they submit an OTRS ticket? - ක - (talk) 16:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesuschristonacamel (talk • contribs)

@Jesuschristonacamel: It depends on what you and he sends, and public verification is rare.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 22:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Письмо, начинающееся со следующего текста, не приходило?

Настоящим я заявляю, что являюсь автором и/или единственным обладателем исключительных авторских прав на произведение http://libertarian-party.ru/materialy/atributika Eg0rk0t323 (talk) 07:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

A letter beginning with the next text did not come? I hereby declare that I am the author and / or sole owner of exclusive copyrights to the work http://libertarian-party.ru/materialy/atributika
 

translator: Google via   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:42, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

@Eg0rk0t323: Please send permission for your files from an official address via OTRS/ru.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:42, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 21:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Forwarded emails

Hi, How do we deal with a forwarded email, when a direct answer is not possible. There is a concrete case just now, which could make a difference for a lot of files: Commons:Deletion requests/Getty Images photos from the TechCrunch Flickr account (see at the bottom). Regards, Yann (talk) 15:49, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

• @Yann: You could try dnsadmingettyimages.com.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:58, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: that seems to make no sense? That's the address for the Domain Name System administrator. Not only do they nothing about the issue at hand, OTRS can't contact Getty directly and/or has considerably worse odds of getting a useful answer.

My proposal was that I create a new mail address, receive the mail on that address and give Yann the login details for that mail account. Yann can share it with other OTRS members, just be careful you don't get locked out if everyone tries to login at the same time. - Alexis Jazz 18:51, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz and Yann: If we have a forwarded email message, one way to verify it is genuine is to email the original sender. If we have to go through a dnsadmin, postmaster, or webform to do that because the target organization is purposefully opaque, I think we should try.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 02:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: small chance that'll happen..

If I give OTRS the login details for a mail account, you will be able to see the mail sitting in the inbox of the account, including headers. Afaik, that can't be faked. (no more or less than a mail direct to OTRS, which can't be faked either afaik) It's strange how we blindly believe any new user who uploads images as "own work" as long as Google can't find them, but here we must jump through incredible hoops because I can't be trusted, Yann can't be trusted, you can't be trusted, nobody can be trusted. Even though none of us lie or has any incentive to lie. - Alexis Jazz 04:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: Do you have a pair of URLs for the same photo on Getty and TechCrunch's Flickr I could ask about?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:39, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I could find such a pair, but Getty is infinitely more likely to respond to a question from a potential customer as opposed to Commons asking for freebies. So please, don't contact them. - Alexis Jazz 22:08, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I am not trying to reach Getty, Alexis does. And he is right that, in that case, we have to contact them through a form, so they will probably answer to the requester only. A special email account may be a solution, or may be someone has a better idea? I would trust Alexis in this case. He could also copy the full header to OTRS for additional proof. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:42, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 21:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Uploading images for the owner

If someone has given me permission to upload their photos and promotional event posters to the public domain for use in a wikipedia article, how do I go about doing that? Since I am not the owner of the image, I have to select - "This file is not my own work." and then provide a source, author, and why I "have the right to publish this work" which is either selecting a Creative Commons license that the copyright holder published the work with, or another reason with a valid copyright tag, and the date the work was created or first published. I don't have all this information, just the image and a statement from the owner: [we] own the copyright 100% of all the posters we create. Can I upload these on their behalf? Thank you!! --Beccalyn137 (talk) 21:14, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@Beccalyn137: Welcome. It sounds like {{CC0}} would fit your purposes if they truly want to release the works into the public domain. If, instead, they just want to use the works on English Wikipedia, please see en:WP:F.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:46, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@Beccalyn137: No. They must release their work under a free license. They will still own the copyright to the work, but they must allow anybody to use it for any purpose. Otherwise we cannot host them on Commons. Storkk (talk) 12:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 21:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

1 "MILLION " german stamp..

greetings... Can you please tell me if you still have this stamp in your museum? The reason Iam asking is bc I inherited this stamp from my great grandmother who started collecting when she was young.. Is this stamp is of value because it was printed during the War? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:1700:C3B1:A590:50D7:4CE2:E5FC:1DE8 (talk) 17:37, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

What museum are you trying to communicate with?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 21:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Tabunshikov.gif

This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. She added OTRS-permission herself. Is it valid or fraudulent? Please confirm or nominate for deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

@Taivo: The permission by @Lvova appears to be valid, but in retrospect it should have been added by an OTRS member. However, that was six years ago.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G. and Taivo: If the permission is valid, in those cases you should also delete the entry from the list at User:Krdbot/af69. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 07:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

The problem is that KrdBot log starts in April 2013, but the file was uploaded and the ticket number added in 2012, so it is missing in logs. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: It's not there for the reason cited by Taivo. I hope @Lvova is not still advising uploaders to add permission themselves.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:56, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

It was the standart reply (Response:Ru-Достижение результата) until creation the Response:Ru-Достижение результата (Викисклад), that is until 2013. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 13:55, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes, the same happened with Italian queues: before we used to ask customers to add the template themselves. Now all queues should be aligned on that, but it's a relatively recent change. --Ruthven (msg) 16:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

@Lvova and Ruthven: Thank you both.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 21:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Bruno Motta

I find this case slightly too complex to leave to FlickreviewR.

w:pt:Bruno Motta is a comedian from Brazil. (registered here as Special:Contributions/Brunomotta) File:Bruno Motta.jpg is his photo and he also has File:BrunoZé03pq.JPG. https://twitter.com/brunomotta is his Twitter account (verified by Twitter), also linked on his website.

There was no way to link https://www.flickr.com/photos/brunomottafotos/3710574781/ to him, he is in the OTRS process but I've been talking to him and I suggested he would link the Flickr account on his website/Twitter and change the license on Flickr. He linked the Flickr account on his Twitter and changed the license for both photos to CC0.

I will still let him go through OTRS, even if only because we generally require that for notable people editing Wikimedia projects. But I think File:BrunoZé03pq.JPG and File:Bruno Motta.jpg can also just be reviewed now since they have a compatible license on Flickr and the Flickr account can now be linked to him via his verified Twitter account. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 07:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Case appears to have been resolved. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 03:36, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 21:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Bilder Mommer

Wertes OTRS-Team,

sorry, dass ich mich jetzt erst melde, ich habe halt heute erst bemerkt, dass einige Bilder aus dem Artikel Willy Mommer von JuTa gelöscht wurden, da angeblich keine Freigabe vorhanden war. Ich als derjenige, der diese Bilder hochgeladen hat, bin diesbezüglich auch nicht informiert worden.

Fakt ist jedoch, dass ich vor längerer Zeit mich an die Ausarbeitung des Artikels de:Willy Mommer beteiligte. Über Benutzer:Dolores18, die mir bekannt ist, bin ich an einigen Bildern gekommen, die aus ihrem Archivbestand sind. Diese habe ich für sie am 6. Februar (!) hochgeladen und ihr zugleich die Freigabeerklärung geschickt, die sie wiederum ein Tag später ordnungsgemäß an das OTRS-Team weitergeleitet hat! Eine Kopie ihres Mails an das support-Team liegt mir vor.

Da bis zum 7. April auf diesen Bildern noch keine Freigabe vermerkt wurde, schrieb ich AKA an und dieser versicherte mir, dass er die Priorität von "Normal" auf "Höher" gesetzt hat. Trotzdem sind die Bilder offensichtlich nicht freigegeben worden, obwohl alles rechtens gelaufen ist!

Deshalb verstehe ich die Verzögerung beim OTRS-Team insgesamt und letztendlich auch die Löschung nicht und bitte Euch freundlichst um Klarstellung dieses Problems und Wiederherstellung der Bilder mit ordnungsgemäßer Freigabe.

Es handelt sich um diese Bilder: File:Männerquartett Eupen 1959.jpg, File:Männerquartett Eupen 1959 (2).jpg, File:Plattenhülle Männerquartett Eupen DNB 30.005.jpg, File:Willy Mommer, jun..jpg, File:Willy Mommer, jun. (2).jpg.

Beste Grüße, ArthurMcGill (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 22:39, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Liebe OTRS-Mitarbeiter,

Wie von ArthurMcGill angesprochen, bitte ich um Wiederherstellung der irrtümlich gelöschten Bilder (siehe oben). Die Abschrift meiner Freigabeerklärung vom 7. Februar 2018füge ich an. Herzlichen Dank für Ihre Bemühungen und freundliche Grüße Dolores18

Marie-Claire Mommer

ERKLÄRUNG: Ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder

{{{File:Männerquartett Eupen 1959.jpg}}}, {{{File:Männerquartett Eupen 1959 (2).jpg}}}, {{{File:Plattenhülle Männerquartett Eupen DNB 30.005.jpg}}}, {{{File:Willy Mommer, jun..jpg}}}, {{{File:Willy Mommer, jun. (2).jpg}}},

dass ich a) dessen Fotograf/in bin oder b) Inhaber/in des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts oder c) die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete.

Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode).

Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.

Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.

Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.

{{{7. Februar 2018}}}, {{{Marie-Claire Mommer}}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolores18 (talk • contribs) 13:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

@Krd: This is about Ticket:2018020710009647 in German.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:01, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Ticket has been answered. Discussion ongoing there. Ruthven (msg) 07:42, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:42, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Deleted Photo has since submitted permission letter

Hi, A photo that was placed on Commons in September 2017 and was taken down on November 6 2017 has since submitted an addtional permission letter which hopefully meets WikiCommons standardsand requirements. The File name is File:Portrait of Alfred Spector.jpg and you can find the deletion page here; It was deleted by editor Jcb. I am asking that the photo be reinstated onto Commons with an OTRS tag so that it can be added to the following Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Spector. Please let me know if there is any problem. Thank you. SteelersSuperBowl (talk) 11:06, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

@SteelersSuperBowl: Did the photographer from Ticket:2018043010006165 take this photo, too?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 00:53, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: The permission for the file can be found at ticket:2017100510007095. --Ruthven (msg) 08:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

@SteelersSuperBowl: We are still awaiting documentation of how copyright was transferred from the photographer.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:51, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:43, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Being granted permission to upload all media by a deceased author

I would like to know if it's possible to be granted permission to upload all media by a deceased author via the usual OTRS. As in, an email is sent to the OTRS team that grants the permission to upload the media of an author under a CC license. In this case Ayik Umar Said. Aumars (talk) 10:38, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Permission is granted by the CR holder (usually the photographer) instead of the one in the picture. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:42, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

If you mean photographs made by Ayik Umar Said being the photographer, we need a permission by email coming from his heirs. De728631 (talk) 21:02, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

I think he's asking about Ticket#2018052010004282. It claims to be "CR Holder" but is not clear about if it's CRH (by what means) or photographer. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 01:30, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Ticket has been answered. Ruthven (msg) 07:43, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:43, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Template:OTRS pending

This may not be exactly the right place to post this, but here goes anyway: Why doesn't Template:OTRS pending have a "ticket number" parameter – isn't that exactly the crucial bit of information we want from the submitter? Perhaps there's some other template that I haven't found that does this? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Uploader is not always the submitter, won't know if tickets have been merged, and in some queues does not receive an auto reply. And once a volunteer has seen the ticket, they should update to received anyway, which takes a ticket number. Storkk (talk) 12:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 19:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletion request needing OTRS member input

In Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tinytimes2.jpg the image in question appears to be a non-free movie poster, but apparently has OTRS confirmation. Could an OTRS member provide input as to whether the OTRS confirmation is valid? --Wcam (talk) 15:06, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

If I guess the related OTRS communications were made in Chinese, pinging @Taiwania Justo here who I know understands Chinese. --Wcam (talk) 15:11, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

@Wcam: This ticket is written by English and responsed by another OTRS agent. Ping @Natuur12. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 02:04, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

I concur with the judgement of @Natuur12. in this matter. Ticket:2015080710004815 is valid.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 10:12, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Guanaco (talk) 10:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Doubtful OTRS Permission Regarding File:Misa Mihajlo Kravcev potpisuje knjigu.jpg

A months ago, I tagged File:Misa Mihajlo Kravcev potpisuje knjigu.jpg for no source. Recently, when I examine the files I have dealt with, I found an OTRS permission template being added by a user who is not an OTRS agent (the user, I have search the user's name on Category:Commons OTRS volunteers). Can anyone help to investigate the issue and determine if the permission is valid?廣九直通車 (talk) 09:20, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

More information:The ticket regarding is Ticket:2018060610010621廣九直通車 (talk) 09:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

@廣九直通車: Actually, I am an OTRS agent and this permission is valid. --Miljan Simonović (talk) 10:28, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

@Miljan Simonović Sorry for the wrongful accusation, but why I cannot neither find your name on the list, nor find the Template:User OTRS on your user page? This made me doubtful and mistakenly thought that the permission is probably invalid.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:52, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

@廣九直通車: I don't know about the list, but I completely forgot to add the information to my user page. I added it now. :) --Miljan Simonović (talk) 11:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

The user is still on the list. @Miljan Simonović have you tried the OTRS gadget for insert? This gives us also a public edit summary what you have done. -- User: Perhelion 11:04, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

@Perhelion: No, I haven't. Can you explain me what is the OTRS gadget I how to use it? Thanks, Miljan Simonović (talk) 11:41, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

It is described on each template docu (for OTRS members) and on COM:OTRS (linked). If this was to hidden you can improve the docu. -- User: Perhelion 12:40, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

@廣九直通車: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:GlobalUsers?username=Miljan+Simonovi%C4%87&group=&limit=1

If someone who is not an OTRS-member adds OTRS permission you would have known it, it gets tagged "OTRS permission added by non-OTRS member", see Dr. Donna J Nelson for an example of this. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 09:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your reminder! And I apologize for the wrongful accusation here, sorry for the troublesome brought.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:01, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: -- User: Perhelion 15:21, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

droits auteurs contesté par JCB pour image : Claude de Romefort, autoportrait 1942 jpg et l'image supprimée sans vérification préalable.

L'image file:claude de Romefort autoportrait 1942 jpg a été supprimée par JCB depuis le 16 février sous prétexte qu'elle n'était pas sous licence. Un mail et même plusieurs ont été envoyés par les ayants droits pour deux images, celle mentionnée ci dessus et une autre intitulée claude de Romefort, jugement dernier novembre 1976 détail. Cette dernière ne pose pas de problème, l'autre par contre, celle supprimée, a fait l'objet de demandes complémentaires qui ont été produites par mail,en même temps que la seconde mais la mention n'a pas été mise à jour. Voila une semaine que j'ai renvoyé un mail resté sans réponse et que je n'ai aucune réponse pour savoir si ces mails envoyés pour autorisations par les ayants droits ont bien été reçus et conservés. Que faire pour rétablir cette image ? que faire pour que JCB ait accès à ces mails et rétablisse cette image? je vous remercie--Tpgrieg (talk) 09:57, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

• File:Claude de romefort autoportrait 1942.jpg

Bonjour, j'écris partout, je suis perdue! Je viens de trouver cette otrs notice board pour renouveler ma demande. Le 16 février dernier, JCB a supprimé cette image (cf sujet) sous prétexte que cela faisait 30jours qu'il fallait confirmer l’autorisation de licence. Cela avait été fait mais la mise à jour n'a pas suivie. Il y a eu un premier envoi de mails des ayants droits, puis à nouveau des nouveaux mails en complément ainsi que le rajout d'une nouvelle image nommée Claude de Romefort jugement dernier 1976 détail jpg. Celle ci n'a pas eu de problème tandis que la première a conservé sa mention otrs sans mise à jour. Pourquoi ? comment faire pour la rétablir? je passe mon temps à expliquer dans différents lieu du labyrinthe de wikimédia et wikipédia, pas de réponses, pourquoi? , merci de votre aide , je suis désespérée.--Tpgrieg (talk) 10:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

@Tpgrieg: Il ne faut pas se désespérer pour si peu! Avec l'e-mail il devrait y avoir un numéro de ticket. Si vous l'avez, on pourra contrôler. Normalement il faut plusieurs mois pour vérifier une authorisation et, une fois fait, le fichier est remis où il était. --Ruthven (msg) 12:09, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 19:26, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Gerry Rogers

Has OTRS received anything regarding File:Gerry Rogers.jpg? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MMMcMaster (talk • contribs) 20:23, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

@MMMcMaster: Not that I can find. Ask for a CC on the email message.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:24, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 19:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Un Vaincu

Hello. The file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Boissonnas,_Un_Vaincu,_English,_1875.djvu has now a red tag of deletion within 15 days. I would like to understand what went wrong with the process, because I have contacted and obtained authorization from the translator's son, Jean Boisssonnas (the author Lucie Boissonnas died at the end of the XIXth century). The translator's son sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org at my request, I was in CC, on Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:17 AM. The text of the email had been cut and paste from the tutorial on this web site. See also User_talk:Hektor in wikisource for background. Thanks for considering my question. Hektor (talk) 06:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

@Hektor: If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file description page will be adjusted when and if the email message regarding Ticket:2018031710003042 is processed and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the message is processed.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:12, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Thanks for your answer. The blue tag which has been added to the file says the information in the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for this file. Could you please clarify what exactly is missing ? Hektor (talk) 17:27, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

@Hektor: It was only time. I approved your ticket. Sorry for the delay.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 05:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Thanks a lot. Can you please approve also the three extracted images I made with croptool. Hektor (talk) 07:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

@Hektor:  Done, please ping or talk to me if you extract more.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 09:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 19:24, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Bert Lijnema (Zeno.ru)

Just to confirm has an e-mail been received from one Bert Lijnema (bertlijnema@hotmail.com) either in English or in Dutch? He told me that he already sent permission but didn't give a ticket 🎫 number, I just want to confirm that the e-mail did arrive. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: ticket:2018061410008912 has been recieved and is in the queue awaiting processing. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for confirming, I only wanted to confirm that it has been received, I have no particular requests other than the usual template-creation ones and a notification 🔔 on my talk page but I trust in the OTRS volunteers to be able to handle this so I will mark this section as  Resolved and prepare it for archiving. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Solicito restaurar

Solicito restaurar mis archivos..

estoy re subiendo porque poseo las licencias y derechos. me piden que explique y estoy describiendo y explicado origen y licencias. por favor restaurar.. soliciro restaurar porque creo que he dado las explicaciones y referencias que me han pedido con links y referencias

NO HABLO INGLES...

(Alek25 (talk) 22:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC))

estoy resubiendo porque he dado las explicaciones, fuentes y son fotos de mí autoría con permisos y licencias libre solicito restaurar

nohablo ingles y no es vandalismo 

(Alek25 (talk) 22:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC))

@Alek25: Hay que explicar por qué se han usado tantas camaras distintas. Evidentemente muchas fotos no son tujas. Si te han dado el permiso escrito, hay que comprobarlo y tienes que enviarlo a permissions-eswikimedia.org, con la licencia elegida y en nombre de los ficheros (puedes también indicar como referencia la página Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Alek25). --Ruthven (msg) 07:11, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 08:44, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Ticket:2018042710010326

Hello, Is it possible to check on the status of a ticket? It's [Ticket#2018042710010326] Thanks very much. Max Zimmet Mzimmet (talk) 03:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Mzimmet: Yes. It is 59 days old, so it has about 40 days to go before it reaches the head of our 99 day queue. It is also missing the URL of the file here on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:29, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G: Thank you Jeff. The photo was deleted because we didn't provide proper copyright notice. That was corrected via the email I referenced above. Thank you so much for any guidance on this. Mzimmet (talk) 03:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Mzimmet: Where was the photo here? Also, the dot is part of my username, I can't really get rid of it.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:50, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Sorry about the dot. I'm a newbie at all this. Thanks very much for your assistance. It was at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Hot_Pickin_57sMzimmet (talk) 03:59, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Mzimmet: That's not a file's URL. Is it in your upload log?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Yes, I found them there. Thank you so much. The two file URLs were File:Hot Pickin 57s Greetings from Austin Texas.jpg and File:Hot Pickin 57s South Congress Austin TX.jpg. Lisa re-sent them along with the permissions. BTW, she resent them with the original file image name from her camera. Mzimmet (talk) 04:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Mzimmet: Thank you. The A answer would have been https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hot_Pickin_57s_Greetings_from_Austin_Texas.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hot_Pickin_57s_South_Congress_Austin_TX.jpg . I have merged the subject ticket with older Ticket:2018042710010291 and added the URLs to the latter in a note.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:27, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: That is very kind and super helpful. Do you recommend at this point I should just give it the remaining 40 days or so? Will I be able to rename them with the file names I uploaded originally? Thanks again for all your help and guidance! Mzimmet (talk) 04:34, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Mzimmet: Yes, please wait. The original file names will be used, you can apply {{Rename}} as you see fit.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 05:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: OK, will so and thanks again so very much for all your help. 2600:1700:100:6DA0:DCED:AAA:C993:599F 12:40, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Mzimmet: You're welcome. Please sign in.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:52, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 08:44, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Ticket:2018062310004981

Can any OTRS volunteer confirm the image in this ticket (written in English)? Thank you, Dgw (talk) 08:15, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

@Dorian Gray Wild: OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email message is processed.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 08:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I asked the owner to send a new OTRS email instead of my email which I had sent, and he told me that he did so. Dgw (talk) 22:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 08:35, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Besoin urgent de validation d'images

Bonjour,

J'ai récemment mis en ligne des images pour lesquelles le photographe a envoyé des autorisations par mail. Il s'agit des photos présentes dans Category:2018 Cabourg Film Festival et Category:Fête du cinéma 2018. Les autorisations n'ont toujours pas été validées. J'en ai déjà parlé ici.

Maintenant je peux lire le message suivant : " Rien n'indique que l'autorisation d'utiliser ce fichier ait pu être vérifiée. Les champs auteur et source ont été renseignés mais il est indiqué que l'autorisation a été envoyée par courrier électronique. Cependant, elle n'est pas encore parvenue à l'équipe OTRS de Commons qui est chargée de vérifier sa validité. Veuillez nous envoyer la preuve que vous êtes autorisé à publier ce fichier à l'adresse permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Si nous n'avons rien reçu dans les 15 jours qui suivent l'apposition de ce bandeau (14 October 2018), ce fichier sera probablement effacé." (14 octobre ??? Est-ce un bug ?)

Y-a-t-il un problème ? Si c'est le cas, il faudrait me prévenir parce que je demanderai alors au photographe - avec qui je travaille depuis longtemps et qui a déjà donné plus de 5000 images à commons - de les renvoyer en urgence. En attendant, je me vois obligé de retirer la balise otrs pending pour éviter qu'elles soient supprimées automatiquement aujourd'hui, désolé... Merci d'avance. JJ Georges (talk) 09:17, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Par sécurité, j'ai fait suivre un message avec toutes les URL des photos au photographe, qui l'a renvoyé en me mettant en copie. Normalement, vous avez tout ce qu'il faut... JJ Georges (talk) 12:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

La date du 14 octobre 2018 n'est pas un bug. La date indiquée correspond au délai prévu pour qu'un courriel envoyé à l'équipe OTRS puisse être traitée par un membre de l'équipe OTRS. Ce délai est actuellement d'environ trois mois et demi, compte tenu du très grand nombre de demandes qui sont faites (dont un grand nombre de demandes inutiles qui surchargent sans raison OTRS) par rapport au très petit nombre de membres OTRS. Par exemple, si un bandeau «OTRS pending» a été placé sur la page de description d'un fichier vers le début du mois de juillet 2018, alors la date qui sera indiquée comme date de départ du calcul des quinze jours de grâce supplémentaires avant suppression sera trois mois et demi plus tard, donc vers le milieu du mois d'octobre 2018. Toutefois, cet avertissement de suppression ne devient visible sur la page du fichier que lorsque la période de trois mois et demi est écoulée. Vous avez cependant exceptionnellement vu cet avertissement avant ce temps pendant une brève période dans la journée du 12 juillet 2018, parce que le modèle «OTRS pending» avait été vandalisé ([8]), ce qui a été réparé peu après dans la même journée. Le bandeau est revenu à son affichage normal et l'avertissement de suppression n'y apparaîtra normalement qu'au mois d'octobre si le courriel n'a pas été traité à ce moment. Si un courriel a bien été expédié et est en attende de traitement par OTRS, il n'est pas opportun de retirer le bandeau «OTRS pending», puisque la présence de ce bandeau sert précisément à protéger le fichier contre la suppression jusque vers la fin du mois d'octobre 2018 (le délai de traitement OTRS de trois mois et demi après le placement du bandeau plus quinze jours supplémentaires). -- Asclepias (talk) 15:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Merci pour l'explication, je comprends mieux. Même si ce n'était pas un "bug", c'était bel et bien anormal puisque le bandeau avait été vandalisé. Sur le moment, j'ai cru qu'on avait attendu trop longtemps pour valider et que les photos allaient disparaître... Quoi qu'il en soit, je sais maintenant que le message nécessaire a été envoyé ! JJ Georges (talk) 15:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Si ça peut aider, j'ai remis la balise otrs pending aux images qui ne sont pas encore validées. JJ Georges (talk) 19:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 08:37, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Attributing Work

I am a creator of Adult Coloring books and have found many amazing images on your website. However, I am having an issue understanding the overall license which reads this.

This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. If you wish to use this content, you do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page. Wikimedia has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by an OTRS member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2016051310012174.

You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix – to adapt the work Under the following conditions: attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). share alike – If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.

What I wish to know while creating adult coloring book using images from your website that holds this sort of license. what is the proper way to give attribution to the author who is under creative commons? I would appreciate your help in giving me an example of the proper way in which to word this so that credit is properly given. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 184.103.190.159 (talk) 17:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

The shortest acceptable attribution would be "Peaksel CC BY-SA 4.0", and you would have to license with a CC BY-SA 4.0 or later license, unless you negotiate something better with Peaksel.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:28, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

autorisation

I would like to use a photo for a french movie for a channel tv.

it's free right ?

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.154.99.69 (talk) 16:56, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

The request is rather vague. Which photo (conditions depend on the license). --Ruthven (msg) 08:32, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Handled through OTRS. --AntonierCH ^(d) 11:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: AntonierCH ^(d) 11:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Lukion taulukot.pdf

Could somebody check if OTRS permit for File:Lukion taulukot.pdf looks ok? I suspect that processing of the OTRS permit will require somebody who will understand Finnish, but I would like to know if the permit looks like that it is technically ok and it will not require additional information. --Zache (talk) 12:52, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

@Zache: Without being able to read Finnish, the English text looks ok. I combined the tickets to Ticket:2018070210002493.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:28, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: thanks for checking. I checked that both Finnish speaking OTRS members are passive and notified fiwikis community that we need new OTRS volunteers. Do you know what will happen if there is no Finnish speaking OTRS members? Eg. if there are no new Finnish speaking OTRS volunteers and Makele-90/Para doesn't response in 30 days do we have any other alternatives than keep it pending and delete the file? --Zache (talk) 09:58, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

@Para, Makele-90, and AntonierCH: can you help?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Yes, on it. --AntonierCH ^(d) 13:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

I have some doubt about the sentence "Luovutuksensaajalla on tarkoitus saada lukiolaisten käyttöön vapaasti muokattava taulukkokirja, joka julkaistaan [FIWIKI]" that might restrict the transfer only for Wikipedia and would therefore be insufficient. I need to investigate a bit more, this might take some time. --AntonierCH ^(d) 13:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G. and Zache: All good, it's good. The sentence is only to explain the context and not a limitation. Permission is therefore valid. --AntonierCH ^(d) 09:59, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: AntonierCH ^(d) 09:59, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Uploads by Hiba Falah

Hi, This user has uploaded posters and added an OTRS permission. However it seems that the permission was not validated by an OTRS volunteer. Knowledge of Arabic would be useful. See e.g. File:بوستر ثار غليص.jpg, and User:Hiba Falah/MyTag. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:54, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: I have responded at Commons:Deletion requests/File:بوستر ثار غليص.jpg. --IagoQnsi (talk) 02:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Hiba Falah is the copyright holder. We had a meeting with the company Arab Telemedia Group last year, and they agreed to release some posters. Now, in order not to send a new email for each poster, it was agreed to let User:Hiba Falah handle the uploads. Any Company Poster not uploaded by User:Hiba Falah is actually a copyright violation. This was all in the ticket, in Arabic :) . I just updated the ticket. --Tarawneh (talk) 11:58, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

 Done I've undeleted the file and applied the template license tag (which has been protected). --Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Images from the WikiGap event in Kigali on March 8, 2018

Hello everyone, I recently uploaded some images from the WikiGap event in Kigali on March 8, 2018. While the pictures taken by Julia Sjöström have been marked as verified by an OTRS-member, the ones from Carl Fredrik Wettermark are marked as permission missing. I guess this is due to Mr. Wettermark sending the permission email not from an official domain, but from his private account. As I asked him to resend it using an official email address, I hereby request you to not delete the pictures and wait for that email. Thank you. --Zenith4237 (talk) 15:49, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

@Zenith4237: Even if they are deleted after a while (the processing queue is quite long), the files will be restored once the permission is verified. Thanks. --Ruthven (msg) 09:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

The Weeknd Photo

Hello,

Christine Yuan, the photographer/copyright holder of the updated photo of The Weeknd that was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons on July 18, 2018, sent permission to Wiki allowing use of her photo. The Ticket # to the permission is: Ticket:2018070310009663. Please let me know if anything further is required to use the photo on The Weeknd's page.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salandco (talk • contribs) 00:09, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

@Salandco: Just patience, about 95 days of it.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:58, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

permission image

Bonjour

concernant l'image File:THIERRY VENDOME EN 2018.jpg dont je suis l'auteur je souhaiterais avoir de l'aide afin de me permettre de comprendre ce qu'il vous manque pour valider la permission de diffuser cette image sur la page article de Thierry Vendome. Merci infiniment pour votre aide.

[Ticket#2018062710005409].

Republication [Ticket#2018062810007129]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siouville (talk • contribs) 19:43, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

@Siouville: Le courriel a été envoyé il y a 4 jours seuleument. Prière d'attendre au moins un mois et les informations nécessaires seraont envoyées en réponse, toujours par courriel. --Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 19:36, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

ticket #2007123110010109

Can you provide the proof behind ticket #2007123110010109 that says this photo is released under a CC license? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.2.243.114 (talk) 23:41, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Not legally, but you can ask the uploader of File:Bill Gothard 03.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:25, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

We recived a statement from a person who released it under a CC-license. The OTRS agent deemed the claim from 2007 to be credible. That's all the public information which can be provided without revealing private information. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 19:36, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Files I received by e-mail (Ticket#2018080410000275)

I created a concept template at User:Donald Trung/Scott Semans .zip files concept template to become Template:Scott Semans charms which were all sent to me in a .zip file by Scott Semans, I asked him to forward the .zip to the Wikimedia Commons OTRS team so I could upload the images here, he received an e-mail from an OTRS member requesting a URL, since I am going to upload these files here I request for the above template to be created and that later an OTRS member could confirm that all files that use that template are in fact the file contained within that .zip. This is because those files are simply no longer online as his "Chinese charms" shop returns a 404 message, but all content on his website (including texts and images) are releases as CC-BY-3.0 however since they haven't been online for many, many years I can't confirm this. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:04, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: I've moved the template. I used {{OTRS received}} in it instead of {{PermissionOTRS}}. I will switch it once I confirm all of the files you upload and tag with it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:29, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I will begin uploading soon. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:28, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Second (2nd) e-mail 📧: I received a second (2nd) .zip file 📁 from Mr. Scott Semans, I uploaded 15 (fifteen) new images from this second .zip file using the same template that we will forward replying to the original e-mail from User:Arthur (something, just voted for him in a sysop request, started with a "C"), I will also upload some crops from screenshots I made from these but I will mark them as crops and/or rotations (derivatives) and will attribute the original image. All new uploads are marked with a "B" e.g. "B01", "B02", "B03", Etc. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:36, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

105 images confirmed. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Email Sent to OTRS one week ago, but not verified yet [Ticket#2018073010002083] [Ticket#2018073010002092]

Hi , I'm editing an article for my company ( https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AE%D9%84%D9%88%D8%AF_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86 ).The person in this article is our CEO.This article was created by en ex-employee.Now Im trying to change the pic in the article.The same image is currently the Profile Pic of her on LinkedIn. This image is not published anywhere else online. I followed all the instructions specified by Mr. Paulo as in Ticket "[Ticket#2018073010002083] [Ticket#2018073010002092] release of خلود العميان.jpg " and managed to arrange an email sent to OTRS from the CEO's email itself to confirm it as adviced. It's been one week since it's been sent but It is still not approved. Wiki page still shows the old pic. So what shall I do now to get this image approved and to show up instead of the current one?

Regards, Ziyad Ziyadforbes (talk) 05:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ziyadforbes: OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email message is processed.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 05:55, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Jeff, I was contacted by an OTRS member named Arthur Crombez, and he verified the image. I've already added the image tag to the article. Now eagerly waiting for the amendment to be reviewed (https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AE%D9%84%D9%88%D8%AF_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86 ).

Please help me with amendment review. Ziyadforbes (talk) 11:52, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Problem solved. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:22, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Dear Arthur, Thanks for verifying the image. But its still not appearing in the article. Article still shows the old image and when I click edit,it reads "5 amendments to this version are pending for review . The stable version was checked on 18 November 2017" Can you please help me by reviewing the final amendment to finally make the new image show up on the article please?

Ziyadforbes (talk) 09:52, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ziyadforbes: I'm sorry but I'm unable to help you on this Wikipedia as I don't understand this language. Try to contact info-ar@wikimedia.org to get support. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:10, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Dear Arthur, I did not edit any content on the article. Only change I made was replacing the old pic with the new one. Pls confirm that change Ziyadforbes (talk) 12:13, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ziyadforbes: As I told you, I don't understand this language and it's complicated for me to use/visit this version of Wikipedia. Please contact info-ar@wikimedia.org to get support. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Dear Arthur, I Understand your point.Ive already emailed them and now will wait for a response.Thanks for your help.Ziyadforbes (talk) 05:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Italian speaker needed to confirm permission

Hi! File:Ovaldreams-original-pic.jpg mentions ticket:2016030210024784, but does not have a OTRS permissions templae. Ould an Italian speker see if the permission was recived and covers this file? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:18, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@Josve05a: Hi! An OTRS volunteer sent an email on May 2018 requesting a more specific permission statement without answer. So ticket is still pending waiting for an answer from the copyright holder. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Jallal Rapper 2017.jpg

This may be nothing, but could I ask for a check on the permission received and logged for this file (Ticket:2017040910001158), from Ursus Magana? It all appears to be in order ... except that the author of the image is, according to the EXIF data, not Ursus Magana but Alex Hallajian. Also, I note that the email address used by Magana is not associated with his website. Ping my esteemed colleague Arthur_Crbz in case he can shed light here. Some files from this uploader may need closer scrutiny. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

I will check Groetjes --Neozoon (talk) 18:19, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Justlettersandnumbers - it appears your esteemed colleague worked his magic, and the image has been cleared through permissions. I'd say it's safe to consider this case RESOLVED. Atsme 📞 00:53, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Er, no, esteemed colleague Atsme, it isn't resolved – Neozoon has sent an enquiry, but no reply (that I can see) has been received (thanks, Neozoon – I could and should have done that myself, I now realise). I don't know if he/she has also contacted Alex Hallajian, but there's a note saying he/she'd do that too. I'm concerned about this file because it appears that the uploader has been less than 100% transparent in some other uploads – see. e.g., Commons:Deletion requests/File:Diane Tuft 2017.jpg. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Hmmm...I did not see the most recent correspondence when I first checked the ticket - but I see it now. Apologies. Atsme 📞 13:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Rightly or wrongly, I've now gone ahead and nominated this for deletion, as there's apparently been no response to the follow-up enquiry by Neozoon. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:53, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

• File deleted. --Ruthven (msg) 15:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Anantashakti

This file was originally uploaded in 2007, so maybe the way Commons verifies licensing over the years has changed since then. The file is licensed as {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} and it is "Copyrighted to Himalayan Academy Publications, Kapaa, Kauai, Hawaii. Licensed for Wikipedia under Creative Commons and requires attribution when reproduced." There is a link on the file's page which says permission can be found at en:User:Himalayan Academy Publications. "User:Himalayan Academy Publications" also contains a link to en:User:Satyanatha/Permission email,which looks like a permission email which was/could be sent to OTRS, but there's nothing there suggesting OTRS has verified the original copyright ownership license, etc. Moreover, the permission emails seem to user specific (i.e., permission granted to a particular user only) which is something Commons generally doesn't accept. There are quite a number of files uploaded by Special:Contributions/Anantashakti~commonswiki and all seem to be under the same license. Anantashakti~commonswiki hasn't edited since 2008 and User:Himalayan Academy Publications hasn't edited since December 2011, so I have no idea how to find out more about this from them. Is all this sufficient for Commons verification purposes, or do these files require fruther OTRS verification? -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Copied from COM:VP.

I don't see the issue if https://secure.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=738277 actually shows these permission mails. Well, I see one issue: the license needs to be changed to GFDL, but we can do that. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

"permission granted to a particular user only" permission is granted to a specific user to upload, so they leave the decision of what to upload and what will be licensed to that user. "All material uploaded by User:Anantashakti copyrighted by Himalayan Academy will automatically be licensed to Wikipedia under GFDL." is clear: the content is licensed to Wikipedia under GFDL. Wikipedia shares it with the world using the same license, and the GFDL allows Wikipedia to do that. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Correct. Atsme 📞 19:52, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Painting by a dead artist

Hello, I am asking this question for User:Kawika1000. So he wants to upload an image: https://www.keouanui.org/elizabeth-kekaaniau. This portrait is commissioned based on a historic 1850s photograph. The artist Mary Koski and the person who commissioned it is a family member of the deceased subject. The painting is now displayed at the Kawaiahao Church in Honolulu. The artist is now dead and the work was done in the 1980s. I don’t know anything about the commissioner but guess they don’t hold the copyright. My question is how can the user get the copyright permission to upload this image. Can he get permission from the artist’s descendants and get an OTRS tag verifying that? Will that work? Uploading as a fair use image is not an option since there are many other free images of Elizabeth Kekaaniau.—-KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

This will probably depend on whether it was a "Work for hire". Not all commissions are technically Works for Hire, and it would require there to have been a written contract specifying that it was a Work for Hire. If that is the case, then the copyright would lie with the person who commissioned it, and we would need confirmation from them. If it was not a Work for Hire, then the copyright would lie with the (heirs of) the artist, unless the artist then sold the copyright. But absent any indication that the copyright was sold, and given the artist is deceased, then yes, permission from an heir of the artist (assuming that heir inherited the copyrights, and they weren't bequeathed elsewhere) would be required and sufficient. Storkk (talk) 18:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Just a note about the images at Kawaiahao Church in Honolulu. They are only giclée copies. The originals are actually at Liliuokalani Church. Gertrude Miller/Toledo passed away in 2006 but contacting this Miller family (no relationship) might provide some clarification if she has an archive or left documents etc..--Mark Miller (talk) 22:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Also, the artist daughter is likely the heir to her mother's works and copyright (as it appears from some sources but from indirect evidence) and is easily contacted as she is a working artist herself. I do not have her name however.--Mark Miller (talk) 22:54, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for everyone's help....I was able to contact the artist Koski's heir who is Mrs. Long, she emailed me granting permission to use on Wikipedia as long as her mother is indicated as the artist. I also was granted permission from the commissioners' children (my cousins) who are her heirs. I will try and re-post using proper certification and tag Kawika1000 (talk) 12:30, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Kawika. Here is the instruction on how to upload a work that is not yours once you have gotten the permission from the copyright holder of the work. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS#If_you_are_NOT_the_copyright_holder —-KAVEBEAR (talk) 15:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Note that "permission to use on Wikipedia" is not sufficient, and we need an actual license. See COM:Licensing for more information. Storkk (talk) 15:44, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

I’m not too familiar with this since I’ve never uploaded a copyrighted image myself and the page you link is all jargon to me. Can you please explain which license should be used in this particular case? It is a copyrighted work that the copyright holders are giving permission to use.—KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:52, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

"Permission to use" is simply not sufficient to upload here. The copyright holders need explicitly declare a license that we permit. All licenses that we permit allow anybody to modify and reuse (even commercially) the works uploaded here, as long as various requirements such as attribution are followed. If you could make it more obvious exactly which parts of COM:Licensing you feel are inadequately expressed or "jargon", we can try to help you understand, but Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses seems to use jargon sparingly, and I'm not sure how much clearer it can be made. Storkk (talk) 07:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

OTRS permission only possible one image at a time?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fire_Law_Stone&diff=848104727&oldid=848062816

I said: Sending OTRS permission for every image would be rather bothersome and also not necessary. OTRS only needs to verify the planeimages.net account belongs to the same person as the User:Fire Law Stone account.

FlightTime responded: "bothersome". Then I suggest stop uploading.

I would swear OTRS could be used to give permission for more than one image at once or just to verify some other account belongs to a wiki user so they won't be accused of COM:NETCOPYVIO when they upload their own images. Was I wrong this whole time? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

They can be grouped together. But we need to know exactly what images are being released. They have to be specifically mentioned. And it is only "intimidating" because enwiki doesn't have a mass file handling script. So each one is done individually which results in numerous, repetitive, notices. I've been asking for VFC on enwiki for years now to no avail. As for FlightTime's response, they only said that because you said it was "bothersome" to begin with. --Majora (talk) 22:54, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Would "tedious" have been better? And is it not possible to release all images from a specific social media account, website, etc? I strongly suspect there are tickets that do not mention each and every filename. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 03:38, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Of course they can. But if they were to send something in that said, "all images from website x are under this license", we are likely just to tell them to post a note on the website. And yes, there are tickets that don't mention a file name. They are a massive pain to handle and oftentimes we have to ask what image they are talking about anyways leading to delays in processing. There is even a default response that basically says "we don't know what you are talking about. Please tell us." --Majora (talk) 03:44, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

In many similar cases, we have created Custom OTRS permission templates to use on every file covered by a broad permission statement. Guanaco (talk) 03:54, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Fair point. Either or will work. I guess it would depend on if it was a continuing release and there were lots and lots of photos that would be uploaded over a period of time. Up to the agent on how they want to handle it I guess. --Majora (talk) 03:58, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

In this particular case, it would be "all images from the Ashabul planeimages.net account that I upload here with the 'Fire Law Stone' wiki acount".

Having to send permission every time he uploads a plane image (which seems to be half a dozen every once in a while) would be tedious. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 08:03, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Er...Alexis Jazz that website allows you to mark photos as Creative Commons. Says so right here. Just have them change the licenses on their photos from "All Rights Reserved" to an acceptable license. No OTRS needed. They will probably require {{LicenseReview}} at that point but that is leaps and bounds quicker and simpler than going through OTRS. --Majora (talk) 19:36, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

In any case, what is important is that can be unambiguously identified 1) the images and 2) the license. So any statement including both would do. E.g. "I, XX, allow all my photos of the Museo del Prado uploaded by user YY to be published under CC by 4.0 license" is perfect. Not tiresome at all. Sending a single email for every upload is pointless and confusing for OTRS agents. --Ruthven (msg) 07:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:16, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Update permission of File:Pedro-Costa-Neves-2018-by-Jana-Rot.jpg

Hi I would like to ask for an update on the subject File:Pedro-Costa-Neves-2018-by-Jana-Rot.jpg.

The photo was taken by Ms. Rot and she told me she already sent an email with her authorization to use it.

ticket:2018072610007809

Persocon (talk) 12:30, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

@Persocon: OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email message is processed.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:32, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Thanks for the quick reply. Sad, it means that the file will be deleted even before the check of email. How could I proceed next time uploading? on the uploader wizard there's no way to prove that I own the credits of the images or it is creative commons. --Persocon (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

• OTRS permission added --Ruthven (msg) 15:15, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:15, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

My mother's photos

Question: my mother has given me the right to publish any of her photos that I see fit to upload to Wikipedia. I just received notice that some of these photos need OTRS verification - is there a quick way for her to authorize me to publish her photos? Maybe an OTRS template? That way I wouldn't have to go through the time wasting OTRS process for every upload. Thanks, mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 00:57, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

@Mr.choppers: Yes, we can make a template for her work. Once you have an approved ticket for her work, you can mention this to the approving agent.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 17:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Changing license templates

Hello. A while ago i uploaded a number of audio files with an OTRS for permission. However it has been pointed out the the license templates applied to these items is {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} when it should probably read {{cc-by-sa-3.0|Sain (Recordiau) Cyf.}} since SAIN are the copyright holders. Could someone confirm that it is ok to change the licences? or will this invalidate the permission given in the OTRS doc? Thanks in advance Jason.nlw (talk) 15:43, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

It is ok. You should also make sure that the source is not {{Own}}. You could use one of these tags: Category:Multilingual_tags:_Source like {{Author source}}. --AntonierCH ^(d) 11:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Great. Thank you for your help. Jason.nlw (talk) 12:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 17:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

2010021110051311

ticket:2010021110051311 Permission for all photos from the site bscyb.ch ? --ManFromNord (talk) 11:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

@ManFromNord: Per Google Translate, no license was specified, so under today's conditions no file bearing this ticket number would survive.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:24, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

No, a permission covers the following file under CC-BY-SA-3.0 (permission is in the email of the OTRS agent) :

• de:File:YB-St.Gallen18709 168.jpg ==transferred from dewiki to==> File:Vladimir Petkovic 2009.jpg
• de:File:YB-Xamax61209 112.jpg ==transferred from dewiki to ==> File:Scott_Sutter_2009.jpg
• File:truempler-jeandupeux.jpg
• File:mandziara.jpg

--AntonierCH ^(d) 11:33, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

@AntonierCH: Which article was that license approved in? Which OTRS member approved on-wiki? Perhaps I missed it.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:00, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Article 4 seems to contain the explicit agreement to the license terms. Although I usually prefer seeing it written by the customer, in this case they explicitly agree to the license. I believe we accept that routinely. OTRS agent involved was Guandalug, who was an OTRS member and administrator. Storkk (talk) 12:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Hey Jeff G.! ticket:2010021110051311, license CC-BY-SA-3.0-DE in 4th article (#Article5086790), approved in 5th article. In the 3rd article the OTRS agent is asking questions and the requestor is responding inline in the 4th article, see question 3 answered by "Ja". 4th article basically says :"I have added the permission template, check if it's alright". I hope it is clear, feel free to ask more information or a translation (i can leave a ticket note in English that sums it up id needed). --AntonierCH ^(d) 12:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

• What is the result? Permission for only these four photos? --ManFromNord (talk) 08:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

@ManFromNord: Yes, permission for only these four photos. You may use https://www.bscyb.ch/kontakt to request further permission be sent using that ticket.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 17:54, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Kalina Czyste Szumienie.jpeg

While the file was uploaded locally on plwiki, one of the OTRS operators was not sure when asked if everything is OK. Nevertheless, someone moved this file to Commons. Someone should check this ticket now. ~Cybularny ^Speak? 11:24, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

@Cybularny: It seems clear to me via Google Translate: File:Kalina Czyste Szumienie.jpeg AKA pl:Plik:KALINA.jpeg is cc-by-sa-3.0 with author Bartosz Maciejewski per Ticket:2018042510007638. I have marked the former file as such, although I am unsure about the aspect ratio.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:48, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

@Ankry: Your thoughts?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I had expressed some doubts in the tickets and asked another agent for an opinion. AFAIR, I did not receive any before I have left OTRS and I do not remember what my doubts were about. Maybe, concerning authorship of the photo. I think, you should ask another Polish-speaking OTRS agent for explanation. Ankry (talk) 13:34, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

@Ankry: Sorry, MediaWiki:Gadget-markAdmins.js must be out of sync with https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?user=Ankry&title=Special%3AGlobalUserRights because I see Commons showing your username on this page with "(A/P)", rather than just "(A)". @Perhelion: thoughts on this behavior of markAdmins?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

It seems the bot has stopped working on the updating task, but I will try to find someone to restart it. --Didym (talk) 14:28, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

This could be more challenging, as the bot has not stopping running. Maintainer are Dschwen and Krinkle. -- User: Perhelion 16:14, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

One of the CommonsMaintenanceBot tasks got stuck (reason unknown). I have restarted it, and it has resolved the issue (diff). --Krinkle 23:17, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Oh* thank you, I noticed it Special:Diff/311720977/311829233. It seems the JSLinter (outdated) checks also old revisions. -- User: Perhelion 00:12, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

@Didym, Perhelion, and Krinkle: Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 00:26, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 17:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Permission Correspondence Osho Birthday 1972

Hello!

I was wondering if I could see the permission correspondence for File:Osho 1972 Birthday seek-index 268 0.26.ogv, ticket #2011053110000331.

I'm a journalist doing a story about Osho and would like to use the video, but need to see the permission correspondence for our archival clearance.

Thank you!

- Jessica jessica.fordvice.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessica.ford08 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jessica.ford08: The OTRS system is confidential, so we will not be able to share this with you. Your best bet would be to contact either Jayendra Lashkari or Abhijit Nimbalkar (as per the video's description text), but we can't help you do that either. Storkk (talk) 10:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 17:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Wie ist denn derzeit die Bearbeitungsdauer für die permission-de-queue? [Ticket#2018071510002076]

Für Englisch ja über 100 Tage, aber das ist vielleicht eine fehlerhaft berechnete Prognose? Und die hübschen Grafiken vom Backlog zeigen doch nur die Zahl der offenen Tickets, nicht die voraussichtliche Wartezeit? --C.Suthorn (talk) 12:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

What is currently the processing time for the permission-de-queue? Ticket:2018071510002076 For English yes over 100 days, but that is perhaps a wrongly calculated forecast? And the pretty graphics from the backlog show only the number of open tickets, not the expected waiting time?
 

translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

@C.Suthorn: 167 Tage. 167 days.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 17:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Deleted pics from my fiancee

I noticed today the following files had been erased:

Files of Alberto Julbe

Alberto Julbe (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

   File:Aljibe del castillo de Villel.JPG
   File:Atalaya del castillo de Tramacastiel.jpg
   File:Castell de Vallada.JPG
   File:Libros (Teruel).JPG
   File:Plataforma del castillo de Libros.JPG
   File:Torre del castillo de Villel.JPG
   File:Tramacastiel.jpg
   File:Villel (Teruel).JPG

And all because the author was listed as "My fiancee" (who happens to be my wife right now). I posted them with my account because she doesn't have one, and according to Spanish law, anything we own is shared. Some of those pics ( File:Libros (Teruel).JPG

   File:Plataforma del castillo de Libros.JPG    File:Castell de Vallada.JPG) were extremely difficult to obtain, and it is quite possible that backups have been destroyed. Was it really necessary to erase them because there wasn't a written permission from someone called "my fiancee"? Does she need to create an account with that username? 

If I ever get to publish anything on wikipedia I will get sure not to give credit to the one clicking the button of my camera in order to avoid this, but it's most possible I never ever do it again. Thanks for kicking out two contributors in one click. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberto Julbe (talk • contribs) 11:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

• @Alberto Julbe: I filed COM:UDR#Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Alberto Julbe for you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:59, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G. and Jeff G. ツ: Thanks! My programming skills are so limited I couldn't find the way to do it myself. In fact, I'm not sure I'm pinging you right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberto Julbe (talk • contribs) 17:00, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

@Alberto Julbe: You're welcome. The first two sections were right, but pings don't work unless you sign with four tildes in the same edit.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:53, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 17:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G. and Jeff G. ツ: Unfortunately it seems the request has been ignored. Well, I guess I should be investing my time into something else then. Thanks anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberto Julbe (talk • contribs) 00:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

German speaker needed to confirm permission

Hi! File:Helmut-Balzert.jpg mentions ticket:2006050810011088 , but does not have a OTRS permissions template. Could a German speker check if the permission was recived and covers this file? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 09:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jonatan,

Nowadays, we would not have found this release as sufficient. The sender isn't clear on owning the copyrights to the image, nor under which license he wants to release it - it's "downloadable for free use".

I can read and speak German, but not really write. I would like to ask a German OTRS volunteer for a second opinion and maybe try a follow up on the ticket, even though it's twelve years old. Ciell (talk) 21:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

After reviewing the ticket I have to agree with Ciell that the ticket neither mentions a license nor that the sender is in fact the copyright holder. Cheers --Millbart (talk) 15:38, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

+1 This is one of the very old permission tickets (2006) we have, that where not handled properly from todays point of view.

Since there is a better and younger picture of Helmut-Balzert, the old image ist not in use anymore (beside some user pages). A request to the depicted person will propably lead to a complicated discussion with unshure outcome, I would recommend to delete it. // Martin K. (talk) 08:44, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Summary of the ticket: An OTRS member asked the depicted person for a photograph where they have the copyright (6 December 2005). This photo was sent in response (13 February 2006). In response, the OTRS member asked for a higher resolution of the photo (18 March 2006). The depicted person replied on the same day and refered to a photo at http://www.w3l.de/ which can be freely used, original quote is: Das Foto kann frei verwendet werden. The photo was then uploaded on the same day. Martin K. is right in pointing out that this is a very early ticket where the requirements were not as well established. We have following options: We could grandfather it or delete it as we cannot be sure about the copyright status and its free release. I recommend the latter as we have a more recent and much better photo and as the older photo is no longer used in the main space of any project. Like Martin K., I would advise against re-opening this ticket. --AFBorchert (talk) 10:18, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Deleted per agents above. Ciell (talk) 17:59, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 17:59, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Email Sent to OTRS several days ago, but not verified yet (Ticket#2018072510007418)

Hi! I uploaded on Wikimedia Commons some screenshots of the video game "Prince of Persia" (1989) a few days ago (available here : Category:Prince of Persia). The copyright holder, Jordan Mechner, gave his permission to publish the content under a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. Two emails were sent to the OTRS team by Jordan Mechner. A first one on July the 25th (generating Ticket#2018072510007418, answered by an OTRS member on July the 31st) and a second one on August the 6th (containing the links to the content). This permission has not been validated yet by an OTRS member. Can anyone check this? Thank you very much  ! --ΛΦΠ (talk) 22:57, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

@ΛΦΠ: OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email message is processed.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 08:39, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 17:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:جاسم السلطان.jpg

May I please have the assistance of a combination OTRS Member and Administrator in closing Commons:Deletion requests/File:جاسم السلطان.jpg? The uploader refuses to even identify the photographer, much less provide evidence of a license.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 08:41, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

I see you've just send a follow-up. Let's wait a few days, see if he responds? Ciell (talk) 19:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ciell: Fair enough, waiting for a response at the DR or Ticket:2018070710002117.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ciell: Jcb closed it as delete and we have a reply.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 05:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for trying Jeff G., too bad for the uploader it didn't work out the way he wanted it to. Ciell (talk) 16:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 17:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Copyright

Ticket:2018071610001271

This is the number of ticks sent by the owner of the copyright for all articles on the subject Miloš Ćorlomanović. I hope I'm in a good position. Thank you.Crnizmaj (talk) 05:27, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

@Crnizmaj: I can't find any ticket with that number. Please double-check that you have the correct ticket number. Guanaco (talk) 05:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

@Guanaco: Not possible! It's certainly a proy that he got from a bot. He sent me directly your mail that came from your bot. Two ticket numbers arrived because two messages were sent, the other through this OTRS system.Crnizmaj (talk) 05:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Ticket:2018071610001271 Ticket:2018071610002403

Sometimes the ticket-number links don't work (due to spaces and what-not in the links), but I can see both tickets linked above. Awaiting review. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 06:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

I fixed the ticket numbers. Considering the actual backlog, it might take a couple of months more. --Ruthven (msg) 15:18, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 15:18, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Jose de cauwer-1531688297.jpg

This looks like a screenshot from television, or even a photograph of a program on a television set, not a real photograph. Therefore, I would like to challenge the OTRS permission. Tekstman (talk) 16:58, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

I agree: it does look like a screenshot. There was no talk about the source of the picture, the author just says "yes, it's my own work". @Ellywa: : you processed and uploaded the picture: what was your opinion at the time? Ciell (talk) 08:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

at the time I considered this was an original photo. Ciell please ask the uploader for more details. I cannot access OTRS at the moment. Elly (talk) 14:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

I've send a follow-up. Ciell (talk) 19:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

@Tekstman: Well spotted: indeed it was a screenshot from a television broadcast by nl:Sporza. The permission was not valid and therefore I deleted the image. Thank you for your help and your keen eye. Ciell (talk) 15:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 15:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Ticket:2018062310004981

Good night OTRS volunteers, on 16 July 2018 at 22:10, I wrote here that I asked the copyright owner to send a new OTRS email to permissions-commons. The owner did send it directly to permissions-commons on 11 July, 2018 at 10:12 a.m. IDT (Israel Daylight Time). Then I was sorry to find out that File:נכה לא חצי בן אדם - לוגו.jpg was deleted on 13 August 2018 at 19:35.
Please follow ticket 2018061010004218 (former ticket), and find the email which the owner sent from his official NGO email, and signed it himself. Please undelete File:נכה לא חצי בן אדם - לוגו.jpg, and undo the deletion which was made in the Hebrew Wikipedia, because the copyright owner did want to see his logo there, as he wrote it to me yesterday. Dgw (talk) 09:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ijon: Could you assist with this Hebrew ticket? Ciell (talk) 14:06, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Yes, the old ticket does (now) contain an e-mail from Mr. Fridman, the rights owner of the file, with a proper release. The file can be undeleted. (I am not a Commons admin.) 23:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, I restored the image and added the OTRS ticket. Ciell (talk) 15:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 15:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Not authorized?

@Krd: while editing File:Michael Ajakwe.png it showed me that I am not a OTRS member. Is that any bug? --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 04:10, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

@Tiven2240: GlobalUsers and Special:CentralAuth/Tiven2240 say you still are a member, and this edit by Ruthven was similarly wrongly tagged.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:07, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I think there is some change/renaming of this group. Some links can be found on meta stewards noticeboard --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 16:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

@Tiven2240 and Ruthven: I see, m:SN#Rename OTRS-members group.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

• It should be fixed now, thanks to User:Perhelion [9] 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

:This section was archived on a request by: 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Ticket no. 2018081610003302

Was wondering if an OTRS volunteer could check the ticket(s) for File:Michael and Martin Hofele.jpg, File:HOFELE-Design factory in Donzdorf.png, File:Bruno Hofele.png and File:Carl Hofele.png. The files were uploaded and {{OTRS permission}} tags added with the same edit by the same editor who has only just created his/her account, only has four edits to his/her credit and who is not an OTRS volunteer. Perhaps this is not uncommon, but I've never come across it before. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:05, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, the ticket is not processed yet. I removed the {{OTRS permission}} from the files and added {{subst:OP}} instead. The ticket is ambiguous and does not even mention the files, so I did not use {{OTRS received}}. By the way, an abuse filter tracks pemissions added by non-OTRS volunteers. But recently, the group name changed from OTRS-member to otrs-member (all lowercase), and I guess that is why the filter is broken and these edits were not tagged. I will take care of this problem. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:55, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

This was a regex issue and was reported at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Abuse Filter 69: Template:OTRS permission is not detected. Thanks for spotting these! 4nn1l2 (talk) 05:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for checking on these 4nn1l2. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:51, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Файл:Косенко Віталій Анатолійович.jpg

Помогите пожалуйста с этим файлом https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Косенко_Віталій_Анатолійович.jpg, мне разрешили им пользоваться, но я так понимаю письмо от автора так и не пришло, а прошло уже пару лет, как мне сохранить его? Отсюда https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPJOF3fhe28 видео общедоступное. DENAMAX (talk) 00:29, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Письмо от автора пришло, но автор не ответил на встречный вопрос, не подтвердил, что он является автором, поэтому разрешение не было выдано. Автору было предложено, на выбор:

• Разместить свой почтовый адрес, хотя бы временно, на своём сайте или в открытом профайле любой соцсети, прислав нам ссылку.
• Прислать разрешение с другого адреса, который будет явно связан с автором.
• Прислать (фото)копию любого документа.
• Временно изменить лицензию для видео со Standard YouTube License на Creative Commons на период проверки.

Это всё можно сделать до сих пор, и тогда файл может быть восстановлен. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 14:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 09:39, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

cover illustration of San Fransisco Oracle

Hello!

Who are the right holders of San Fransisco Oracle cover illustrations? Who do I need to ask for permission/license to publish those? Wikimedia claims to have received an e-mail from the copyright holders. Who are they? How can I contact them? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.243.141.66 (talk) 08:54, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Where do you see this claim?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:03, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 08:07, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Alida Buckle

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alida Buckle.jpg

People who can actually see the ticket should discuss it. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 05:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

I answered there (and in the ticket). --Ruthven (msg) 08:13, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 08:13, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Chiara Ferragni at the 2018 Cannes Film Festival.jpg

Givlia.ah claims that a licensing permission e-mail for this photo has been sent in. But given that no license is specified on the file description page, that the uploader found the photo on Google, that they think the photographer's name is "Glamour" (not sure if that's supposed to be their first or last name, but the real author's name is Pascal Le Segretain), and that Getty Images aren't in the habit of publishing their content under free licenses, it looks a lot like the uploader is simply abusing {{OTRS pending}} to delay the inevitable deletion. Has anything actually been sent in? —LX (talk, contribs) 09:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

No, I could not find anything related to this file or person. 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 11:08, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: —LX (talk, contribs) 11:08, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Woodcuts of Petter Lorens Hoffbro

I recently added the following picture to Wikimedia Commons, and was just informed of that the description of the copyright situation I gave did not suffice to substantiate that the picture is in the public domain. The picture can (as of yet) be found at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Petter_Lorens_Hoffbro_woodcut_Johannes_Magnus.tif

The picture was taken on the request of a Jonas Nordin for use in his works. The woodcut in itself is obviously no longer protected by any copyright, and as far as the photograph in particular is concerned, Jonas Nordin informed me when he sent me the picture, it does not come with any copyright attached to it, and that I was free to distribute it as I wished. What do you require that I provide to make you satisfied that everything is acceptable in as far as having the picture on Wikimedia Commons is concerned? -- Makemakean —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

@Makemakean: You had better use a standard license template such as {{PD-old-100}} rather than writing in words about the copyright status. Furthermore, please note that in Nordic countries faithful 2D reproductions of old paintings usually result in a new copyright to the photographer (Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs#Nordic countries). Nevertheless, Commons:2D copying states that such photographs can be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:26, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

AJP426

AJP426 does not appear to be an authorised OTRS volunteer, but is removing problem tags and marking their own uploads File:Benguet Auto Line Baguio Station.jpg and File:San Fernando railway station.jpg as having verified permission. Could an actual OTRS volunteer please look into this? —LX (talk, contribs) 05:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

@LX: Thank you for your report. I have undone those actions, warned the user, and filed a DR.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 17:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

permission for newspaper article

I believe to have followed the guidelines in the upload and permission process for this newspaper article. I need help as I don’t understand why the template of the upload states “message was not sufficient”. The template has been added by user: Arthur Crbz https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Arthur_Crbz

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Article_in_Daily_Sakal_about_Justice_Chandrachud_unvailing_the_portrait_of_Ramdas_Paranjpe_by_Artist_Mumbiram,_28_June,_1992.jpg

The Editor of Daily Sakal is the author and copyright holder of the original article as well as the author of the uploaded image (derivative work) The Editor of Daily Sakal has sent the letter of permission to OTRS. Ticket#2018080710007683

Please let me know why this template is being shown and the licensing information is seen as not valid. Thank you for your help. --Kusum Bhagavat (talk) 16:14, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

@Kusum Bhagavat: This concerns File:Article in Daily Sakal about Justice Chandrachud unvailing the portrait of Ramdas Paranjpe by Artist Mumbiram, 28 June, 1992.jpg. We need permission directly from: Daily Sakal for the text; the photographer for the photograph; and artist Artist Mumbiram and the other one or two artists for the three portraits. Such permission should be sent with the following in the subject bar of the email: [Ticket#: 2018080710007683].   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:57, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 11:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Can a OTRS volunteer member check Ticket:2018081610009084 for File:Master Of Ceremony album artwork.jpg

I need help with adding my permission for File:Master Of Ceremony album artwork.jpg using Ticket#: 2018081610009084 that was e-mail to me. Can somebody pelase check out Ticket#: 2018081610009084 and see if it is a legit ticket, (File:Master Of Ceremony album artwork.jpg) this media file is missing evidence of permission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MounTiCool (talk • contribs) 12:02, 2 September 2018‎ (UTC)

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. @MounTiCool: I tagged the file {{subst:OR}} for you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

• @MounTiCool: the ticket seems fine. It will be processed in due time. --Ruthven (msg) 11:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 11:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

[Ticket#: 2018082310002041]

Hello! I requested undeletion for several files I uploaded to Wikimedia I sent the OTRS permissions on august 23 for all files and still haven’t seen the files being restored.

[Ticket#: 2018082310008839] [Ticket#: 2018082310002111] [Ticket#: 2018082310002102] [Ticket#: 2018082310002095] [Ticket#: 2018082310002086] [Ticket#: 2018082310002059] [Ticket#: 2018082310002041]

Moises Pellerano --Mpellerano (talk) 07:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

• @Mpellerano: Please wait until an agent will be able to check the ticket. --Ruthven (msg) 11:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 11:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Robin Tewes

Category:Robin Tewes

"As requested, the artist Robin Tewes has verified that the Flickr account is hers and has indicated her permission for each of the images in an email to OTRS using the template at Commons:Email templates"

Can someone see if that email can be found? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 01:08, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz and Mianvar1: Ticket:2018051010000581 is in queue.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:26, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! I had added OTRS pending, but obviously didn't know any ticket number or if any mail even arrived. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 01:32, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: You're welcome!   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:41, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

ticket:2018082510003901

Hi, Do you think this permission (in French) is sufficient? i.e. File:Photo portrait de Clément Berlié au Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps en 2017.jpg. It is not the standard CC license, but I think the text is equivalent to a free license. However, the permission comes from the subject, the photographer's name is not given, and it is not specified how the subject acquired the copyright. What kind of document should we eventually ask? Regards, Yann (talk) 08:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: Without the name of the photographer or means of transfer of copyright, no it is not sufficient. Others reading this board may wish to review COM:ANB#Rédacteur31.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 00:50, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I agree, and I requested more information. My question is about what kind of document(s) we need to assert copyright ownership. It is quite probable that we won't get a copy of the contract, as it may contain confidential information. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:29, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: Acknowledgement that it exists would help.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 10:01, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

@Yann and Jeff G.: This is non-public information, and should be discussed on OTRS wiki. Please, if you have doubts about a ticket in the future, refer to that wiki. Thanks :This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Clarification on licencing (BC highway sheilds)

I noticed that the File:British Columbia Yellowhead Highway 16.png on Wikimedia Commons has an OTRS licence, even though it's similar to the non-free w:File:British Columbia Highway 5.svg and w:File:British Columbia Highway 16.svg. If I'm interpreting the licence correctly, could I substitute a '5' for the existing '16' and create a similar file and save it under the same licence? Does that mean I could use it on {{Template:Jct}} (replacing the use of File:BC-5.svg)? --MuzikMachine (talk) 16:32, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

@MuzikMachine: Yes, I believe so, but please tag them {{subst:OP}} and let me know when I may add the OTRS permission.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:11, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Thank you! I converted to .svg and uploaded the files as follows:

• File:BC-5 (Yellowhead).svg and File:BC-16 (Yellowhead).svg can replace the non-free w:File:British Columbia Highway 5.svg and w:File:British Columbia Highway 16.svg respectively.
• File:BC Yellowhead blank.svg and File:Yellowhead Blank.svg and replace the use of File:YellowheadShield.jpg in articles.

Trusting that is okay. -- MuzikMachine (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

@MuzikMachine: Yes, I added the permissions.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:12, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:26, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Need help with: Permission for upload of paintings given by Artist himself

I request the OTRS volunteers to check if the correct licensing information have been given in the following uploads to Wikimedia Commons and if the template PermissionOTRS|id=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX can be applied.

The uploads are images of paintings by Artist Mumbiram, who has also published the paintings on his website www.mumbiram.com

Emails for OTRS have been sent and received ticket numbers, which are given here. The email has been sent from the copyright holder (Artist Mumbiram) from his email address: mumbiram@yahoo.de, which is also the email associated with the website, www.mumbiram.com, where the file has been initially published.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E2%80%9CRed_haired_amateur_palmist_girl_reading_Krishna%E2%80%99s_fortune_near_Govardhan%E2%80%9D,_by_Mumbiram,_Gouache_Watercolor,_Seattle_1976.jpg Ticket#: 2018071110007168

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E2%80%9CVrindadevi_reveals_the_secrets_of_Bhakti%E2%80%9D,_by_Mumbiram,_Watercolor,_1990,_Pune.jpg Ticket#: 2018071110006623

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drupada_is_coming_out_of_the_river_with_Mumbiram,_Watercolor,_by_Mumbiram,_1990.jpg [Ticket#: 2018071110007122

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E2%80%9EGokula_dreaming_of_India%E2%80%9C_by_Mumbiram,_Oil_on_canvas,_1988,_Japan.jpg Ticket#: 2018071110007033

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E2%80%9CKusum_brings_her_Mother_Sakhrabai_to_visit_the_Artist%E2%80%9D,_by_Mumbiram,_Charcoal,_1984,_Pune.jpg [Ticket#: 2018071110007024

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E2%80%9DNot_by_bread_alone_-_Kusum_making_chapattis%E2%80%9D,_by_Mumbiram,_Charcoal,_Pune_1990.jpg Ticket#: 2018071110006963

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E2%80%9CMarathi_Poets_1982%E2%80%9D,_by_Mumbiram,_Watercolor,_1982.jpg [Ticket#: 2018071110006918

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E2%80%9DChitalyanchi_Soon%E2%80%9D_(Daughter-in-law_of_the_Chitale_Family_),_by_Mumbiram,_Watercolor,_1982,.jpg Ticket#: 2018071110006874

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lakhu,_1985,_Gouache_Watercolour_by_Mumbiram.jpg Ticket#: 2018071110006847

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E2%80%9CRadha_Svadheenbhartrika_(Radha_has_Krishna_to_herself_in_a_favourable_mood)%E2%80%9D_by_Mumbiram,_Watercolor,_1995,_Pune.jpg Ticket#: 2018071110006641

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E2%80%9CAlice_Cooper_washing_Mumbiram%E2%80%99s_Hair%E2%80%9D,_by_Mumbiram,_Ink-and-brush,_Seattle_1975.jpg Ticket#2018071110007186

I am worried that the uploads get deleted as it has happened to another file, which I uploaded with the same permission. That the file has been deleted can be seen here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Advocate_Ramdas_Paranjpe,_Oil_Painting_by_Mumbiram,_Pune,_1990_s.jpg It had the Ticket#2018072410007741.

I thank you for your help. If there are any licensing issues about these uploads, please let me know. --Kusum Bhagavat (talk) 15:47, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Did you tag the files {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:57, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

• Yes, the OP have been added. Ruthven (msg) 07:21, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

• @Kusum Bhagavat: Now please refer to Ticket# 2018071110006641 only, because the different requests have been merged. In 3 months approx the request will be processed and the files eventually undeleted. Cheers Ruthven (msg) 07:21, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:21, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Soubor:Show_Ivan_with_the_drawing_by_Pavel_Rampir_of_the_Alsterufer_attack.jpg

Hi,

id like to ask about waiting for approval of photo on page: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Otto_Schwarz File: Show_Ivan_with_the_drawing_by_Pavel_Rampir_of_the_Alsterufer_attack.jpg.

Thansk to answear.

VW — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.135.99.99 (talk) 13:05, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

@Viki80: The only ticket I can find which mentions "Alsterufer" is Ticket:2018041210013299, but that is resolved and doesn't mention the filename above. Do you have a ticket number? Looking further re File:Ivan Otto Schwarz.jpg (which may be the same photo), we have been waiting since 19 January for permission from artist Pavel Rampir in Ticket:2018011610010147. While we wait, would a bust or headshot crop of the latter file suffice? That would be a vast improvement over File:Ivan Otto Schwarz.png.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Email has not been delivered from artist Mr. Rampir yet? Is It possible to load this photo again? Thx to answear VW. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viki80 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 7 June 2018‎ (UTC)

• Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Viki80: I replied to the ticket.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 06:48, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Doktor Pronin

Hi, Doktor Pronin (talk · contribs) added several OTRS permission to posters, but they doesn't seem to be a member of the OTRS team. Can someone speaking Russian verify please? Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:15, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @Rubin16.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

In my opinion there should not be {{OTRS ticket}} as far as the permission is published on the site. It was a GNU GPL permission in the conversation for all the site, and in my opinion there is a small problem in the fact that Doktor Pronin writes that he's the only author, but in fact he's only the right's owner. Anyway, with the permissionon the site it's not a problem of OTRS. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 14:19, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 06:48, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Pragya jaiswal at IIFA Utsavam.jpg

Please review the permission and fix the OTRS tag for File:Pragya jaiswal at IIFA Utsavam.jpg --Sreejith K (talk) 20:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

@Sreejithk2000: I find no mention of that file or source file in Ticket:2017032910012057.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Sreejith K: Same by my side, as I mentionned while removing the template and to the uploader. I would advise to speedy delete since the uploader as put the permission a third time on the file (without template this time). --AntonierCH ^(d) 10:56, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

We have a lot of files in Commons with this ticket. What all files does this OTRS email cover? I can create a build DR if required. --Sreejith K (talk) 18:50, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

I also looked at this ticket, (came from w:en:WP:OTRSN, didn't see this until today). Definitely not listed there. I'll also note that there appears to be a discussion about this on User talk:Perumalism --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:58, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 06:47, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Permission of Schilderwerk Beutha pictures of 8 May 2018

Hi, the permission of the Schilderwerk Beutha pictures in Category:OTRS pending as of 8 May 2018 was sent to permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org on 22nd of May 2018 at 08:41:33 MESZ. Could you check whether the email was delivered. If the email was delivered please review the linked files. Thank you. --MAyo (talk) 08:32, 25 September 2018 (UTC).

@MAyo: Ticket:2018052210003332 is currently 126 days old. Unfortunately, it is in the permissions-de queue, which currently has a backlog of 240 days.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: What about the deletion templates and categories? Can they be removed while the pictures are in the de-queue? --MAyo (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

@MAyo: I tagged the half dozen files with {{subst:OR}} for you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 06:56, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Incomplete verification

Can someone please complete verification of these files:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kristina_(Superhero_Landing).png http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LIFEFORM_by_Visual_Organization.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vasily_Levanov.png

Adrew Knowl (talk) 08:33, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

 Not done @Adrew Knowl: The ticket has been sent at the beginning of the month. Please wait ~60 days more for a first answer, because we have a huge backlog (if the files are deleted meanwhile, an OTRS agent will take care of restoring them, if the permission is accepted). Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 06:44, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 06:45, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Document familial

"Document familial" is French for "family document". Considering this bit of information, does File:Les jumelles de Monoblet.jpg need a permission statement? 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

@4nn1l2: I think so.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:47, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:10, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Daniel_Fellner.jpg

Hi!

Why did the file File:Daniel Fellner.jpg get deleted? I sent all the required information on April 26th, 2018 and received the ticket number ticket:2018042610017241. However, I never received any other response.

--Florian Fuchs (talk) 06:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

@Florian Fuchs: That ticket is currently 144 days old. Unfortunately, it is in the permissions-de queue, which currently has a backlog of 233 days.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Wouldn't it have made more sense to keep the file then instead of deleting it? I even added the ticket number to the file description. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 14:56, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

@Florian Fuchs: Yes, that would have made more sense. Pinging @Jcb, deleting Admin. @Krd: We could also benefit from backlog tracking for the permissions-de queue, since it is currently longer than the permissions-commons queue.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

I have responded to the ticket in English to speed up the process. I do read German, but writing it will take a lot of time. Please be aware that permission has to come from the author rather than the depicted person. Jcb (talk) 15:41, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

ticket:2018072010008908

I would like the ticket:2018072010008908 to be reviewed please. This regards to questionable authorship of some of the images that are uploaded, which was addressed via email two months ago. I'll provide details if necessary. --George Ho (talk) 09:02, 19 September 2018 (UTC); edited, 09:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, George Ho I’ve located the ticket and will take care of it. Atsme 📞 12:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Remettre une image suite transmission droits

Bonjour,

Une photo a été supprimée de la page Choeur d'Enfants Sotto Voce, alors que l'auteur vous a transmis dans les délais son accord pour utilisation. Avez-vous bien pris en compte cet accord, comment remettre la photo ?

> From: Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> > Date: August 21, 2018 at 23:23:38 EDT > To: Mark Primmer <redacted> > Subject: [Ticket#2018082210000928] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Image release)

Merci pour votre réponse. --Vaddai (talk) 06:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)--Vaddai (talk) 06:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Deliver an image following rights transmission

Hello, A photo has been removed from the Sotto Voce Children's Choir page, while the author has sent you his agreement for use on time. Have you taken into account this agreement, how to put the photo? Thank you for your reply. > From: Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> > Date: August 21, 2018 at 23:23:38 EDT > To: Mark Primmer <redacted> > Subject: [Ticket#2018082210000928] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Image release)

 

translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:11, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

This probably concerns File:Chœur d'Enfants Sotto Voce.jpg. It appears OTRS/fr does not stress the use of {{subst:OP}} strongly enough.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:18, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

• @Vaddai: J'ai récupéré l'image, le temps qu'un volontaire contrôle l'autorisation envoyée. Ruthven (msg) 16:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

ticket response

Can someone check if all emails are successfully received by Commons AND content of these emails with license and other text are correctly submitted by the Author. Thank You Vasily Levanov (talk) 10:58, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank You Vasily Levanov (talk) 10:58, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Vasily Levanov: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:56, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:08, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Photo verification issues

Can someone take a look at these files:

• File:Kristina_(Superhero_Landing).png
• File:LIFEFORM_by_Visual_Organization.png
• File:Vasily_Levanov.png

They have been uploaded a couple of weeks ago, and an email with permission has been sent.

My co-worker uploaded some files to Commons earlier this month, and it usually takes several hours for them to be verified.

In my case, it’s been more than two weeks, and I wonder if something wrong with these files or my request. Can someone take a look and tell me how to get these files to be verified, thanks, Alex. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexey Fargotov (talk • contribs) 13:31, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

• Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

• @Alexey Fargotov: Please refer to ticket:2018090310005985 for further interactions. Meanwhile, the emails have been sent around 1 month ago. It's too early to expect an answer, which generally takes more time. --Ruthven (msg) 11:12, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 11:11, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Likely fraudulent permission provided to OTRS

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Patrick_Rogel&diff=303316812&oldid=303033528

@Ganímedes: File:Mallu actress.jpg may appear to be available on http://reshmamalluactress.blogspot.com/2018/05/datemay12005-this-work-is-free-of-known.html with CC0 ("License to use Creative Commons Zero - CC0. You are free to use for many purposes without worrying issues licenses because this picture is TRUE FREE.", it's just dripping with sarcasm), but the date on the site ("SUNDAY, MAY 1, 2005") seems to have been faked (as the URL says 2018/05), the blog has no other posts, the author is claimed to be "Mike Dichen" (but what does a G+ profile prove?) and the photo as shown there is cropped, Tineye finds the uncropped photo in various places, none of which seem to be the actual source. It looks like a magazine scan to me (because of the colors) but I can't prove that.

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-hZlmQyR5DgM/WwhQEw6pipI/AAAAAAAAAlI/K-x-3GwtUngIsMDpR4vPPWihjSIs21HhwCLcBGAs/s1600/IMG_20180525_233235.JPG should also raise some eyebrows. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:01, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I didn't proceed yet, and now I'm waiting for you comments. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 19:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 09:20, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

example File:Bernd Ruf Portrait.jpg

Moin everybody
It's summertime, holidays in Germany, because I would not clear images delete when we are already talking to the customers. Generally I would like to say that the admin does not press the delete button so fast, if the OTRS team is on it. It just means more work because I have to ask an admin every time.
Es ist Sommerzeit, Ferien in Deutschland, da würde ich nicht unbeding Bilder löschen wenn wir schon mit den Kunden im Gespräch sind. Generell würde ich mir wünschen das die Admin nicht so schnell den Löschknopf drücken, wenn das OTRS Team dran ist. Es bedeutet nur mehr arbeit, denn ich muss jedes mal einen Admin fragen Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 13:44, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi!

On a big project like Commons, admins don't always know what images are handled by OTRS agents and at the moment we have a backlog until April. But to make clear that you uploaded a picture to Commons about which you'd like to converse with an OTRS Agents, please use {{subst:OP}}, so Admins know about the situation. Ciell (talk) 09:36, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Can a OTRS volunteer member check Ticket:2018091510005355 for File:D-Ploy Records.jpg

I need help with adding my permission for File:D-Ploy Records.jpg using Ticket#: 2018091510005355 that was e-mail to me. Can somebody pelase check out Ticket#: 2018091510005355 and see if it is a legit ticket, (File:D-Ploy Records.jpg) this media file is missing evidence of permission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BelPolitik (talk • contribs) 20:08, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 20:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Ok, But I've been tagged with media file is missing evidence of permission. Can you help with the correct tag? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BelPolitik (talk • contribs) 20:45, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

• Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Ok, but I suspect a connection to en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prince-au-Léogâne/Archive.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

An answer has been sent. --Ruthven (msg) 16:20, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:20, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Помогите с номером пожалуйста

Мне пришёл номер Ticket#2018100410008745 для файла https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Игорь_Ефимович_Рогалёв.jpg с уважением, --Капитан Объективность (talk) 18:38, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Help with the number please I got the number Ticket: 2018100410008745 for the file File:Игорь Ефимович Рогалёв.jpg with respect,
 

translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:55, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

@Капитан Объективность: Есть проблема? Is there a problem?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:55, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

@Капитан Объективность: Answer has been sent on 04/10/2018. Please reply to that e-mail. --Ruthven (msg) 16:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

ticket:2018052510001311

This ticket (ticket:2018052510001311) contains emails sent five months ago. George Ho (talk) 21:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

The current backlog of the (English) permissions-commons queue is 152 days, as you can see at the top of this page. The ticket you mentioned has been created 143 days ago. That being said, I replied to the ticket, because I put some time into reading it, so it was inefficient to just leave it... 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:44, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Yosef Szydlowski

Dear all,

I am looking for some confirmation that the photograph with ticket number 2014052810015611 is free to use commercially in a television programme. Whilst I know that the image has been donated by the Kvutzat Kinneret Archive for use, I would like some kind of confirmation that they have given permission for the image to be used.

Thanks,

Hannah — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.107.74.75 (talk • contribs) 09:20, 9 October 2018‎ (UTC)

There's a file attachted to the email, which my computer cannot read. Can someone else give it a try? (Ticket is in Hebrew) @Hanay: Ciell (talk) 15:14, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ciell: The file attached to Article 1 of Ticket:2014052810015611 appears to be a jpg scan of a paper authorization, in Hebrew, but I can't understand the Hebrew. I can convert to png (or xcf or anything else the GIMP can dish out) and email it to you if you like.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:11, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

I don't speak Hebrew either, but agent @Ijon: does. Could you have a look, Ijon? Ciell (talk) 18:10, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ciell: Yes, I can confirm the paper authorization in that ticket is a blanket authorization of all the uploads by the Kinneret Archive as released under the CC-by-sa 3.0 license. (I am a native Hebrew speaker.) Ijon (talk) 23:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ijon: Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 23:33, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! Ciell (talk) 07:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:33, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 08:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Zvezdelina Stankova.jpg

I noticed that "cc-by-sa-2.5" is used. Should the license be rather GFDL, like the other one here: File:Tsit Yuen Lam.jpg? George Ho (talk) 00:21, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I fixed it. Thanks 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Kaffee in Cutete.jpg, File:Leuchtturm von Oecusse.jpg and File:Sitz des Administrators in Oecusse.jpg

Is the string "Ticket#2014061110003331" on these three file description pages created by J. Patrick Fischer in 2014 a reference to a valid OTRS ticket? The file descriptions don't have any actual OTRS tags on them, which I'd expect them to have if the ticket was reviewed and approved. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:34, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

@LX: The ticket was reviewed in 2014 and does not contain a valid permission statement. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:42, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

I loaded up several photos of Mr. Cruz on this date. The others have got a valid permission. I do not know, why there is another ticket number on this three files, maybe because two emails were send by Mr Cruz for permission and the older one doesn't have a license mention, so maybe there were two tickets open. The correct ticket number is 2014061110017719. Can you fix it? (Please mention my name or leave me a message, if there are further questions). --JPF (talk) 06:59, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

I've merged the two tickets to ticket:2014061110003331 since they are about the same set of images. Nine images listed here were included in the ticket. File:Leuchtturm von Oecusse.jpg is not there, and I cannot verify the uploader at the listed source since the Facebook group is closed. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:44, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

The direct link to the Leuchtturm-photo on FB would be here. --JPF (talk) 10:59, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

JPF: "Sorry, this content isn't available right now" – probably because it's in a closed group. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

So, what to do? There is no rule, sources have to be available for public. --JPF (talk) 15:48, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The purpose of providing source information is to enable checking that the copyright information is correct. And for OTRS volunteers to confirm a permission, the permission obviously needs to identify the content in question. Perhaps it would be possible to give an OTRS volunteer access to the image, or to change the privacy settings of the image? In any case, it sounds like additional correspondence will be needed. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@LX: Yes.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:35, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Isn't it possible anymore to request simpley entrance to the group? Anyone should have a FB account. The group is not belonging to a secret organization. :P --JPF (talk) 09:29, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

All I see (while logged in) is "Sorry, this content isn't available right now. The link you followed may have expired, or the page may only be visible to an audience you're not in. Go back to the previous page · Go to News Feed · Visit our Help Center". Can't even see the name of the group. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:08, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

I could make a screenshot and send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. --JPF (talk) 15:54, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Should I or not? I want to have the photo "safe", before the origin is not available anymore. --JPF (talk) 14:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

A screenshot is technically "editable", and I would reject that in the same way that forwarded e-mails are not allowed. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

So, what do you want? You can become member of the FB group to get access. --JPF (talk) 20:40, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

You are really thinking, I would edit a screenshot after all other photos of Mr Cruz has passed permission check? --JPF (talk) 20:41, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

i can confirm what JPF writes. i became member of the FB group Zona Spesial Ekonomia Sosial no Merkadu- Oe-Cusse and have access to the foto in question, author "Regio Da Cruz Salu". i am no OTRS volunteer, is my confirmation enough? if a OTRS volunteer wants to get access, use the group link, press join, and jpf can grant access, as he did for me. --ThurnerRupert (talk) 20:33, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Now that the group has been identified, could an OTRS volunteer please request access to it and check the authorship of the image on Facebook (reportedly "Regio Da Cruz Salu", which is the same as in the file description here)? If that matches the permission for File:Leuchtturm von Oecusse.jpg, could you please mark it as reviewed? —LX (talk, contribs) 05:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

It would help if I knew Esperanto.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:01, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Template:Ping:eff G. its not esperanto but tetum :) just request it and put a comment in english that you are otrs, jpf can grant you access. he is normally here in the morning. --ThurnerRupert (talk) 20:20, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

@ThurnerRupert and J. Patrick Fischer: I did that.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:44, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

I just checked the group. I can not see any access request. You got an email, @Jeff G.: . --JPF (talk) 05:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@LX:  Done. @J. Patrick Fischer: Thank you for adding me. Please add direct links to the sources on the other file description pages.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

I understand, that this request concerns images, that have been uploaded to facebook. To my knowledge Facebook uses in its TOS a CLA that does not allow republication of facebook content under a free licence. Would that not mean, that files that have been verified as facebook content by OTRS, must be deleted as COPYVIO? Am I missing something here? --C.Suthorn (talk) 06:48, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

The image was offered directly by the creator to me. FB does not have the right to restrict further use of it. The creator can decide. --JPF (talk) 07:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@C.Suthorn: These files are multilicensed using Facebook's CLA and {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Multilicensing is permitted here as long as one of the licenses is free enough for us.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 07:02, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Thanks everyone who helped out! —LX (talk, contribs) 11:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

2007040710013293

Can somebody pelase check out ticket:2007040710013293 and see if it is a legit ticket, since it has been added in plaintext by Céréales Killer in 2007 on the followig files:

• File:CL01.jpg
• File:CL02.jpg
• File:CL03.jpg
• File:CL04.jpg
• File:CL05.jpg
• File:CL06.jpg
• File:CL07.jpg
• File:CL08.jpg
• File:CL09.jpg
• File:Cl01.jpg
• File:Lelouchfr.jpg
• File:Un homme et une femme — Trintignant et Aimée.jpg
• File:Cl02bis.jpg
• File:Arielle Dombasle Lelouchbis crop.jpg

I'm currently at work, and don't want to open OTRS. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 09:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

• @Josve05a: it's a real ticket but it appears to contain no actual license. It's a shame, because it could probably have been fixed at the time. Storkk (talk) 09:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
  • @Storkk: Would you agree that it would be appropriate to tag these with the appropriate "OTRS recieved (but insufficient)" tag? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
    • @Josve05a: Not sure there's much point, given the ticket is 11 years old... but it might be worth a shot if a francophone user wants to reply to that ancient ticket, and see if the film studio wants to specify a free license. Storkk (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

  @Josve05a and Storkk: Apparently sending the email failed:

          A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
          recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed <omissis>

But original copyright holder said "libre de droit", which is equivalent to our "public domain". --Ruthven (msg) 07:17, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven, Josve05a, and Storkk: So can we restore the images, considering the "Public Domain" in the email? Ciell (talk) 09:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ciell: Ok for me. Maybe you can change the license to something like {{PD-author |author= www.lesfilms13.fr}} (or something similar). --Ruthven (msg) 08:58, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

I'm not sure, there's a discussion on OTRS about the ticket, I'm not confident to restore the images. There's no response from the old mailadres that forwarded the previous emails about the public domain statement. They discuss your translation. Ciell (talk) 18:15, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ciell: I've seen it, thanks. Then I agree with you, better be cautious if we do not all agree on the permission. Cheers, Ruthven (msg) 11:43, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 16:26, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

OTRS permission before upload? How would this work?

Hi

I know that there is a significant delay in OTRS permissions being granted and that this is causing issues with images being deleted. Is there a way that an outside organisation who was not overly familiar with Wikimedia could:

1. Apply for OTRS permission for a batch of images on an external website before uploading them? How would this work? What should they say? What should they add to their uploads to make it work once they have the permission?
2. Apply for OTRS permission for a batch of images which aren't online before they are uploaded to Commons? How would this work?

I'm currently working on documentation on uploads and would really like to offer simple and easy to follow step by step advice that makes it easier for them to share images with Wikimedia and makes OTRS volunteers' jobs as easy as possible. I'm also very happy to work on documentation on OTRS pages to include this information.

Thanks very much

John Cummings (talk) 20:30, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi John Cummings , if the images have not been previously published (either online or offline), they do not need to go through OTRS procedure. The copyright holder can simply upload them to Wikimedia Commons and release all the associated rights when uploading.

But if the images have been published somewhere else, they still can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and if the uploader tags them with {{subst:OP}}, they will not be deleted before an OTRS agent handles the ticket. So there is no need to send a permission statement before uploading the images to Commons. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi @4nn1l2: , thanks very much for your reply, this has not been my experience, images get deleted despite having an OTRS pending template. Could you tell me if there is a way of getting the OTRS permission before uploading the content? Thanks John Cummings (talk) 10:24, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

@John Cummings: No, that is not possible, as far as I know. If I were to handle such tickets, my very first response would be "what image on Commons are you talking about".

But let me say again that {{subst:OP}} works! Please take a look at Category:OTRS pending. There are images uploaded on 4 April 2018 and not deleted yet. There are 140 (133 + 7) days between 4 April and today. 133 is our current backlog which is updated regularly at Commons:OTRS/backlog, and 7 is {{Npd}}'s respite. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:20, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

@4nn1l2: , thanks for clarifying, in the OTRS release generator it gives two options:

1. Files already uploaded to Wikimedia Commons

2. Attach the file to the email

How do it work when people attach the file to the email? Does the OTRS person just provide a template with the OTRS number which is added to the files when the are uploaded?

John Cummings (talk) 14:17, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

@John Cummings: Typically, when they attach the file, they don't provide enough information to fill out {{Information}} properly, so we have to ask for that information. Once we have the information (which sometimes happens in the initial message), we can upload for them (including {{PermissionOTRS}}) or encourage them to upload for themselves. If they upload, we then apply {{PermissionOTRS}}.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:45, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

One follow up question, if the organisation sent an email to OTRS saying 'everything a specific user uploads from our collection is us uploading it' is that possible? Would you then give an OTRS number which they would add to every upload? John Cummings (talk) 14:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

@John Cummings: Yes, that is possible, in which case we make a template for them (including {{PermissionOTRS}}), and they can then use that template on every applicable upload.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:49, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: thanks very much, do you know of an example of where this has been done (so I can understand what the template is and where it should be used in the upload wizard process. John Cummings (talk) 14:55, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

@John Cummings: There are multiple examples in my page creations in Template space, including {{Long Island Museum}}.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:51, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:55, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Ticket:2018101610003076

Can anyone check ticket for File:Branko Trajkov Trak.jpg, File:Zabranjeno pusenje-1.jpg, File:Zabranjeno pusenje-2.jpg, File:SejoSexon.jpg, File:Lana Skrgatic.jpg, File:Robert Boldizar.jpg, File:Toni Lovic.jpg and File:Dejan Oreskovic Klo.jpg and add appropriate template, because this user already had several copyvios. --Smooth O (talk) 10:51, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

@Smooth O: I have approved the ticket and added a template to those files.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:46, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Amulette Vietnam XVIII 1ar (14275014536).jpg

I just got a notification 🔔 that File:Amulette Vietnam XVIII 1ar (14275014536).jpg received an OTRS ticket, however this file was imported from Flickr (then a Verizon property) by me and as one can see in the item description this file is already accurately licensed. As I don't want it to be suddenly deleted after 35 (thirty-five) days or for the ticket to be denied and then deleted, can anyone verify that this edit (Mobile 📱) is accurate? And if the permission comes from Jean-Michel Moullec? --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 8:53 AM you wrote an email message entitled "Japanese and Korean amulets" which used https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amulette_Vietnam_XVIII_1ar_(14275014536).jpg as an example. That message was reproduced verbatim in Ticket:2018062010007572. Krdbot tagged the file description page by mistake. I corrected that mistake. Sorry for the inconvenience.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Alright, thank you very much for clearing that up. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:56, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

:This section was archived on a request by: Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

File:MartinDavis2011 MFO16684.jpg

The licensing of the MFO copy should be re-evaluated. I would like to add the OTRS-confirmed tag with the ticket, but I would receive the warning banner before saving/publishing an edit. George Ho (talk) 23:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Same can be said for File:MartinDavis1976 MFO5003.jpg, File:MartinDavis2001 MFO14505.jpg, and File:MartinDavis2006 MFO10639.jpg. George Ho (talk) 23:05, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

@George Ho: I corrected the license tag for the mentioned files. Please fix them yourself like this one if there are any other mistakes. You can ignore the message by the system. However, please give a link to this edit of mine in your edit summaries. All Images from the Oberwolfach Photo Collection which are marked "Copyright: George M. Bergman, Berkeley" have been released under {{GFDL}}, according to Ticket:2008042410024381. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Could someone please close Ticket#2018110310002536?

I opened "ticket:2018110310002536" by sending .zip files to the OTRS team but then I realised that that is not how the OTRS works as I received those files from Scott Semans but he should send it himself, I will ask him again to send the right files to the OTRS team. I simply forgot that I have no way of proving that I received those files from him unless he sends it. (I'm facepalming) Excuse me for this stupid mistake. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Also most of those files were already on the website so I didn't even need an OTRS ticket for them. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:56, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

 Done Ciell (talk) 16:43, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 16:44, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Validity of OTRS tickets

Apparently an OTRS ticket can be valid and non-valid at the same time. Do admins decide if an OTRS ticket is not valid? Or do I just misunderstand the validity of an OTRS ticket? Vysotsky (talk) 19:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

This issue has already been raised at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Haldjad ooperist Midsummernights Dream Madis Nurms.jpg. Let's keep the discussion at one place. Thank you 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

I didn't know that. Thank you! Vysotsky (talk) 20:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:52, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Charlotte Auerbach and Vote 100 ribbons images

Hi, I've been discussing some recently deleted images with Jcb regarding OTRS permissions for an image of Charlotte Auerbach released by the University of Edinburgh's Centre for Research Collections and multiple images related to Vote 100 from the City of Edinburgh Council Museums and Galleries. The discussion is here. The Charlotte Auerbach image was deleted from Commons as no permission had been received within 30 days but the release was sent on 7 May 2018 and is in the OTRS queue to be processed. Nico Tyack, Collections Officer at City of Edinburgh Council Museums and Galleries has resent permission for the deleted Vote 100 images yesterday. So would it be possible for someone to take a look at these deletions and see if they can be restored? @Mike Peel: is this something you could take a look at? Want to make sure this all goes through okay as we are using the Vote 100 images as part of a showcase Histropedia timeline on one of the giant smart tables at the entrance to the University Collections. Any assistance would be gratefully received, Stinglehammer (talk) 13:05, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Ticket has been handled and the permission is unfortunately invalid. Jcb (talk) 14:27, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

I replied on Ticket:2018050710007885 and Ticket:2018082210004746.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi both. I can't access either of those links so can't tell what has happened or why the permission is invalid. Plus are we talking about the Charlotte Auerbach image OR the Vote 100 images or both? Can you explain more as to what has happened? Or let me know how one can become an OTRS agent so I can see what's happening for myself as ultimately we would like to see these images released on Commons and a lot more from both University of Edinburgh's Centre for Research Collections and the City of Edinburgh Council's Museum and Galleries. very best, Stinglehammer (talk) 11:29, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

@Stinglehammer: Ticket:2018050710007885 is about the Charlotte Auerbach image (our customer is trying to find the rightful heir of the photographer's copyright) and Ticket:2018082210004746 is about the Vote 100 images (internal discussion is inconclusive). Volunteers for OTRS membership are welcome at m:OTRS/V.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:56, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 13:06, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Template deletion request

Yesterday, I've sent an email about declaration of consent for File:Jeong Yun-seok in October 2018.jpg. Can I delete this template (in the file) now? {{No permission since}} And may I have to replace this template {{OTRS pending}} to this template? {{OTRS received}} Or OTRS volunteers who do it? Please reply and thank you. St3095 Loves MU (talk) 11:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

One more hour left, File:Jeong Yun-seok in October 2018.jpg will be deleted. Please consider Ticket:2018110410000671! Thank you. St3095 Loves MU (talk) 11:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

@St3095 Loves MU: I've added the OTRS received template (it's up to OTRS volunteers to do it). In any case, even if the file was deleted, it could have been restored once the OTRS process finished. --Ruthven (msg) 13:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 13:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Possible deletion

Good day @DarwIN! I'm here again to ask about the possibility of deleting a photo due to lack of owner's authorization. I understood your side and I'm open for that possibility as well as I'll accept whatever the result might happens afterwards. Do you think you'll do that? ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by RenRen070193 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @DarwIn.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:07, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

koreanet Flickr stream and ticket #2014070110000717

Hi. There seems to be some past scattered discussions regarding images from the koreanet Flickr stream and/or tagged with {{Korea.net}}. Many seem to concern images tagged with incompatible licences on Flickr, but I couldn't find a clear answer as to whether we have confirmation that images such as this, which are tagged CC-BY-SA on Flickr but have seemingly conflicting information in the caption ("The photograph may not be manipulated in any way") are indeed okay for Commons. Does the OTRS ticket mention whether the specified Flickr licence indeed overrides the caption text? --Paul_012 (talk) 16:36, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

@Paul 012: All images from that stream are supposed to be CC-BY-SA, captions notwithstanding. If you find conflicting captions, please report them via Flickrmail.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:55, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the reply. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

@Paul 012: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 10:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Paul_012 (talk) 07:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

en:File:Richard_Ellis.jpg and File:Richard Ellis-49 copy.jpg

Hi, I noticed en:File:Richard_Ellis.jpg citing ticket 2016112510013602 and claiming that someone removed this image from Commons after it was uploaded. Can someone please validate that 2016112510013602 applies to en:File:Richard Ellis.jpg and that the license is valid? If the image was uploaded to Commons and previously deleted, can you restore it? --B (talk) 12:35, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

@B: en:File:Richard_Ellis.jpg is not mentioned at all in the valid ticket, but clearly it is it looks similar to a less-cropped version of File:Richard Ellis-49 copy.jpg, which was mentioned by name but not URL. I will leave assessment of potential previous deletion and restoration to those with more bits.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Thanks, but please note that in File:Richard Ellis-49 copy.jpg, he is not showing teeth, while in en:File:Richard Ellis.jpg he is - so it's different pictures. Still, though, the uploader of both images is Rsellis (talk · contribs), so if he has authenticated himself in the OTRS ticket, that should be sufficient for us to accept the second image? --B (talk) 06:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

@B: No. The owner and subject of a photo is not usually the copyright holder, the photographer usually is. We need permission from the photographer of en:File:Richard Ellis.jpg via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 10:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, obviously I understand that, I was just seeking to know if it was something general that we had ("my photos of Richard Ellis") or something specific. --B (talk) 12:31, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 14:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Ticket 2018060610008008

OTRS permission for File:Bruno Motta.jpg (Ticket 2018060610008008) seems to be not from the copyright holder which is the professional photographer Lourenço "Luringa" Fabrino whose art work is not usually freely licensed (the file is sourced from a Flickr stream — other photos obviously taken from the same shooting are propperly attributed to Luringa, one of them is currently part of his own stream). Please check if this is valid. Jotzet (talk) 17:07, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

If it's a work for hire, the copyright belongs to the client, and not to the photographer. --Ruthven (msg) 14:52, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 14:52, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Black Ruby Poster.jpg

Hello, how are you? The owner of the image sent the Declaration to OTRS a few hours after I posted the poster. Will you restore it? Image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Black_Ruby_Poster.jpg Emailed Thursday, Oct 25, 2018. Ticket ticket: 2018102510007662 Thanks!.-- Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 06:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi! This is not a very straight forward permission and needs extra attention. The wait for a response at the moment is 162 days, please be patient. Ciell (talk) 12:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello, can you please clarify why "this is not a very straight forward permission"? I am not in a hurry, however I wanted to point out in July I did the same procedure and finished in a few days. Based on that experience I thought it was much simpler. Sincerely-- Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 07:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @Ciell.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:41, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

@Michael.j.schwartz: The e-mailer doesn't mention a source, or how the rights to this movie poster came into her possession. We need more than the information provided in this first mail. Ciell (talk) 16:47, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello Ciell, the poster Black Ruby was created in house by Ave Fenix Pictures Inc. Monica Leon is the owner of Ave Fenix Pictures Inc. Monica Leon emailed Permissions and attached the 'Articles of Incorporation' authenticating her ownership of the studio. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks!.-- Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 05:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello @Ciell: , the owner had sent a new mail with the proofs on the property of the poster, have you received it? ticket: 2018102510007662 Regards.-- Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 00:34, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

I restored the image, permission was complete. Ciell (talk) 15:20, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ciell (talk) 15:20, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!.-- Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 06:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Uploads of User:Kwangmo

With reference to COM:AN#User:Kwangmo, the user regarding uploads a massive amount of files without permission about Category:Firefighting in South Korea. User:Ronhjones stated that the user regarding may think that the old OTRS ticket (Ticket:2015063010008898) may still appliciable to those files. Can any OTRS members who can understand Korean re-open the ticket in order to get possible further permission? Thank you.廣九直通車 (talk) 06:50, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

leKorbo.be

Can someone look at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photos from leKorbo.be Flickr stream? Apparently there's a ticket for it. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:57, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Hey Alexis Jazz! I just had a look and the ticket only covers File:Théâtre_Aegidium_2.jpg. I've added the permission. --AntonierCH ^(d) 20:36, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: AntonierCH ^(d) 11:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

File:David Golub.jpg and File:Lawrence Golub.jpg

These two photographs were uploaded in January 2016 by Plentifully (talk · contribs) with the note: "Golub Capital has given permission to use these images. I will send the permission via email shortly." They are copyrighted Golub Capital/ Jeff Weiner, but before I mark for copyright violation I figured I'd do a good faith effort to check whether permission was ever emailed. I'm not sure if permission for images can be easily checked without a ticket number, but I figured I'd ask. Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

I found nothing relevant. Please tag them with {{Npd}}. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Tagged {{Npd}}. --Animalparty (talk) 22:01, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:49, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

[Ticket#2018041910013661] File:Sketch of Congregation Habonim building improvement.jpg

Hey Dear OTRS team members!

Could you give me an update of the status of ticket
Ticket#2018041910013661?

I've tried to contact the administrator who deleted the file. He said that you should do better on addressing this case.
Please see our conversation here:
[[10]]

we got confirmation from copyright holder Guela Solow.

He sent something of this lines:

We, A R K - give permission to use the work that we own - Sketch of Congregation Habonim building improvement.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sketch_of_Congregation_Habonim_building_improvement.jpg. - under the Creative Commons open license Attribution-Share Alike.

Please let me know if you need anything else to get this file undeleted - thank you very much!

Best regards, Arvids. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.148.144.163 (talk) 22:56, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

We emailed a reply re Ticket:2018041910013661 Thu, 19 Apr 2018 23:37:29 +0000, did you not get it?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 19:41, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Edith Stauber

Ahoi! Mir ist nicht klar, warum die Freigabe der Bilder "Edith Stauber 3 Miniaturen aus dem Leben mit 47 Kopie.jpg" und "Edith Stauber Linz Martinskirche 1.jpg" durch das ORTS-Team (Eintrag durch User Josve05a) nicht erfolgen kann. Es sind eigene Werke von Edith Stauber und diese hat das Freigabeschreiben selbst per Mail an OTRS übermittelt. Bitte um nähere Auskunft, damit ich das ggf. abklären kann - danke! Dromedar61 (talk) 20:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Dromedar61, ich spreche zwar nicht für das OTRS-Team, aber die Bearbeitungswarteschlange (oben auf dieser Seite angezeigt) steht derzeit bei 152 Tagen! Das ist zwar ein Unding; du musst aber bedenken, dass die unzähligen Mails, die bei OTRS eingehen, ausschließlich von Freiwilligen/Ehrenamtlern bearbeitet werden, die einfach zu wenige sind. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Danke Túrelio für die Info. Wenn der Eintrag nur wegen der Warteschlage ist, ist alles ok. Dann verstehe ich nur diesen Satz nicht: "Leider genügten die bisher eingegangen E-Mails noch nicht unseren Anforderungen für eine Freigabe". lg Dromedar61 (talk) 14:42, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Ticket:2018091810001086

File:BIANCHINI EDUARDO serigrafia.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Could this ticket be reviewed by an OTRS volunteer to check what further information about the release can be published on Commons? The drawing detail appears oddly enhanced, presumably through digital manipulation, rather than purely an original scan of a drawing. For the copyright release to be correct the information supplied in the ticket should be more than guesswork of the current possessor of the drawing, in particular the drawing must have been created before 1896 and the artist should be unknown/unknowable through research. Though the subject of the drawing died in 1896, it is possible that this may have been an artist's impression after Bianchini's death, possibly based on portrait photographs, as an etching for later publications.

I have raised the question with @Ruthven: who uploaded this image 12 days after the ticket was received and validated it with an OTRS ticket on-wiki 2 days later. However no further factual information has been added to the image page that would satisfy the normal requirements of visibility per COM:L.

Thanks --Fæ (talk) 17:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

The ticket is not in any permissions queues; it is probably in one of Wikipedia-info queues. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

I can't access it either.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Where is it? May I please have access to it?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Inconsistent licenses, zero information and a ticket that apparently nobody can independently review. Nudge. --Fæ (talk) 01:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

I have just realised that this ticket has been added to 3 uploads.

1. File:Umberto Masotto.jpg {{PD-Italia}}{{PD-1996}}
2. File:BIANCHINI EDUARDO serigrafia.jpg {{PD-1996}}{{PD-ItalyGov}}
3. File:Edoardo Bianchini portrait.jpg {{PD-1923}}

Thanks --Fæ (talk) 05:48, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Image deletion. All images by user Eider Yoldi.

Hello I would like to request the deletion of bunch of images I uploaded myself wrongly. I had no permission from the author to do so. The actual author is http://gema-arrugaeta.net/ profesional photographer and she has demand me to delete them from Wikipedia. The images are not currently used at any article.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gema_Arrugaeta.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/03/Secci%C3%B3n_de_fruter%C3%ADa.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pescader%C3%ADa_en_BM_Supermercados.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bm_Pagola.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mandarinas_Selecta.jpg

Please, let me know the procedure I should follow to achive her request.

Thank you for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eider Yoldi (talk • contribs) 15:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Please file a deletion request for them. You have already nominated one of them for deletion: special:diff/322879458. You can follow the same procedure (select "Nominate for deletion" from the left menu). 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

What gives?

I am at a loss to understand what's going on here now. Please reply there! Thx --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:44, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

@SergeWoodzing: I replied there.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

And? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

@SergeWoodzing: The second ticket is 145 days into the 170 day English language permissions-commons queue, but it may sit at the front for a while waiting for someone who speaks Swedish.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:42, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanx, but Mr Tainton is very fluent in English and I assume he didn't write to them in Swedish. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Yrjö_Vesterinen.jpg

Hi,

I did present the source of the this picture and permissions. Why was it deleted ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakari66 (talk • contribs) 11:02, 28 October 2018‎ (UTC)

• @Sakari66: Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose I oppose restoration of this logo because it appears to be a copyright violation due to it being DW of underlying work over TOO in the source country. Please have the copyright holder of the underlying work send permission via OTRS and carbon copy you on the message.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Undelete request for "Jean-Marc-Germain_business.jpg"

Hello ,

I'd like to inquire about restoring the deleted photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jean-Marc-Germain_business.jpg as the copyright holder sent a permissions email to OTRS last week. Unfortunately, while I was waiting for permissions to be processed an editor deleted the photo. What should be next steps?

Thanks kindly, --Andrewkess (talk) 14:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: OK, will wait another 150 days then... Thanks at least for the quick reply. Andrewkess (talk) 17:09, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

@Andrewkess: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 08:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

File:James Baumgartner.jpeg

The licensing of the image File:James Baumgartner.jpeg was reviewed by one admin and was verified. However, the source says "Copyright: George M. Bergman, Berkeley" instead of "Copyright: MFO". I would like to manually change this to OTRS tag, but I'd rather play safe instead. George Ho (talk) 23:17, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

@George Ho: MFO credits George M. Bergman, Berkeley. Do you have an OTRS ticket? Why do you think you need one?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 23:24, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Photos by Bergman are mostly tagged with OTRS; here's one of them at Category:Pictures from Oberwolfach Photo Collection (Bergman). George Ho (talk) 23:26, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

@George Ho: Ok, I've now read all the tickets at Category:Pictures from Oberwolfach Photo Collection (Bergman). If you uploaded this file (or overwrite it in the future at higher resolution), you could use {{George Bergman permission}}. As it is, I have decided that Ticket:2008042410024381 is most appropriate, and tagged the file accordingly.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 23:52, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Uploads by Leontari1

Hi, regarding images in Category:KUNSTradln in Millstatt & Category:Egon Straszer I would like to know whether the OTRS has received a permission already. The {{OTRS pending}} is in the files since midth of May / June 2018. Pending since 16th of June (10 files), Pending since 25th of May (18 files) best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 02:28, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

@Herzi Pinki: I can find no current tickets that match "Leontari1", "Straszer", or "KUNSTradln". There are two tickets that mention "Leontari1" in permissions-de that were closed in 2016 by @Reinhard Kraasch. Those files that you mentioned tagged 16 June are scheduled to be deleted in about a month; the ones tagged 25 May in about 10 days.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 09:13, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick answer. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:15, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

@Herzi Pinki: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 09:17, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Gina Rinehart 2018.png

This image is a smaller version of one on the Australian Financial Review site, https://www.afr.com/business/gina-rinehart-says-she-pays-more-tax-than-any-other-australian-20181031-h17d56 - now, that site says their image was "contributed", so it doesn't completely rule out that our uploader is actually the copyright owner, but it does make it highly less likely. If it weren't submitted to OPTRS, I'd be nominating it for deletion now. But it is. So, could whoever looks at the OTRS email please make sure they get a good explanation of the reason why the one submitted to us is both a cropped version and a lower resolution than the one sent to the AFR? Thanks. --GRuban (talk) 16:36, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

@GRuban: I could not find an OTRS ticket for this file, and have tagged the image no-permission. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:25, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

 Thank you. --GRuban (talk) 02:43, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Brian Kershisnik.jpg

Hi, after this file was deleted, the original artist got in touch with me and asked how to send in a release. I told them how, giving them the name of the deleted image to use in the release text. Has there been any OTRS activity for this image? Thank you, Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

@Rachel Helps (BYU): No, sorry.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:37, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for checking. I sent the artist another e-mail. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

The artist told me that she sent a release quite a while ago. I've asked her to send the release again. 20:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Zoe told me that she sent the release again. @Jeff G.: , could you check on this request again? Thank you. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:59, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

@Rachel Helps (BYU): Still nothing mentioning "Kershisnik". If there is some other text string I could search for, please let me know (on or off wiki).   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 02:01, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Looks like ticket #2018120310001955? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:56, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

@Rachel Helps (BYU): I can confirm that Ticket:2018120310001955 is now queued.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:55, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: thank you! Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

@Rachel Helps (BYU): You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 07:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

كتاب ألف ليلة وليلة (1955) الجزء الأول

Hello.This is an old book (more than 51 years ago) and I want to upload its pages to Commons.Please create a template (Like these templates) in Arabic and English confirming that the pages of the book are free (And put it in File:كتاب ألف ليلة وليلة (1955) الجزء الأول 2.jpg).Thanks --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

 Done by @Bachounda: .I will upload photos of the pages of the book in next January.Greetings ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:30, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Alan Clark on Channel 4 Opinions 21 February 1993.jpg

I have transferred the above file from en.wiki. On wiki page the OTRS permission ticket was given but it was in incorrect way. Any OTRS volunteer please add OTRS ticket 2011110910014294 to the file using {{PermissionOTRS}}.--√Tæ√ 16:17, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

 Done. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:26, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Image Peter Kraus

Please can anyone check this OTRS? https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2018112510005055

Thx, SchorschG (talk) 09:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

SchorschG: The ticket for File:PeterKraus InésBacher 3161-web.jpeg has not yet been verified and is awaiting a response. Please be patient as there is a long backlog in processing tickets (see note at the top of this page) and this is less then 24 hours old. Ww2censor (talk) 13:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Ticket#2018061410000947 - Noting image permission for Phenomenauts Rebecca Lynn photo

Hello, I had a ticket in the OTRS queue to confirm a photographer's permission for photo licensing. The photographer kindly updated the license for the photo on their Flickr page to release it under CC-BY-SA. I sent an email to OTRS on September 22 to note the updated license and permission. My understanding was that I should wait for the OTRS queue to read through the email and confirm. However, I see the image was recently deleted as it was past a 30 day mark.

Should I do anything now to ask about this ticket, or request OTRS confirmation of the license? Is it better for you if I simply re-upload the image, now that it is licensed under CC-BY-SA? Originally I made a copy of the image, and edited it to remove sensitive personal information, so I had sent the email to OTRS to keep it somewhat private.

Thanks, let me know what you feel is best. --Culix (talk) 03:43, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Since the source is now licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0, OTRS isn't required. An admin should just undelete the file and mark it as license reviewed. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

 Done Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you both very much! I hope it is now okay to restore the image to the article. --Culix (talk) 06:00, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Ticket:2018072510007418 - Prince of Persia screen shots

Hi everybody, I would like to know the current status of the permission associated with the above mentioned ticket, which was sent in July this year for 35 files. Two emails sent by Jordan Mechner are still waiting to be validated (25/07/2018 14:49 and 06/08/2018 18:49). Thanks ! --ΛΦΠ (talk) 16:00, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

All permissions tickets are processed by a team of volunteers. The current permissions-commons backlog is 196 days, so it may be another month or so before that ticket is processed. Please be patient as we work to process all tickets in the queue. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @DarwIn.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

@ΛΦΠ: Sorry for the delay on this. Seems to be mostly fine, but there is a small issue with the license, as they were uploaded under CC-BY-SA-4.0, but the license sent is CC-BY-SA-3.0+GFDL (which apparently is not accepted anymore for many files). They just need to answer stating it's OK to remain CC-BY-SA-4.0 as they already are.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 20:42, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

@DarwIn: Thank you very much for your explanations and your answer by email. I'll do my best to have an answer from the copryright holder to solve the issue. --ΛΦΠ (talk) 19:57, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

@ΛΦΠ: They should not be deleted, in any case. If any of them gets deleted in the meantime please tell me. Darwin ^Ahoy! 20:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

@DarwIn: Jordan has just answered that the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license suits him, I let you check his email --ΛΦΠ (talk) 21:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Amazing collection! Category:Prince of Persia Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:20, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikimedia Wishlist proposal for OTRS - comments requested

Every year the Wikimedia Foundation hosts a wishlist survey. Anyone can wish for a technical tool, and the Wikimedia Foundation staff build out the top 10 requests. See the program at

• Community Wishlist Survey 2019

The submission period ends tomorrow, Sunday 11 November. There is discussion and voting period after this.

I made a request this year for "Easy talk page posts by email", a form which OTRS agents could send back to people who write in. Anyone who completes the form gets the text of their email posted to a Wikipedia talk page. The target audience are people who are making edit requests to Wikipedia articles by OTRS.

The request is at

• Easy talk page posts by email

I would appreciate any comments from OTRS agents on this. Feel free to post criticism or any thoughts.

I posted this to try to identify ways to get more value out of the OTRS system while also reducing the labor investment by OTRS agents. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:40, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Bencemac (talk) 20:40, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

File:DanMunteanu21b.jpg

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DanMunteanu21b.jpg

Please need status update on this file. Email to the OTRS was sent months ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kunalvm (talk • contribs) 22:10, 18 December 2018‎ (UTC)

• @Kunalvm: Signing your posts on talk pages is required by Commons:Signatures policy. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 09:41, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Ticket:2018081510003439 from 15 August is 128 days old. Please be patient for another 72 days or so.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 09:41, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

@Kunalvm: In progress. Bencemac (talk) 19:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

@Kunalvm:  Done, please categorise correctly File:DanMunteanu21.jpg. Bencemac (talk) 18:11, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Bencemac (talk) 18:11, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

ticket:2017120310003964 for File:Famille du Puy-Montbrun.pdf : Fake and fraud

Hi,

File:Famille du Puy-Montbrun.pdf is a copyright violations :literary work protected : published in 2009

The author of the Fake permission ticket #2017120310003964 is not the copyright holder : Mr Patrice du Puy de Clinchamps , and Patrice du Puy Publisher.

Thank you to check this fraud. --Monteli (talk) 23:30, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

 Comment Ticket is in French. Ping Zetud who added the ticket Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:36, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

@Monteli: Hi. Who are you suggesting is the author/copyright holder of this file? --Ruthven (msg) 21:45, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: Hi, The author/copyright holer of this files (book Dictionnaire et Armorial de la noblesse) is Mr Patrice Dupuy and Editions Patrice Dupuy 28, rue Geoffroy-Saint-Hilaire 75005 Paris France and not Mr Patrice du Puy-Montbrun who is a namesake without any connection and without any rights. --Monteli (talk) 04:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Confirmation asked to the customer. Let's wait for a (verifiable) answer. --Ruthven (msg) 20:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 20:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Explicit phone number on picture

I find it a bit weird that File:James Fraser Mustard.jpg displays explicitly the phone number and email address of the person who released that portrait to the public domain, from the very first version it seems. Shouldn't this be hidden somehow? Laddo (talk) 16:39, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

 Done Removed. Yann (talk) 17:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Bencemac (talk) 13:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

File:EPUS 5.jpg

File transferred from Medija centar. Please add PermissionOTRS with tag 2012011710005331. --Aleksamil (talk) 14:13, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Pinging the owner @dungodung, because the ticket is in permission-sr. Bencemac (talk) 18:38, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes, we did get a blanket permission from them back in 2012 for all content from the website, but that was back in the day when we had laxer approach to giving permissions. I wouldn't accept permissions like that anymore. --Filip (§) 21:44, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

@Aleksamil: Please ask permission for the file. Bencemac (talk) 08:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Bencemac (talk) 15:42, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Creating license

Hello all, my mother does not have a WP account but wants me to upload and share images that she takes in her travels; see ticket:2018062810005247 for more. I would love to have a license created and have asked a few times in random places, Jcb advised me to post here. Help please! This would allow me to share more of her photos and remove the risk of them being deleted in the future, without the giant hassle of going through the OTRS process for every single one. Thanks thanks, mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 21:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

 Comment - the ticket is fine - anybody here who is able to create a nice custom template for Mr.choppers? Jcb (talk) 21:39, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

@Mr.choppers: How does she want to be attributed here?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 22:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: - simply IW will do. Thanks a lot! mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 22:33, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

@Mr.choppers: Ok, you may use {{IW}} instead of {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Please beware the capitalization.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 00:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Bencemac (talk) 17:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Re: Ticket 2018122610004632

• Re: ticket:2018122610004632. Krdbot has tagged some but not all of User:Pedro Meier's uploads as OTRS received. If the ticket covers all of the user's uploads, could someone tag the rest? I'd gladly do it myself, but my OTRS privileges lapsed some time ago. --Rrburke (talk) 15:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

@Rrburke: It is certainly within the realm of possibility that the mass of text in that German language ticket contains the names of all of User:Pedro Meier's uploads. However, they are not full filenames with "File:", they are not URLs, and they are not clickable, so it would be tough for me to tell, sorry. I'm not sure how Krdbot managed to tag any of them.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, @Jeff G.: Evidently there is second ticket, ticket:2018122610003768. Is this one any less of a wall of text? I will try emailing the user, but I'm afraid I may not get too far as I don't speak German. --Rrburke (talk) 19:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

@Rrburke: The second one has slightly better syntax and only four names ending in ".jpg". Pedro has not professed to know English. I know a tiny bit of German as transformed via Yiddish and as lampooned on Hogan's Heroes, certainly not enough to attempt to handle either ticket. However, per COM:ABL we have about 17 native German speaking Admins who are also OTRS members and could help, dare I ping them?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 02:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Thanks for your help; that would be ideal. --Rrburke (talk) 13:59, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

@Rrburke: Let's start by Pinging @AFBorchert, Aka, DaB., DerHexer, Didym.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 19:19, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

That’s a huge number of images – I’m working on it. --DaB. (talk) 21:27, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

@Rrburke, Jeff G.: I have handled the tickets now. AFAIS both tickets are about the same pictures, so I merged them. For some images we need further informations, I mailed the sender about that. --DaB. (talk) 22:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

@DaB.: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

@DaB.: & @Jeff G.: Thanks very much! —Rrburke (talk) 16:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

@Rrburke: You're welcome!   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

No problem :-) --DaB. (talk) 18:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Concerning article: Elisa Maria Boglino

Dear Commons. I am writing you, as I hope this will make it more easy to find out about , this article and all the deletet files, and not to stress you. We are three heirs, two grandaughters in DK, and her son in Rome.Through different males, in october and november I have tried to prove this.The first ticketnumber I got was [Ticket#2018092910005927] ,so when you reach this number please look foreward in the mails , to know what to do. There is one important mail 2018-10-24 Subject: Picture License Elisa Maria Boglino, , one older one from 2018-10-10 Subjekt: Picture license Elisa Maria Boglino,, and then the last one from 2018-11-10 subject: ticketsnumbers . The last one contains,all information, signed papers, that we want to do this article, that we want to use the 4.0 license, in the paper of my uncle in bottom of the page, there are some conditions , that we want if possible. We are all registred as heirs,in the danish organisation Visda.dk. We want to use the sign © Elisa Maria Boglino / visda.dk for the copyrigt. The last picture I have uploadet shows this sign, with an active link.You can contact them for further inf. if you need on: smi@visda.dk All pictures were taken by ourselves, directly from the artworks ( ecxept one or two taken from the net). We dont want coordinates from GPS on the filepages, I have tried to remove them. if there are two photos of the same painting, please use the newest ones. other tiketnumbers during the period from late sept until now are Ticket:2018093010003202, Ticket:2018093010003275, Ticket:2018093010003471, Ticket:2018093010003301, Ticket:2018100110007242, Ticket:2018100210007268, Ticket:2018100210009079, Ticket:2018100510000358, Ticket:2018100510000367, Ticket:2018100210009079, Ticket:2018100210007875, Ticket:2018100510006898, Ticket:2018100510004327, Ticket:2018100510000367, Ticket:2018100510000358, Ticket:2018093010003677, Ticket:2018093010003613, Ticket:2018093010003471, Ticket:2018093010003275, Ticket:2018093010003202, Ticket:2018092910005927, Ticket:2018092910005847, Ticket:2018092910005838, Ticket:2018092910005794. I am sorry to course all this trouble, some of them are doublets, please only undelete the newest versions. I really did not know anything about all this when I started, and only tried to do it right, in different ways. I hope this may be helpfull, for your work. Best wishes.Ciopone. (talk) 18:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

There are actually 23 unanswered tickets and they all appear to be in Danish. Ww2censor (talk) 23:20, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

I changed the title for a short one. At least at Ticket:2018092910005927 the link to the file it's broken. I think the customer it's not copying properly the link. I'm not sure if all these tickets are related to one or several files. Perhaps we could merge them and, if the customer speak more or less english, I can help. Other alternative it's to request help in danish WP. Sometimes works... --Ganímedes (talk) 20:19, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

I've talked to the only agent OTRS and he says he only has got permission to handle info-da. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:53, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

I've moved all tickets. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ganímedes (talk) 11:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

写真使用について

ハンガリーの国境フェンスの写真を日本のドキュメンタリー番組で使用したいです。 世界の国境をテーマにしました番組です。 今回は、クロアチアとセルビアの国境テーマです。 その中で、難民についての話があります。 バルカンルートについてです。 セルビアからハンガリーに入れなくなったので、クロアチアの国境に難民たちが殺到しているという現実を伝えたいです。 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 153.227.0.3 (talk) 03:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

About using photographs I would like to use Hungarian border fence photos on Japanese documentary programs. It is a program on the theme of the world's borders. This time is the border theme of Croatia and Serbia. Among them, there is a story about refugees. It is about Balkan route. Since I can not get into Serbia from Hungary, I would like to convey the reality that refugees are flooding on the Croatian border.
 

translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 23:07, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Commons:ウィキメディア内のコンテンツを外部で再利用するをご覧ください。 Nardog (talk) 15:08, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Bencemac (talk) 16:15, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Multiple permissions via email

Hi,

Some days ago I uploaded a file and sent the permission to OTRS and was accepted. In that email the author was includinmg several pictures that I plan to upload in the next weeks. How can I refer to the original ticket when uploading the file to avoid hassle to teh Wikimedia community resending the same email once and again for the different pictures?

Thanks, Junta (talk) 19:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

@Junta: You could reply to Ticket:2018112210006505 or contact Superzerocool on User talk:Superzerocool.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:29, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

@Junta: Is it resolved? Bencemac (talk) 08:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

I've checked randomly some files and all have the OTRS template, so I think it is... --Ganímedes (talk) 12:28, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Then let's archive. Bencemac (talk) 16:12, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Bencemac (talk) 16:12, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

OTRS ticket 2018111210006079

Hi Krd, there is an OTRS email received for “File:Kalimantan_Selatan_-_Ampar-Ampar_Pisang.wav” and “File:Maluku_-_Waktu_Hujan_Sore-Sore.wav but not processed yet. Ticket:2018111210006079. Is there anything to add besides permission statement? Hillun Vilayl Napis (talk) 05:23, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

@Hillun Vilayl Napis: Other than waiting about 22 days from submission until it reaches the head of the queue, no.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

That ticket was handle by me. I think we can close this section now. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ganímedes (talk) 22:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

ticket:2012013110010674

There is a question concerning this ticket in COM:UDR#File:Roland Tisljár psyhologist from Hungary.jpg. Can somebody with access to this ticket help to resolve this? Ankry (talk) 19:54, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

This ticket is in Hungarian and will need a Hungarian-speaking agent. The permissions agent who handled the ticket no longer has access to OTRS due to inactivity. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Hungarian-speaking agent here. How can I help you? Bencemac (talk) 13:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

@Bencemac: Can you please check the ticket and comment if the UDR above makes any sense? (you can also write a note in the ticket and ping us when done) Thank you! --Ruthven (msg) 08:29, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Done, see COM:UDR. Regards, Bencemac (talk) 08:53, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 19:32, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Ticket:2018120810004891.

Hello! Permission submitted on 8-12-18

Re:

Lauren Mikov to permissions-commons 8 days agoDetails

hereby affirm that I, Lauren Mikov, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ModelCarrieMokadim.jpeg. I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Lauren Mikov ABC Copywriter 2018-12-08

[generated using relgen] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webbotz (talk • contribs) 19:45, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

• @Webbotz: Signing your posts on talk pages is required by Commons:Signatures policy. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 20:06, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 22 days before your email is processed and the file is restored. There has never been a file at that URL, I think you meant File:Model Carrie Mokadim.jpeg. Exact syntax is very important here.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 20:06, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 17:49, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Lothar Wolleh Second Vatican Council Image

Is that image really CC-BY-SA? Did his estate license it that way? He was dead before wiki so it could not have been him. How do I verify the license on that photo? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:19B:800:14C7:81F4:FD48:565E:E5D1 (talk) 11:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

I believe the IP is referring to these files, released by ticket:2014072210008751. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @Sphilbrick.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:45, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

The permission was filed by someone with the same last name, so presumed to be a relative who holds the copyright.--Sphilbrick (talk) 20:14, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Ticket:2018020710009647

I would like to know the current state (result) of the permission, associated w the above mentioned ticket#, which was sent already in February this year for the files File:Männerquartett Eupen 1959.jpg, File:Männerquartett Eupen 1959 (2).jpg, File:Plattenhülle Männerquartett Eupen DNB 30.005.jpg, File:Willy Mommer, jun..jpg, File:Willy Mommer, jun. (2).jpg, which were subject of this archived discussion Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard/archive/2018#Bilder_Mommer and were said to be in discussion on July 1st. Though the permission had been sent far longer ago than the current 200 days-backlog, both the uploader and the picture donor still don't know the result of the discussion/evaluation or what might still be missing for a valid permission. --Túrelio (talk) 13:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

The ticket is in German, so a German-speaking agent will have to speak to the actual content of the ticket. The ticket is currently open and unlocked in permissions-de, which appears to have a slightly longer backlog than permissions-commons. The most recent reply from an OTRS agent was four days ago. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Túrelio: This ticket was last answered mid-December and is quite complex. I have pinged the owner of the ticket to see if he has some time to handle it, otherwise I could take over. As far as I've seen, we received an appropriate permission statement for one file (at least), but it was received only in August, not February (FYI). --AntonierCH ^(d) 19:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Cher @AntonierCH: Grand Merci pour votre intervention dans l’histoire complexe de l’autorisation de publication des photos de la page Willy Mommer. En effet c’est une longue histoire dont je vous épargne les antécédents. Par contre il est assuré que l’acquittement des droits d’auteur de la photo de Willy Mommer de la part du seul héritier du photographe Felix Vanderheyden a été envoyée en bonne et due forme à Permission au début du mois d’août par ce seul héritier Bernard Vanderheyden. 5 mois après toujours pas de réinsertion. Je vous prie donc de bien vouloir faire le nécessaire pour réinsérer cette photo sur la page de Willy Mommer junior. Les autres photos citées par vous seront libérées dès que les recherches concernant les photographes adéquats et/ou leurs ayants-droit seront menées à bien, ce qui nous amène dans les archives d’Arezzo en Toscane et de Rome. En attendant, quelques autres photos relatives aux différentes facettes (pianiste, compositeur, résistant et espion pour les alliés) de la personnalité de Willy Mommer seront insérées par moi. Il s’agit soit de photos ANOnYMES publiées pour la première fois il y a plus de 70 ans soit de photos prises par moi-même du vivant de Willy Momler. Je ne manquerai dès lirs pas d’envoyer l’acquittement des droits d’auteur via le formulaire à Permissions. J’espère qu’ainsi tout sera clair. Merci de votre attention User: Dolores18/Dolores18 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolores18 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Dear AntonierCH

Great thanks for your intervention in the complex story of permission to post photos from the Willy Mommer page. Indeed it is a long story of which I spare you the antecedents. On the other hand, it is assured that the copyright of Willy Mommer's photo from the sole heir of photographer Felix Vanderheyden was sent in due form to Permission at the beginning of August by this alone. heir Bernard Vanderheyden. 5 months after still no reintegration. I would therefore like you to take the necessary steps to reinsert this photo on the page of Willy Mommer Junior. The other photos mentioned by you will be released as soon as the research concerning the suitable photographers and / or their successors is completed, which brings us to the archives of Arezzo in Tuscany and Rome.

In the meantime, some other photos related to the different facets (pianist, composer, resistant and spy for allies) of the personality of Willy Mommer will be inserted by me. These are either ANY pictures published for the first time over 70 years ago or photos taken by myself during the lifetime of Willy Momler. I will not fail to send the copyright clearance via the form to Permissions. I hope that everything will be clear. Thank you for your attention
 

translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Here follows a timeline:

6 February 2018 A bunch of files regarding Willy Mommer including File:Männerquartett Eupen 1959.jpg were uploaded and evidently tagged {{subst:OP}} by ArthurMcGill on behalf of Marie-Claire Mommer.

7 February 2018 Ticket:2018020710009647 was initiated by Marie-Claire Mommer as Dolores18 with an email message that included conflicting license numbers. She later posted a copy of her email message into the first discussion.

Private correspondence ensued.

22 April 2018 the files were deleted by JuTa for "No OTRS permission since 2018-02-06".

5 May 2018 ArthurMcGill started the first discussion Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard/archive/2018#Bilder Mommer about the ticket, basically wanting status. Dolores18 posted a copy of her email message into it.

20 June 2018 the files were restored for analysis by Emha per the ticket, and Marie-Claire Mommer was asked three questions (about authors identification, authors years of death if dead, and authors contact information if alive) to clarify the copyright situation.

25-30 June 2018 Marie-Claire Mommer replied multiple times with much information, once in a new ticket.

1 July 2018 Ruthven closed the first discussion because the ticket had been answered.

20 July 2018 the files were deleted by Jcb for "No OTRS permission for 30 days".

31 July 2018 Marie-Claire Mommer was asked for further clarification, was given instructions for an heir of one of the authors to send permission directly, and replied incompletely.

19 August 2018 Bernard Vanderheyden sent heir permission for one photo by Felix Vanderheyden in a pdf file in new ticket without specifying the filename it applied to.

6 December 2018 Marie-Claire Mommer asked for status.

12 December 2018 We found and incorporated the new tickets, emailed, and got a reply.

16 December 2018 This section ensued.

I have just connected File:Plattenhülle Männerquartett Eupen DNB 30.005.jpg as file c to Felix Vanderheyden and requested undeletion for it at COM:UDR#File:Plattenhülle Männerquartett Eupen DNB 30.005.jpg. I am sorry for my previous delays in not wanting to get involved with a complex ticket in German. We still need permission for the other four files. Pinging @Dolores18, Emha.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Arrrgh, that's the wrong image. Can a combination Admin & OTRS member please help me find the right one? I am looking for an image like the one here (direct link).   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:14, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: THat's what you were looking for? File:Willy Mommer, jun..jpg --Ruthven (msg) 21:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ruthven and Dolores18: Thank you for your patience. I have approved the permission for that file, please verify.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 00:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 07:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Ticket:2018080810007458

I uploaded an image months ago and have sent permission to use it. I received an email asking for additional information which I provided. I have sent two follow up emails which have not been responded to and the file has since been deleted. This is now going on three months and I am hoping someone can review the above ticket # along with all of the emails I have sent and have the picture reinstated. Thank you in advance.--Hillpoli44 (talk) 22:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @Arthur Crbz.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 00:28, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

 Solved --Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Robert Kehlman

Can someone check is ticket:2012122710010947 valid also for File:Robert Kehlmann 20th Century Stained Glass A New Definition.jpg, and add appropriate template. --Smooth O (talk) 08:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

The ticket does not specifically release that image. However, based on the circumstances, I don't think there is significant doubt about the source or copyright status of this file, and can be kept. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

The file is not listed in the ticket, so there is no permission. --Ruthven (msg) 13:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 13:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Update permission of File:Kylie Padilla, Filipino - Australian actress.jpg

Hello! Can I ask you an update of the above-mentioned photo I uploaded? The photo was posted on her Twitter account (@kylienicolep) more than a year ago, and I'm glad that it is so unique that is why I use to use the photos from her personal Twitter account instead from her Facebook and Instagram accounts.

PS: If you have an update regarding that particular photo, feel free to answer to my response. TY. RenRen070193 (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@RenRen070193: The owner and subject of a photo is not usually the copyright holder, the photographer usually is. Please have the photographer send permission via OTRS (with "[Ticket#: 2018072910003049]" in the subject line without quotes) with a copy to you. We have not heard from any of them yet, just you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @DarwIn.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:13, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@RenRen070193: Still waiting for the copyright holder authorization...-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 15:28, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@RenRen070193 and DarwIn: Are there any updates or can we close this request? Ciell (talk) 16:29, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ciell: Hi, authorization from the photographer is still missing, as far as I know.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 16:37, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:06, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Ticket 2009101410050321

Ticket 2009101410050321 seems to be for scanned copies of File:The world starts tonight front newcd.jpg and File:Natural force front.jpg album covers sourced from a record retailer, for which the art work is owned by the record company and not usually freely licensed. Please check if this is valid. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:12, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

@Secondarywaltz: The permission was from Cherry Red Records, which matches the source on those files but doesn't match the record label on the English Wikipedia articles for those albums. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:47, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Exactly! Cherry Red Records does not have the necessary permission for those record covers and the OTRS is invalid. Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:52, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

@Secondarywaltz: FYI, I've started DRs for those two files. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:39, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:06, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Request from "14.10.2018 um 20:42 Uhr" and Ticket#2018071510002076

• ticket:2018071510002076: I have sent additional information on 20th september, and that email was received, but nothing happened since then. It should be easy, as the ticket only references a legal assesment by WMDE. I really hope, that this can now be resolved, so that I can concentrate on the new ticket below.
• Request from yesterday: I have sent the request yesterday (20:42 CET, from c.suthorn address to permissions-de). The mail was sent successfully, but I did not get a reply with a ticket number. The request contains proof a a press accredition to an event, and I do not want to upload files before the ticket has been verified. One of the files shows an author signing her autobiography. The author has articles in various languages on wikipedia, but with newest foto from 2014. The book has an article in the english wikipedia, but with a fair-use picture only. Other language versions may soon have articles, as the book has been translated and may soon become a bestseller.

--C.Suthorn (talk) 05:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@C.Suthorn: An Deine verwendete E-Mail-Adresse kann leider nicht geantwortet werden, da ist etwas kaputt. Bitte melde Dich mal von einer funktionierenden Adresse aus. --Krd 09:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@Krd: Das wundert mich, gestern habe ich noch Mail unter der Adresse erhalten Ich habe jetzt eine Testmail an mich gesendet, um ggf. eine Fehlermeldung angezeigt zu bekommen. Im Moment kannst Du aber die Mail-Adresse verwenden, die ich fuer Wikimail verwende, und die Du ja auch hast. --C.Suthorn (talk) 09:33, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Habe Dir nochmal geantwortet. --Krd 10:31, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@Krd: Meine Testmail ist mit 6 Stunden Verzoegerung angekommen, ich habe deswegen bei WMDE nachgefragt. Über die Ticketnummer weiß ich immer noch nicht Bescheid. --C.Suthorn (talk) 17:34, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@Krd: Schaust Du bitte auf File:Stormy Daniels Signiert In Aller Offenheit.webm, Kategorien und Lizenz-Template? Die Mail aus OTRS ist endlich angekommen, jetzt ist nur noch das ältere Ticket offen. --C.Suthorn (talk) 20:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Ich werde nicht auf Zuruf alle möglichen Tickets an der Warteschlange vorbeiziehen und dafür andere Leute länger warten lassen. Das Ticket wird bearbeitet werden, wenn es dran ist.

Wenn es Probleme mit einem bereits bearbeiteten Ticket gibt, die sich nicht per E-Mail-Rückfrage klären lassen, gib mir bitte nochmal Bescheid. --Krd 05:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

OTRS ist schlicht ein chinesisches Zimmer. Dass es zu wenig OTRS-Mitarbeiter gibt, um die Tickets zeitnah abzuarbeiten, ist mir klar. Wie OTRS funktioniert, nicht. Werden die Tickets chronologisch abgearbeitet oder nicht, bleibt ein Ticket beim immer gleichen Bearbeiter, wie laesst sich erkennen, ob ein Ticket haengt, oder einfach nur auf Bearbeitung wartet. Die einzige von aussen zugaengliche info ist eine Tageszaahl, die sich auf die englische Bearbeitungsschlange bezieht. Dann gibt es noch auf einem Server bunte Grafiken, die ich nicht interpretieren kann, und die Kategorie OTRS pending, der taeglich eine Tageskategorie hinzugefuegt wird, bei der aber solange ich darauf schaue keine alten Tageskategorien verschwinden, oder die Anzahl der Eintraege geringer wuerde. Was darin steht (in Bearbeitung befindliche Eintraege, noch nicht angesehene, solche die haengen, oder aufgegeben wurden) ist nicht ersichtlich. Es waere einfach durch ein DB-Tool statistische Inforamtionen und den Status von einzelnen Tickets anzuzeigen, das wuerde auch die OTRS-Mitgleider entlasten, da dann eine Reihe Fragen auf dieser Seite entfallen wuerden. Bedenklich ist die lange Bearbeitungszeit, wenn eine Person, die selber nicht an Wikipedia mitarbeitet eine Frigabe erteilt und dann erst nach ueber hundert Tagen Rueckfragen erhaelt und dann ggf nicht mehr erreichbar ist oder sich mit einer erteilten Freigabe nicht weiter arbeitsmaessig belasten moechte. Zu meinem Ticket: Ich hatte dich so verstanden, dass Du es wohl zumachen willst (oder als gegenstandslos ansiehst). Dem hatte ich widersprochen, aber auch darumgebeten die OTRS-angefordert Bausteine aus den Artikeln zu entfernen (durch Dich oder ein anderes OTRS-Mitglied, aber nciht durch mich, da die Entfernung dieser Bausteine durch ein nicht-OTRS-Mitglied Fragen aufwirft und wiederum Mehrarbeit statt Entlsstung bedeutet. Das wuerde auch die Laenge des Backlogsverkuerzen und die Kategorie OTRS pending entlasten, da es immerhin um 69 Dateien geht, die dort alle aufgefuehrt sind. --C.Suthorn (talk) 06:16, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Bilder Category:Firma Strassburger Filter Westhofen

@Jcb: Ich möchte dich bitten die beiden Bilder, Frau Schnitzler inmitten einer Wirtschaftsdelegation mit Bundespräsident Gauck in Asien.jpg und Frau Schnitzeler zwischen Merkel und Wen Jiabao.jpg (Ticket#2018051410006167) wieder herzustellen. --Nixnubix (talk) 08:50, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Both files are not mentioned in that ticket. Jcb (talk) 11:43, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Vielleicht schaust du mal unter Category:Firma Strassburger Filter Westhofen. Ich habe diese Bilder unter diesem Link hochgeladen und die permission als Sammelgenehmigung gestellt. --Nixnubix (talk) 13:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

These two images were uploaded today by Nixnubix who also added the OTRS ticket number which does not verify permission for these two images. He is not an OTRS agent. We require a new OTRS verification ticket. Ww2censor (talk) 15:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 16:07, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Fré Cohen.jpg

Does the writer of her biography really have the rights to this photo? Or did he just happen to supply the picture from his collection? Tekstman (talk) 20:32, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @Adrignola.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 07:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Tekstman: He just happen to supply the picture from his collection stating it was "copyright free". The permission is weak (forwarded, "for the use of Wikipedia", etc.) and would probably not pass today, but rule sin 2011 were probably less strict. --AntonierCH ^(d) 19:25, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 23:54, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Ticket:2014013010006801

Hallo! Ich würde gerne erfahren, ob dieses Ticket nur für dieses eine Bild (File:Franziska Teuscher Gemeinderaetin.jpg) gilt oder generell für alle künftigen Bilder von gleicher Stelle. Ich frage, weil User:Flurya auch noch zwei weitere Fotos zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt hochgeladen hat, aber ohne OTRS: File:Franziska Teuscher (2017).jpg, File:Alec von Graffenried (2017).jpg. Dank und Gruss --KurtR (talk) 20:53, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Indeed. Otherwise both images have to be deleted, as the source-site expressedly forbids commercial use. --Túrelio (talk) 21:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Im Ticket wird nur eine Datei erwähnt. Die Wahrscheinlichkeit, auf Nachfrage auch eine Freigabe für die restlichen Bilder zu bekommen, halte ich allerdings für recht hoch. --Didym (talk) 21:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

@KurtR: , könntest du dich erbarmen und hier Kontakt aufnehmen für die 2 Fotos? --Túrelio (talk) 21:38, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Danke für eure Antworten. @Túrelio: Ich würde es gerne tun, nur habe ich noch nie so eine Freigabe eingeholt und kenn mich nicht so sehr aus. Was genau muss ich dort sagen, was ist zu tun? Danke. --KurtR (talk) 23:56, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Du brauchst nur an die auf der oben verlinkten Website angegebene Emailadresse eine Mail (deutschsprachig, da ja Bern/CH) schicken, in der du dich ganz normal als Wikipedia/Commons-Volunteer/Ehrenamtler vorstellst und dann den "Fall" schilderst: d.h., jemand hat vor ca. 1 Jahr die 2 genannten Fotos von der Berner Website hochgeladen, dabei aber nicht beachtet, dass deren kommerzielle Nutzung verboten ist, auf Wikipedia/Commons aber nur Bilder hochgeladen werden dürfen (COM:L), die grundsätzlich auch zur kommerziellen Nutzung freigegeben sind. Im konkreten Fall der beiden Portraits ist deren strikt kommerzielle Nutzung allerdings sowieso aufgrund der bestehenden Persönlichkeitsrechte der Abgebildeten eingeschränkt. D.h., selbst wenn die unter einer CC-BY-Lizenz stehen sollten, dürften sie nicht z.B. für werbliche Poster/Anzeigen o.ä. verwendet werden, weil dafür die ausdrückliche Zustimmung der Abgebildeten erforderlich ist. Das solltest du durchaus erwähnen (dient der Beruhigung und stimmt auch). Es sollte aber klar werden, dass die zu erteilende Genehmigung nicht "nur für Wikipedia" gelten darf. Deshalb sicherheitshalber in deiner Mail noch diese Genehmigungs-Vorlage einkopieren, in die du vorher die Datennamen der beiden Bilder einkopierst und den Lizenzgeber bittest, es an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org zurückzumailen (mit CC an dich). --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Danke für die Erklärung. Der genaue Vorgang ist mir zu komplex und mein Verständnis zu klein, ich muss leider verzichten. Sorry. Gruss KurtR (talk) 02:07, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 18:19, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Field in Piazza Santa Croce.

Hi, i have found on your page about Calcico Storico a photo with the name "Field in Piazza Santa Croce". It is writen that the photo: Permission details This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. If you wish to use this content, you do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page. Wikimedia has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by an OTRS member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2006042110010172.

If you have questions about the archived correspondence, please use the OTRS noticeboard.

I need this photo for my documentary about Calcico Storico and I am not 100% sure can I use it or no? I have read the license agreement but I didn't get it.

Please, can you be more specific?

Tnx!

Vedrana — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.164.204.216 (talk) 08:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Honestly, even knowing that in 2006 the OTRS system had different criteria than now, I have difficulties in accepting this as a valid permission. I do some investigation before coming back to you. --Ruthven (msg) 20:34, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

All works published on the Website of Comune di Firenze (so, also these files) are released with CC BY 3.0 IT license. Cheers --Ruthven (msg) 16:10, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 18:17, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Danmunteanu3.jpg

Please kindly check why this file was deleted even when one of the moderators verified the copyright release at: http://www.danmunteanu.com/ccsharealike.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kunalvm (talk • contribs) 09:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

• Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 10:00, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

@Kunalvm: http://www.danmunteanu.com/ccsharealike.html is not mentioned at http://www.danmunteanu.com/fotosynovedades/Fotos%204.html or http://www.danmunteanu.com/index.htm or Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kunalvm or even User talk:Kunalvm#Deleted content - how is one supposed to find it? Do you have evidence that "one of the moderators verified the copyright release"?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 10:00, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.:

Jeff, the copyright is clearly granted. Just tell me where do you want the mention to http://www.danmunteanu.com/ccsharealike.html and it will be done ASAP. I can put it where ever you tell me. Please kindly stop blocking our requests. If you have the option of looking at the file history you will see the copyright was already validated by some other user. Obviously now that it's deleted, I can proof nothing Kunalvm (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

@Kunalvm: http://www.danmunteanu.com/fotosynovedades/Fotos%204.html and http://www.danmunteanu.com/index.htm (or in the footer for all) would be ideal with a pointer to it at User talk:Kunalvm#Deleted content. Is it fair to assume you would like all your files which were deleted to be restored?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Jeff, we have added a link to the cc sharealike disclaimer at the footer of http://www.danmunteanu.com/index.htm Please, kindly restore all the affected files. We've also commented this in User talk:Kunalvm#Deleted content Thanks for your help. Kunalvm (talk) 13:55, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

@Kunalvm: Thank you. Please see COM:UDR#All deleted uploads of Kunalvm.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

@Kunalvm: We have been waiting for your email response to Ticket:2018040810002317 since 8 April 2018.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 07:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:54, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

fotografii Pani Wandy Traczyk - Stawskiej

Dzień Dobry,

piszę w imieniu Agencji Make zajmującej się realizacją i obsługą plebiscytu "Warszawianka Stulecia" organizowanego przez m. st. Warszawa w celu uczczenia setnej rocznicy uzyskania przez kobiety pełnych praw wyborczych w Polsce. Tytuł ten otrzymuje kobieta - mieszkanka Warszawy - za swoją pracę zawodową, społeczną lub inne działania, które w szczególny sposób przyczyniają się do rozwoju stolicy. www.um.warszawa.pl/warszawiankaroku/

Chciałabym zwrócić się z uprzejmą prośbą o niekomercyjne udostępnienie fotografii Pani Wandy Traczyk - Stawskiej. Zdjęcie będzie wykorzystane w celu realizacji animacji o każdej z nominowanych Pań, która będzie pokazywana na Gali Warszawianki 2018 oraz będzie streamingowana. Będę bardzo wczięczna za możliwie szybką odpowiedź. pozdrawiam, Katarzyna Łukasiewicz — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.76.43.80 (talk) 14:45, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Good morning,

I am writing on behalf of the Make Agency dealing with the implementation and service of the "Warszawianka Stulecia" plebiscite organized by the Capital City of Warsaw in order to celebrate the 100th anniversary of obtaining full electoral rights in Poland by women. This title is given to a woman - a resident of Warsaw - for her professional and social work or other activities, which in a special way contribute to the development of the capital. www.um.warszawa.pl/warszawiankaroku/

I would like to ask you with a polite request for non-commercial access to the photographs of Mrs. Wanda Traczyk-Stawska. The picture will be used for the animation of each of the nominated Ladies, which will be shown at the Gala Warszawianka 2018 and will be streamed. I will be very grateful for the quickest possible response. greetings,

Katarzyna Łukasiewicz

translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:55, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Proszę określić, które fotografie, nie widzę żadnych.

Please be specific about which photographs, I do not see any.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:01, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 09:53, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Question about Crownest Highway shields

Hello,

I was looking at the files for the Crowsnest Highway (Alberta: en:File:Alberta Highway 3 (Crowsnest).svg; British Columbia: en:File:British Columbia Highway 3.svg) and they're currently listed as non-free. In reviewing the online sign catalogues from both Alberta (p 5) and British Columbia (p 5), I can't really find anything indicating they're copyrighted. Is it possible to upload the images to Wikimedia Commons? Cheers! -- MuzikMachine (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

@MuzikMachine: Files are always copyrighted at creation-time. They enter into the public domain 70 years after the death pf the author, generally, unless specified differently. However, in this case, a lot of signs seem to be too simple to be protected (all the ones without a drawing); but we need some advice from users that deal with this stuff often. Try bringing this question to the Village pump. --Ruthven (msg) 18:19, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ruthven (msg) 22:37, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

ticket:2018062010007572 (Bob Reis from Anything Anywhere)

Bob Reis from the website Anything Anywhere has sent an e-mail to the Wikimedia OTRS team giving permission for a few very specific pages on his website, due to the nature of his website (being a commercial business) I had made a deal with him that I would ask permission per page (or pages) and that he would evaluate permission to be released under free licenses based on several circumstances, usually if I would also use some of his images in a Wikipedia article and kept him up to date on it, the licenses however are free for re-use but as I would ask him separately per a number of pages I prefer that if an OTRS template for uploading his images would be created that it would be something alongside Template:Anything Anywhere1 so it could leave room for a future Template:Anything Anywhere2. I know that the backlog is 99 (ninety-nine) days so I have no hurry with this ticket being processed (also I am working on several huge projects on Wikipedia and have to import images from earlier tickets anyhow), however when it is processed could the agent who processed the ticket leave a message on my talk page with the template I should use for every upload? --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:06, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Oh yeah, these separate templates for separate permissions should probably all organise into the same maintenance category (Category:Media contributed by Bob Reis (Anything Anywhere)) if possible so they can be grouped together, but as the permission will essentially be either per page or per group of pages each ticket should have its own template. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: Please advise if this issue is still unresolved. --Krd 06:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

200 days backlog

Today the OTRS reached 200 days backlog. And when I look to his history its growing in average of 2 days every 2 days. I dont know how many very old tickets are in the queue, but it might be an idea if one or several agents could search for them and work on these (hopefully only a few) tickets to reduce the number of days strongly. Just an idea. regards. --JuTa 08:26, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Meanwhile several editors are on deletion binges, posting notices to hundreds of images that they will be deleted in 7 days unless they get processed for OTRS! Is everyone aware of what's going on with that? How many images we're losing that should have been given a little more time to for things to be fixed? Is it a problem? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:14, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

You would not believe how many permissions emails don’t get sent until the image is deleted and somebody notices that it’s not there anymore. —AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

That's true. But you would also not believe how many users get frustrated because of this process. They upload an image, request permission from the copyright holder, send an OTRS request, get an answer ("message received, please wait till we've looked at your request"), see their image deleted and removed from the Wiki article, complain, get a fresh answer ("OTRS has a backlog, so that it may take some time. As soon as an OTRS agent handles a valid permission, they will take care of undeletion") and look around in utter disbelief. Why can't we sync these processes? The least we could do is to stop deleting images for which an OTRS request has been received. Or am I missing a point? Vysotsky (talk) 20:20, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

THANK YOU!!! (Please forgive my screaming so ungodlily loud, but I couldn't stop myself when seeing someone finally agree.) The project is sorely amiss with this, urgently in big trouble, and a solution is urgently needed to the overly drastic deletion frenzy. If someone figured out how to effectively sabotage Commons, what's going on right now would be optimal. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:30, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

I'll note that images tagged with {{OTRS received|reason=processing}} are not deleted after 7 days, but 30 instead. The issue is that going through and tagging images with this would double the work we have to do to process the queue. TheDragonFire (talk) 01:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Krdbot does add OTRS recieved if it can find the ticket, but that doesn't happen in every case. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:59, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

I was going to start working on some tickets, although I realized that I can't view the images that were deleted (which is basically all of the ones in the backlog), and thus cannot verify the permission. Is there any remedy to this? Vermont (talk) 00:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Well, those images shouöd normaly not get deleted. They got hold for as minimum of Commons:OTRS/backlog + 7 days. Currently the oldest pending category is from 28. May which is 207 days ago. Maybe the {{OTRS pending}} was missing on the decription pages. Vermont, if you name them, I can (temporariry) restore those files. --JuTa 02:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

I added ", and then tag the subject file(s) with {{subst:OP}}" to Template:Email templates/Consent/en the previous day, so the situation for non-Admins should start getting better. It's down to 199 days 4 hours now.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 07:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Another problem I've noticed, that increases the unaddressed numbers, though not often the oldest tickets, is that several permission emails are duplicates for the same image/s sent without using the receipt ticket number, so they generate a new ticket unconnected to the original request ticket. It may not be noticed or starts the whole process over with another agent, and despite requests to only use one ticket number, they don't, and there is little we can do about it. Ww2censor (talk) 10:43, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ww2censor: We can review all the tickets sent by a particular customer when viewing a ticket by clicking "People" and then "Customer", and then merge as appropriate.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 10:59, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I know that and sometimes use it. It's still a problem we have to deal with. Ww2censor (talk) 11:06, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

• An easier solution would be recruiting more members, I wanted to suggest to the Wikimedia Foundation to set up a stand for OTRS recruitment at the last Wikimania but I have no idea how to contact them, also adding it to a newsletter every 3 (three) months could help, when this year started the backlog was less than a month, so it's better to have too much (trusted) members than too little, also one could try to contact former members if they're willing to help again. ----Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:24, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
• It would be also be helpful if there was a public page that has a table with three columns for ticket number, last date of action, and status (open, pending, waiting for user mail, waiting for action by otrs member, closed, rejected, granted). In the case of my ticket [Ticket#2018071510002076], I gave additional requested information on 20th september and I have no idea, if I need to do anything more, because I am sure I gave all the needed information. --C.Suthorn (talk) 13:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pinging @Krd, owner of Ticket:2018071510002076.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:43, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
• I think we must remove the "30 days" from Template:OTRS received. I have seen some files deleted at 30 days. Also although the backlog is 199 days - that's for the English queue, some of the other language queues have even bigger backlogs. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • I concur. At :en, we do the greater of 30 days or backlog + 7 days and en:user:B-bot tags them accordingly. Deleting things when there is a 6-month backlog just leads to hurt feelings. --B (talk) 15:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
    • @Ronhjones: @B: Are you aware that files with {OTRS received} are being deleted 30 days after our first response, not 30 days after being tagged? For the past several years I have been the one who usually handles this process. I always open the ticket. If it is still unanswerred, I reset the timer. example. If there was a response but not yet 30 days ago, I reset the timer to the date of first response. I don't think that anything should be changed here. Jcb (talk) 21:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
      • @Jcb: , a problem with that is that sometimes a copyright holder sends in a new email creating a new ticket. Or the agent who was handling it gets busy and doesn't handle the response, putting it back out into the backlog. Ideally, anything that has been in the {{OTRS received}} state less time than the backlog shouldn't be deleted unless either someone has reviewed it and is certain that we're not going to get an acceptable statement of permission, or unless someone has searched and made sure that no follow-up has been received. --B (talk) 21:28, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
        • Such a change would paralyse the process completely, leaving a lot of copyright violations online in an attempt to save a relatively small number of files that may be undeleted anyway as soon as the new ticket has been handled. Jcb (talk) 21:36, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
          • Maybe there is a way to separate out the "really reviewed" from the not really reviewed images. If Krdbot tags an image as {{OTRS received}} but no human has ever even looked at it, deleting it after 30 days doesn't seem to be helpful. But if a reply has been sent and we never hear back, then that's different. --B (talk) 00:28, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
            • Yes, that is the current situation. If a file has been tagged by Krdbot but there was no human response to the ticket by an OTRS agent, I reset the timer of the tag instead of deleting the file. Jcb (talk) 22:29, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

The current progress of undeletion is not user-friendly; creating new requests one by one (and checking that the user is an OTRS-agent or not) cots a lot of time. Why do not we make the undeletion tool smarter? Here is what I think: there would be a button for OTRS-agents (the tool or an AbuseFilter would check that the user is an agent or not). The tool would ask the name of the file and the ticket number, than it would create the request with a “verify me” link (ping Jeff G., who is using similar format). It would cost just few clicks and less than a minute, but it would make our work much-much easier. What do you think? Bencemac (talk) 20:50, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

@Bencemac: We already have the generic {{UO}}. Before that was developed, I developed my own UDR gen URL, which uses my mostly filled out User:Jeff G./NewUDR preload. You are welcome to make DWs.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:39, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

I was invited here. IMO the OTRS/Wiki image release system is just not up to the job. Women in Red publishes 100 of articles about women without photos. Why? These people are alive and only too pleased to send us a picture and we are 99.9% certain that we are talking to the right person and the picture is either a selfie (or very similar). There are notable/busy people. We can just about convince them that their twitter image is copyright.... but we tell them that they are going to have to send emails to prove who they are who they say they are and then they lose interest.... and I must admit I do too. We have keen editors who are trying to add pictures which everyone knows are OK, but they are accused and hounded as if they have some hidden reason for wanting to help our project. (Not only that our gatekeepers seem to take pride in deleting donated content because it MIGHT (in some strange unreasonable parallel universe) "breaks the rules"). I don't use OTRS and I cannot recommend it even to people who think they may be able to use it (no one has that much patience). It doesnt need fixing it needs rethinking and reinventing. Sadly I don't think that commons will the heir apparent to PD archiving. I am optimistic that another group will fork our content and create a better resource with a rethought way of adding new pictures, films, sounds and 3D scans. I do hope so. This job is worth doing. Commons is a great resource and was a great idea. Victuallers (talk) 11:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Is it an unimaginable thought that we stop deleting any and all images which admins judge that they look like they will pass OTRS requirements, until time catches up and makes the whole process work again, giving uploaders a fair chance to conform? This (unless I'm mistaken, as I often am) is a good example of an image that someone claims is his, of himself, now deleted only because of the backlog. And this talk page, where a person with a limited enough command of English that it's hard to communicate with h at all, while that person is causing the deletion of a huge amount of images in 7 days after h/s tags them, to me is very scary. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

@SergeWoodzing: No, this is a good example of the process working just fine. We responded to the ticket 25 November, but we never heared back from the client, so that the file has been deleted 26 December. Jcb (talk) 22:35, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Each year around chistmas WMF asks for donations and a large part of these donations is used for campaigns to attract new authors, espacially women. As Victuallers pointed out above the otrs backlog scares away this possible authors. Wouldn't it therefore not be a good idea, if WMF used part of this money to employ paid otrs members (and if it only was for half a year to get rid of the backlog) - this might do more for a wider authors base than any women in red edit-a-thon. I also like to come back to my idea of a status/statistics page: Even so the "owner" of my unanswered ticket has been pinged, I am still ignorant about what might be wrong with the ticket (happy new year, btw). --C.Suthorn (talk) 21:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

No, a backlog is not a problem at all. "Please patiently wait until an OTRS agent handles the ticket. If an OTRS agent handles a valid permission, they will take care of undeletion." And then wonder why people think Commons doesn't make sense. Vysotsky (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

("The process is working just fine") - When you say "fine" then that means that we missed the chance of sharing a picture with our 1bn users because we pissed off the person who was trying to help us. We wasted everyone's time, But we broke no rules so "The process is working just fine". *What* It needs rethinking. Imagine. I have a procedure agreed by WMF lawyers as imperfect but OK, an email and pic from the donator, a Wikipedian editor in good standing who 99% believes that its all OK and is willing to add it to commons with their reputation on the line if the abuse the process. We can load it, now, today, immediately! The process would work because we take down mistakes (like every other site) and we have a $1m dollar fund to pay out the $2.63 that is owed by the occasional person who can prove that they are the sole heir of a photographer who died 68 years ago and demands that we pay damages. If a site used this process then would you be convinced that the image was PD, I would.... and if I was a judge then I would say that this process was reasonable and law abiding. Victuallers (talk) 11:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Commons isn't "like every other site" - every other site on the planet cares only whether or not they are going to get sued for using the image. We actually only WANT things that are public domain or published under a "free" license. --B (talk) 13:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

 Info Permission-commons is under 1400 open tickets, which is minus ~100 tickets in the past days. Of course, some other queues have huge backlogs as well. Bencemac (talk) 15:48, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Many of the older tickets has been waiting for a replied of the customer over 6 months. See as example: Ticket:2018062510009472, Ticket:2018062710005043, Ticket:2018070110004644... Don't you think is it time to quick close those tickets? I don't think they're going to answer and, if they do, perhaps they do or did in another ticket. Others are waiting the response of an agent, such as Ticket:2018061510001801, Ticket:2018062610000139, Ticket:2018062510009276... --Ganímedes (talk) 22:20, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

PD: Regarding one of the oldest tickets, please see: [11]. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Unless I'm missing it at m:OTRS/Personnel, Jayantanth (talk · contribs) is the only OTRS user who speaks ml? If this ticket is in ml, maybe contact him directly? --B (talk) 22:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

@B: , I am not native speaker of ML, if you anything shown about India related subject, you can forward me. Jayantanth (talk) 04:38, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Good idea, yes. However, this is just one of the problems: many lenguages we don't have or have few agents actives, lots of spam generating new open tickets by minutes than we cannot erase or close (even the authomatic response system confuses and replies them, as such Ticket:2018091910005599, Ticket:2018100810003046, Ticket:2018102310009441, Ticket:2018110710005697, Ticket:2018120310001286, Ticket:2018120310007968, Ticket:2018121810001991), Ticket:2019010110000871, Ticket:2018102310009441, Ticket:2018120310001286... ), an inefficient system that make hard to see messages, follow messages, find something... As someone says, it's a 10 yr old sofwate and needs lots of patchs. It would be nice if someone request a new software in the next Whishes of the community campaing. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Besides, many of the new ticket are attendant immediately, but the oldest stay there. I think our delay is not so if we take this in consideration. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ganímedes: If it's obvious spam, I don't think that someone speaking that language is really necessary to close it. If it's not spam, and nobody who speaks the language is available, what if we just process it using Google translate? If it is the simplest case where they are pasting the CONSENT form (and we can see it is the consent form using Google translate) and their claim of copyright seems reasonable (someone from the company that likely owns the copyright, etc), why not just process it? Heck, even if it's not the simple case, we could reply in English with a "Google translate" translation. Google translate is good enough these days that, while it may miss the nuances of local idioms or humor, if you use straight forward sentences you're going to get your message across. --B (talk) 12:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Perhaps I'm not been clear. Yes, I know this is spam. Question is: why we get over 4.000 spam tickets open? Why cannot close them as such? Why we even received this? My hotmail or gmail account is able to filter all this, or even avoid them. Instead, we're swimming in tons of spam, forever open, and sometimes (often, I must say) our system answer it. Everybody think this is normal? The system is old and inefficient. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:09, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

I don't know if there is a spam filter at all? If there is, it needs to be a very, very, very, very permissive filter because if someone sends a DMCA takedown notice (which might have a bunch of URLs in it and look spammy), there can't be any chance of the spam filter picking it up. It would be nice if we could blacklist email addresses - there are some newsletters that come in from the same email address every time and if we could simply blacklist them, we could cut down on it a lot. --B (talk) 13:16, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

The system should automatically delete all tikcets in Junk queue after X time (one day, perhaps?). And of course, stop answer them. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

"The process is working just fine." Well, it isn't. This user (Sarduzo) went to a German Forum on Commons to ask about the procedure (on 12 November), uploaded an image and sent an OTRS request on 14 November (precisely as advised), to see his photo deleted on 15 December by User:Jcb. When he complained, he got the encouraging answer: "As soon as an OTRS agent handles it and the permission turns out to be valid, they will restore the file". Though I can't take a look at the photograph nor at his request, and thus can't judge the validity of the decision, I do have a judgement about the procedure. If we want to chase away good faith users, we need to continue this way: deleting photographs while the OTRS ticket hasn't been handled yet. Vysotsky (talk) 13:14, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Have you considered volunteering to help with the backlog? --B (talk) 13:19, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

I've been thinking about that too. Since we've got over 100 tickets waiting more than 180 days, delete the files with an OTRS pending is extra unnecesary work. To access validity it's request a restoration, so another request in Noticeboard, wait for an admin... The deletion after 1 moth in this conditions is far unrealistic. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

(A couple CoE later) Yes, I'm doing exactly so: I've attendant over 75 old tickets this week. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, I wish we would wait until $BACKLOG days have passed to delete them because it blocks non-admins from being able to process tickets. At :en, I have a bot that automatically tags things that have been {{OTRS pending}} for longer than $BACKLOG days with {{subst:npd}}. I wish we would just do that here - so that humans don't have to make a decision about how long to wait before deleting things. --B (talk)

Totally agree. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Thats allready included in the {{OTRS pending}} template. It marks anything "older" than Backlog+7 days with npd. But the value of backlog is just that huge. --JuTa 17:48, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Update: backlog is now 162 days and there are less than 1 000 tickets in queue permissions-commons. The number of tickets is decreasing. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes, but I don't think is enough. Over 65 months waiting for an aswer, when many (if no most) times permission is wrong or uncomplete it's too long wait, IMHO. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:47, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ganímedes: That is 5 months 7 days, please check your math.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:52, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, finger mistake . Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

We're doing a good job! Increasing the activity in the last month is bringing its fruits, and it's more pleasant to deal with the tickets when the queue is shorter (or lowers quicker). Do not forget to ask to Commons admins to undelete the files that have an OTRS email, in order to check the author and the metadata, if you don't have the rights. Lets carry on! --Ruthven (msg) 17:48, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ganímedes: It takes time to answer all these emails and to reduce the backlog. Just wantes to mention that it's positive to see the backlog reducing. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:05, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Just for your interest: We are back at 200 days backlock - see Commons:OTRS/backlog. --JuTa 07:28, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Very sad. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Problem don't change: we're alway the few 5-6 same agents answering everything. Prior to be unactive, the backlog was around 150 days and 800+ tickets to solved. After some months of inactivity of my side, backlog is again in 200 and 1300+ tickets. If the system don't change, it's to me impossible to see how we're going to avoid this. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Progress, finally

Now I can say we're under 300 tickets total. Unfortunatelly, we still have many tickets up to 150 days, but It's a progress. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:54, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:31, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Mugshot Sofie van den enk.png, ticket ticket:2011112010040412

Permission is highly doubtful. It is a scan, not a photo, it has a very low resolution, and the uploader has a history of trying to submit pictures of the subject with no regards for copyright. Tekstman (talk) 08:16, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

@Tekstman: my money is on "screenshot from analog television". - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 10:03, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

@Tekstman: There is no license version number in that ticket.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:37, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

@Tekstman: The email explains it is a picture of a picture he took himself. @Jeff G.: Is that a problem, no license version? It is our standard Dutch template. Ciell (talk) 19:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ciell and Drdreetje: That could be a problem if it was challenged in court.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:40, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

I checked all our licence pages, but we do state a version number everywhere, though I might not know of another page. @Drdreetje: Can you recall what page you referred the copyright holder to? Just so I can update the text. Ciell (talk) 22:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ciell: "a picture of a picture he took himself" does this mean "a picture he took himself of another picture that he didn't take himself", "a picture that was taken of a picture he took himself" or "a picture he took himself of a picture he took himself"? Is there an uncropped version? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:52, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

The last one, "a picture he took himself of a picture he took himself", sorry to be unclear. There's no original file in this 7 year old email conversation, so I'm not sure if there's any sense in a follow-up. Ciell (talk) 23:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ciell: sorry to go on about it, but is that your interpretation or is that literally what the ticket says? It wouldn't be the first time someone claims "I TOOK THIS PICTURE!!!" because they, in fact, took a picture.. of someone elses picture. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 00:08, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

The OTRS agent asked about the poor quality, to which the author replies: "Het is een uitsnede van een foto die ik zelf heb gemaakt." You could interpreted that both ways, now I think of it: "It is a crop of a picture I made/took myself." Ciell (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ciell: exactly, that's what I mean.. They may have meant "I created this crop, so the copyright is mine, right?" It happens. I can't say if that's the case here, but it happens. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 00:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: "That could be a problem if it was challenged in court."

Actually, it wouldn't be. A judge would be much more likely to interpret the lack of a version as "the re-user can pick any version they like" rather than "the author can go extort the re-users for violating their copyright". (this is part of Dutch law: if something is not clearly specified in a contract, it will be interpreted the way that is most beneficial for the signee) - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 00:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Wait, that picture can be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drdreetje (talk • contribs) 13:37, 5 February 2019‎ (UTC)

• @Drdreetje: Signing your posts on talk pages is required by Commons:Signatures policy. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:46, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Files deleted, uploader blocked. --Krd 04:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Voltmetro

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?wpSearchUser=Voltmetro&wpSearchPeriodStart=&wpSearchPeriodEnd=&wpSearchTitle=&wpSearchImpact=0&wpSearchAction=any&wpSearchActionTaken=&wpSearchFilter=69

Please review this and replace permission if the ticket is correct. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 13:25, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: I'm not over the moon about this one. The OTRS agent told the e-mailer to add the Permission ticket. The agent appears not to be an agent any more. The whole ticket is based on a copy and paste e-mail from the copyright holder (not nice...) I think I will e-mail the copyright holder direct to confirm. Oh, what a tangled web we weave... Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 01:00, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz and Ronhjones: I've also spotted it and created {{Davecskatingphoto.com}} for further uploads. I agree that the permission is quite weak... and thank you Ronhjones for following this up with the copyright holder. --AntonierCH ^(d) 19:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

I sent it to 4 e-mail addresses, one bounced (I expected that), no one has replied to date. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz and AntonierCH: Answered on 2019-2-19. There are some files without the permissions template yet? --Ruthven (msg) 22:36, 28 May 2019 (UTC)